R. Alex Raines
First Sergeant
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2015
- Location
- Monte Vista, Colorado
I am ready to observe another.
Was FI ever realistic to expect?Topic suggestions?
Those would be interesting topics, raines. Thanks.Was FI ever realistic to expect?
Grant or Lee?
Sherman or Jackson?
Bragg or JE Johnston?
Problem is, the lawyer on the one side would destroy the layperson on the other side.How about a debate on the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus? Should be easy to find a for and against and should make for a lively and interesting debate.
Problem is, the lawyer on the one side would destroy the layperson on the other side.
Laughing-out-loud.Problem is, the lawyer on the one side would destroy the layperson on the other side.
IMHO I think enough material is available for a lay person to go head to head with a member of the bar. However it is most likely to be two lay persons.
Ned,Whats FI? ( as in "Was FI ever realistic to expect?")
My topic proposal: Battle of Iuka -- US victory or CS victory?
Thing is, you might be able to form a measly battalion of insurance agents in the study of the Civil War Era. Us lawyers could for a division.Laughing-out-loud.
Lord have mercy . . . that's funny !
Agreed.
Plus . . . I'll raise ya' two insurance agents for every one attorney.
Is that your indication you'll take one of the sides?Problem is, the lawyer on the one side would destroy the layperson on the other side.
I think its too broad a topicA) Rosecrans v Grant (Maybe I am being trollish here)
Thats a good one. I'd go for it.B) Did Special Order 191 really matter?
I'm in awe of the collective intelligence of . . . as you say. . . "us lawyers".Thing is, you might be able to form a measly battalion of insurance agents in the study of the Civil War Era. Us lawyers could for a division.
Would depend on how the sides were framed, for one.Is that your indication you'll take one of the sides?
I was done in by auto correct plus some intentional bad grammar.I'm in awe of the collective intelligence of . . . as you say, us lawyers.
You missed out on the recent discussion about Rose's expose?I think its too broad a topic
Thats a good one. I'd go for it.