CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Haversack - Special Features & Discussions > The Mason-Dixon Gazette
Register FAQ Members List Chat Calendar Mark Forums Read

The Mason-Dixon Gazette A place where daily news briefs from around the country will be posted. Your comments are welcome and encouraged!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-07-2003, 05:41 PM
scone's Avatar
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mt. Juliet Tennessee
Posts: 2,131
Default

<center>Lincoln statue angers Rebel ancestors
By Rebecca McClay - THE WASHINGTON TIMES</center>


A group of Confederate sympathizers yesterday said it plans to protest the
scheduled placement of an Abraham Lincoln statue in a national park in Richmond.



"We feel that it's an in-your-face type of gesture and it serves no purpose," said Bragdon Bowling, commander of the Virginia Division of the Sons of Confederate Veterans. "They are saying that everyone should be on the same page now, but let them put up a Confederate symbol and see what happens."

The United States Historical Society announced yesterday that a bronze statue of the former president and his youngest child, Tad, will be revealed April 5, at the Civil War Visitor Center.

The day will mark the 138th anniversary of their trip to still-smoldering Richmond soon after Southern forces abandoned the city in flames and days before the Civil War ended in April 1865.

The life-size statue of the 16th president — one of the first such memorials in the South — portrays parental love, not triumphalism, said sculptor David Frech. The outdoor statue will overlook the James River and Richmond skyline.

"Here is a national hero, a small boy and a beautiful city by the James River, all united again," said Robert Kline, chairman of the nonprofit United States Historical Society, which commissioned the statue and works on behalf of museums and other groups on projects of historic and artistic value. "This time, Lincoln's in Richmond for all time."

But Mr. Bowling said the statue would provoke Virginia residents whose ancestors died in battle. He said a statue of a Confederate soldier and a Union soldier shaking hands would encourage more unity.

"I am very disappointed with the National Park Service because in this case they are clearly taking a side," said Mr. Bowling, who will organize efforts to oppose the statue. "There certainly has been nobody clamoring for a Lincoln memorial in Richmond.

"We have plans, but I need to do a little more thinking. This was just sprung on us," he said.

Richmond was abandoned after Union forces led by Gen. Ulysses S. Grant attacked on April 2, 1965. It is now home to towering statues of Confederacy figures including Gen. Robert E. Lee, Andrew "Stonewall" Jackson and J.E.B. Stuart.

The tribute to Lincoln is the culmination of months of effort on the part of Edward C. Smith, director of American studies at the American University and co-director of the Civil War Institute.

Mr. Smith, a black professor who supports Civil War heritage groups, proposed the statue in a June 2, 2001, Washington Times article.

With the exception of a few schools, there are no monuments or memorials to Lincoln in the South. But Lee is memorialized in the District, Mr. Smith wrote.

He wrote that Richmond is an ideal place for the monument because there Lincoln reminded Confederate officials that he meant what he said in his second inaugural address: "Let there be malice toward none and charity for all."

The statue will show Lincoln and his son on a bench against a granite wall. The words "To Bind Up The Nation's Wounds" will be etched into a capstone.

Elaine Mancini, spokeswoman for the historical society, said the cost of the statue has not been determined. The society is raising money by selling miniatures of the statue, she said.


__________________
Steven Noel Cone
Living Historian and Battlefield Preservationest
"Silver Spring Mess" ; "Citizens of the Bonnie Blue" ; "46th Tn Inf. Co. K"
SCV Camp 723 General Robert H. Hatton
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-09-2003, 03:54 AM
unionblue's Avatar
Captain (5000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 5,236
Default

Steve, are you saying you agree with this statement from Mr. Bowling of the SCV? That a statue of Lincoln has NO place in Richmond? That the event it depicts DID NOT happen? That it is not historically correct? That after 140 years after the event, we still can't get past this "us' vs "them" attitude? Should Lee's mansion in Arlington be torn down because he was on the "losing" side? I mean, after all, his place is rather close to Washington and all those Union graves in the cemetery right beside his house after all. Couldn't this be considered a "slap in the face" of all those brave Union men?

OF COURSE NOT! Lee suffered enough when Gen. Meiggs buried those Union dead on his home, forever taking it away from him. But that is in the past and is part of our history, like it or not. Mr. Bowling is, IMO, trying to suppress history, by denying the idea that Lincoln never went to Richmond after it's fall. And the idea that this is somehow a slap in the face, to who? The 21st Century Confederate Reserve Forces lying in wait for "round 2?" I say Mr. Bowling should get over it and let history tell the story.

Just my opinion,
Unionblue
__________________
"The American people and the Government at Washington may refuse to recognize it for a time but the inexorable logic of events will force it upon them in the end; that the war now being waged in this land is a war for and against slavery." Frederick Douglass

"Loyalty to our ancestors does not include loyalty to their mistakes." George Santayana
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-09-2003, 04:13 AM
scone's Avatar
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mt. Juliet Tennessee
Posts: 2,131
Default

Sir,

I just posting some news that I found interesting..

I do agree though that statue of a Confederate soldier and a Union soldier shaking hands would encourage more unity, than one of Lincoln and his son.

__________________
Steven Noel Cone
Living Historian and Battlefield Preservationest
"Silver Spring Mess" ; "Citizens of the Bonnie Blue" ; "46th Tn Inf. Co. K"
SCV Camp 723 General Robert H. Hatton
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-10-2003, 10:51 PM
unionblue's Avatar
Captain (5000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 5,236
Default

Steve, you got a point there.

Unionblue
__________________
"The American people and the Government at Washington may refuse to recognize it for a time but the inexorable logic of events will force it upon them in the end; that the war now being waged in this land is a war for and against slavery." Frederick Douglass

"Loyalty to our ancestors does not include loyalty to their mistakes." George Santayana
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com.
Site Design Version 4.2. - Website powered by Subdreamer CMS
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations