[quote=hoosier]
20. The information I have says that Henry "Harry" Heth and either John F. Reynolds, John Buford, or Gabriel Paul would fit the question. Armistead, Garnett, and Hancock do not, since they did not meet until July 3. Iverson and Robinson certainly fought each other on July 1, but I don’t have anything that says they served under Johnston in Utah. Ewc, do you have a source that says they did?
George- i used as my source a standard sourcebook- Mark Boatner's
The Civil War Dictionary, published by the Vintage books civil War Library. Here is the intro (pre-war) sections on both generals:
IVERSON, Alfred.
CSA general. 1829-1911. Ga. He left military school to fiht in the Mexican War and then became a lawyer and railroad contractor. Entering the R.A. in 1855, he was a Lt. with the 1st
Cav. and served in garrison and on the frontier, in Indian fighting, in the Kansas border disturbances, and in the Utah Expedition. When Ga seceded....
ROBINSON, John Cleveland. Union general. 1817-97. N.Y. A cadet at West Point (ex-1839), he studied law and then joined the R.A. as 2nd Lt. 5th US
Inf. in 1839. He fought in the Mexican and Seminole wars and served on the frontier and the Utah expedition against the Mormons. Of this last service he wrote that it was a plot to "denude the eastern states of troops, so that 'a dissolution of the Union' might be easier"...
As AS Johnston commanded the Utah Expedition, these officers would have been under his command.
I matched up the individual engagements on Day 1 at Gettysburg using maps and Order of Battle in Sears' and Trudeau's Gettysburg works. I knew of Robinson's statement, it is outspoken and stands out like a sore thumb, so basically I looked at the brigades which engaged him that day and found Iverson. Hope this helps. ed