CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - "What if..." Discussions

Civil War History - "What if..." Discussions What if they had attacked instead of digging in...? What if he was in charge of the army instead...? Did you ever have a "What if..." question, and you weren't sure where to post it? Here's the place to ask these speculative questions!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-05-2008, 02:35 PM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 27
Default Lee's invasion is successful. What next?

Lee destroys Meade's army at Gettysburg and captures Washington, Baltimore, Harrisburg, and Philidelphia? In spite of Lee's success, Lincoln decides to fight on. What would Lee have done next? Would he have invaded New York or would he have prepared to face Grant and other Union forces coming in from the west? What would Grant have done? Would he have moved his forces to face Lee or would he have tried to end the invasion by moving into Virginia to threaten Richmond and force Lee to come and attack him?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-05-2008, 06:02 PM
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,881
Default Lee's invasion successful, what next?

WOW!!! You dealt Lee a lot of aces. AoP destroyed, Washington D.C., Baltimore, Harrisburg And Philiadelphia captured. If he could do all that I do not see why he couldn't take New York City.
However, you left the Union the last Ace, Lincoln and I would still bet on him to Rally the North to drive out the invading hordes of seditious southern slavers.
Such a disaster would either despond the North or rally a white hot will to drive out the invaders.
So, If, as I conjecture, the invasion sparks general resistence, then Lincoln will have volunteers streaming in, Grant will be hurried North with part of all of his Army, meanwhile Lincoln's Call to Arms to Save the Union from the slavocracy will have loosed the Norths other hand that had been tied behind it's back and an all out war of national liberation would be ignited that would burn all the way to the Gulf.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-05-2008, 06:44 PM
timewalker's Avatar
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Flower Mound, Texas
Posts: 940
Default

Wow, indeed. Definitely alien space bat territory.

I tried to craft a response, but if Lee destroyed the Army of the Potomac and captured each of Washington, Baltimore, Harrisburg and Philadelphia then there is no real response possible. What would be left but to throw in the towel?
__________________
"There must be more historians of the Civil War than there were generals figthing in it... Of the two groups, the historians are the more belligerent." David Donald, Lincoln Reconsidered (1961)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-05-2008, 07:09 PM
Baggage Handler #2's Avatar
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 421
Default

Space bats, c'mon, I think what happens next is that B-17's based out of Cleveland start pounding Richmond.

Say Lee has 40,000 effectives (too high, but let's just say) after Gettysburg. How many does he lose taking Baltimore, Philly, and Washington, maybe 6000 each? That leaves a garrison of 2000 for each of those cities to control a hostile population. With everyone else foraging like there's no tomorrow.

I'm no expert, but the consequences of a victory by Lee at Gettysburg are pretty similar to the consequences of a defeat. Either way he abandons PA absent a chunk of his army. The best he can realistically hope for is to give Virginia a good harvest in 1863.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-05-2008, 07:20 PM
cw1865's Avatar
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Riverdale, NJ (Morris County)
Posts: 1,215
Default Done

Army of the Potomac is not going to get destroyed, but the remnants are still going to stream back to DC.

In my opinion Lee's 'victory' at Gettysburg would result in a political victory.

You just can't do Fredericksburg, Chancellorsville and a negative Gettysburg and expect to continue....
__________________
The United States forever!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-05-2008, 09:39 PM
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,094
Default The AoP took advantage of Confederate Logistic Unpreparedness

There is no next. Lee cannot capture Philadelphia. Lee cannot capture Washington. Lee did not destroy the Army of the Potomac at Gettysburg. Lee was forced to attack defensive positions and used up nearly all his ammunition.

Lee had ammunition for one good battle. And the Army of the Potomac boxed the ANV into a narrow place at Adams County. They grabbed ahold and didn't let loose until Lee started his retreat to Virginia.
Lee did not have enough ammunition to attack either Philadelphia or Washington, when he left Virginia.
In a short time, while in Pennsylvania, Lee lost half his cavalry horses and half his artillery horses.

I'm sure the Northern generals knew the downside of the Army of Northern Virginia. Their spies would have counted supply wagons, for forage and ammunition as the Confederates moved into and though the Chambersburg area.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-06-2008, 12:35 AM
diddyriddick's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC.
Posts: 554
Default

"I'm no expert, but the consequences of a victory by Lee at Gettysburg are pretty similar to the consequences of a defeat."

Political considerations aside, I'm with Handler on this one. Even if Lee wins at Gettysburg, he's not going to destroy the AoP. And his resources are so depleted that he can not possibly prosecute further offensive action.

It may have given some ammo to the Copperheads, though.
__________________
David

"I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person" diddyriddick
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-06-2008, 04:24 PM
cw1865's Avatar
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Riverdale, NJ (Morris County)
Posts: 1,215
Default Union Ordinance

We have to remember that a Confederate victory at Gettysburg would yield Union ordinance.
__________________
The United States forever!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-06-2008, 10:35 PM
diddyriddick's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC.
Posts: 554
Default

I'm not so sure, CW. Guns, perhaps, but Lee had plenty of those. How much ammunition would he have yielded? I am no artillery expert, but it seems to me that the ammo in the caissons and limbers would have been pretty much expended in the type of battle envisioned here.
__________________
David

"I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person" diddyriddick
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-07-2008, 12:49 PM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 27
Default

It was Lee that thought all this was possible. He said after the war that if he could have had Stonewall Jackson at Gettysburg that he would have won a great victory. He said that a victory there would have allowed him to capture Washington, Annapolis, Baltimore, Harrisburg, and Philidelphia, and that would have established the independence of the Confederacy. I'm like the rest of you, I don't really believe he could have done all of that. However, it would be interesting to see what would have happened if he could have accomplished all of that. No matter how much Lee could have done, I don't believe that Lincoln would have ever thrown in the towel.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What if Hood's Tennessee Campaign had been successful? Ter61 Civil War History - "What if..." Discussions 154 02-15-2008 08:05 AM
Jeb Stuart during the invasion Ter61 Civil War History - "What if..." Discussions 21 11-13-2007 01:06 PM
Building a successful blog Daniel Sauerwein Campfire Chat - General Discussions 4 10-21-2007 11:07 AM
Lee's Tarheels gary Book & Movie Review Tent 3 01-27-2006 07:10 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations