CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Haversack - Special Features & Discussions > The Mason-Dixon Gazette
Register FAQ Members List Chat Calendar Mark Forums Read

The Mason-Dixon Gazette A place where daily news briefs from around the country will be posted. Your comments are welcome and encouraged!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-15-2002, 10:02 AM
ami's Avatar
ami ami is offline
Major General, Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: held against my will, NJ
Posts: 539
Default

<font size="+0">Two States and Their Plates: Virginia, West Virginia, Have Differing Experiences with Sons of Confederate Veteran Car Tags</font>

July 15, 2002--West Virginia, which came into being as a result of the Civil War, is one of a dwindling number of states to refuse to issue "special interest license plates" bearing the logo of the Sons of Confederate Veterans.

Legal action may be forthcoming. There are differing explanations from state officials as to the reason for the refusal, but a group called the Rutherford Institute is not impressed.

The institute's legal coordinator, Ron Rissler, told the Beckley (WV) Register-Herald last week that if it can be proved that the refusal is due to state disapproval of the content of the logo, they may take the Department of Motor Vehicles to court.

"Is it because the plate is offensive or what? I believe that's what they're saying," Rissler noted. "That's not good enough. That's not constitutional."

The nonprofit institute, based in Charlottesville, Va., has won similar battles over the SCV plate in Maryland and Virginia, he pointed out.

"We've got [West Virginia] surrounded," Rissler laughed.

State SCV commander Terry Whittington of Smithers says DMV refused his group a plate on grounds SCV couldn't generate enough sales to justify its issuance - an argument he disputes.

"They told me they'd have to sell at least 100," he said. "That's not a problem. We can show them more than that. We still have approximately 300 members. You have to be a member in order to obtain a plate. You have to be able to prove you're a descendant of a Confederate veteran."

Another dispute is whether specialty tags require a specific act of the legislature to be issued, or if a law signed last year allows civic and educational groups to apply directly to the DMV for a specialty plate without legislative approval.

A bill authorizing an SCV plate was introduced last year by Sen. Bill Wooton, D-Raleigh, but he later withdrew the measure and apologized on the floor to fellow senators. The Senate Judiciary chairman called the measure, which he said he had offered merely as a courtesy to one of his constituents, "a lapse in judgment."

"We'd litigate this thing in a heartbeat, don't get me wrong. If we can determine that the plate is being prohibited, denied, because of its content, because of the flag, we will take the action that we took in Maryland and Virginia," Rissler said.

The proposed plate would feature the Confederate battle flag and three generals, including West Virginia native Stonewall Jackson.

The SCV's Whittington said he feels the state is discriminating against his organization over a misconception is couched in racism. The group sees itself as a historical society dedicated to the memory of its ancestors who fought in Confederate gray in the Civil War and nothing more.

The Rutherford Institute already thwarted an attempt in Maryland to rescind a 2-year-old plate after some lawmakers found it offensive over its inclusion of the Confederate battle flag. In Virginia, the same group successfully fought the state, both at the district level, then at the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

"West Virginia is in the Fourth Circuit," Rissler said. "So they better be careful."

Courtesy of:
Civil War Interactive: The Daily Newspaper of the Civil War
www.civilwarinteractive.com


__________________


Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-17-2002, 09:29 PM
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Dillsburg, PA
Posts: 1,618
Default

The states should never have started allowing those special interest license plates.

One of our Pennsylvania legislators remarked a few years ago that the number of different special interest license plate styles in Pennsylvania alone was getting completely out of hand. He vowed to put an end to it.

The result? His efforts were totally ineffective. New special interest plate designs just continue to proliferate without limit.

In our litigious society, if the government tries to tell anyone that there really isn't any need for a new license plate design, chances are they'll scream "discrimination" and file a lawsuit - and the state really doesn't need the expense and trouble of defending itself against all those lawsuits, so new plate designs just keep coming into reality.

Excuse me now - I have to go submit my design for a special interest license plate to honor Pennsylvania citizens having the same names as British musicians.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com.
Site Design Version 4.2. - Website powered by Subdreamer CMS
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations