CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Haversack - Special Features & Discussions > The Mason-Dixon Gazette

The Mason-Dixon Gazette A place where daily news briefs from around the country will be posted. Your comments are welcome and encouraged!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-15-2007, 11:05 AM
johan_steele's Avatar
NCOIC, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South of the North 40
Posts: 4,078
Default Tomb of the Unknowns needs help

The AC had this and I do believe it quite important... if some in Congress are more than willing to spend a million dollars on a Woodstock museum they can bloody well find the money to preserve a TRUE monument to the American Spirit.

http://www.authentic-campaigner.com/...ad.php?t=12882

Help Save the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier at Arlington National Cemetery!

It's hard to believe, but officials at Arlington National Cemetery plan to replace the original Tomb of the Unknown Soldier with a new replica solely because of repairable cosmetic imperfections. This 1932 monument is nationally significant and eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places.

The 48-ton marble block has two nonstructural cracks which pose no threat to visitors or the historic structure. Surprisingly, federal bureaucrats want the replica carved from new stone that experts agree will likely again crack along its grain just as marble does naturally when exposed to the elements. Repair and proper care of the Tomb (re-grouting the cracks and using only gentle cleaning methods instead of high-pressure power-washing) is possible and is the preferred method for fixing the existing cracks, as other marble monuments such as the Lincoln Memorial were repaired.

Once the National Trust learned about this ill-considered plan, we raised the alarm with Members of Congress and tried unsuccessfully to consult with those who administer the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier.

A decision to determine the fate of the Tomb Monument is expected by September 30th. Your help is needed to weigh in with decision-makers to help save the memorial.

Please Contact your Senators and ask them and the Senate Committee on Armed Services to explore alternatives to replacing the memorial; and.

Contact John Metzler, superintendent of Arlington National Cemetery and ask him to repair rather than replace the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier
__________________
Few take the trouble to understand or to view the American scene with perspective. And we Americans love to find ourselves guilty of something. However, it is never I who am guilty, but those other Americans, the past or present government or the other political party. Americans almost never find other countries guilty. It is always ourselves or our fancied influence in other countries. Louis L'amour
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-16-2007, 10:07 AM
larry_cockerham's Avatar
1st Lt. (3500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,980
Default

Bro Steele, your emotions may be overunning practicality on this one. The concept of honoring unknown soldiers is a tradition developed long before 1932. This monument, while serving a very valid purpose, is not particularly 'historic' itself. The cost and practicality of repairs, perhaps destined to deteriorate more rapidly than the original, may well dictate a new symbol is in order?
__________________
Ancestors in US Army: 13th TN Cav; 10th TN Cav; 3rd NC Inf
Ancestors in CSA Army: 48th VA; 63rd VA, 5th NC Cav; 37th NC
Wife and Grandson's CSA: 15th AL, 51st GA, 41st TN; 36th TN; GA Mil 1197 Dist
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-21-2007, 10:48 AM
FSPowers's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 546
Default

If I understand the law correctly, places on the National Register of Historic Places have to be kept in as much as its original condition as possible, that should mean repair, not replace the monument. We have a building in San Antonio (the Smith-Young Tower, now the Tower Life Building) on that list and because of that law, one of the elevators is manually operated.
__________________
F. S. Powers

Union Ancersor: Pvt Arnuah Norton, 60th Ohio. (G-G-G Grandfather) Died at Salisbury NC, November 3, 1864

Confederate Ancestors: Captain Thomas A. Morrow, 29th Texas Cavalry (G-G-G- Uncle) and 2LT George W. Morrow, 31st Texas Cavalry (G-G-G Grandfather). Both survived the war

My blog: http://fspowerscw.blogspot.com

My Book; http://stores.lulu.com/store.php?fAcctID=1900736

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-21-2007, 11:18 AM
larry_cockerham's Avatar
1st Lt. (3500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,980
Default

"places on the historic register"...... Does a monument qualify? I, too, would like to see it repaired. That wasn't my point. If constructed in 1932 more than likely the WPA had some input. That, in itself, should have some historical significance if that was the case. As we get older, history has a way of following us. Sometimes though economics and practicality win out. I agree with both you and Shane that the effort to restore should be maximized. If anyone or any group of folks deserve our nation's thanks; it's the folks commemorated by this monument.
__________________
Ancestors in US Army: 13th TN Cav; 10th TN Cav; 3rd NC Inf
Ancestors in CSA Army: 48th VA; 63rd VA, 5th NC Cav; 37th NC
Wife and Grandson's CSA: 15th AL, 51st GA, 41st TN; 36th TN; GA Mil 1197 Dist
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-21-2007, 11:22 AM
cw1865's Avatar
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Riverdale, NJ (Morris County)
Posts: 1,215
Default The monument

I'm not 'morally opposed' to a new monument, but the one thing that does bother me about it is that new construction seems to be very 'cost functional' , so the desire to create something as 'monumental' might be there, but somehow it just won't be done as well.

You see that transition in NYC clearly, they went from building things like the Empire State Building, Chrysler Building, Grand Central Station (which are solid classics) and began building WTC, Citibank Building, etc. (steel framed glass houses). You may like the glass buildings but their arrival was definitely driven by cost at the expense of detail.

Somehow, someway, the attention to detail just won't be there.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-21-2007, 01:58 PM
larry_cockerham's Avatar
1st Lt. (3500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,980
Default

A point well made. I suspect you are right.
__________________
Ancestors in US Army: 13th TN Cav; 10th TN Cav; 3rd NC Inf
Ancestors in CSA Army: 48th VA; 63rd VA, 5th NC Cav; 37th NC
Wife and Grandson's CSA: 15th AL, 51st GA, 41st TN; 36th TN; GA Mil 1197 Dist
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations