Civil War History - "What if..." DiscussionsWhat if they had attacked instead of digging in...? What if he was in charge of the army instead...? Did you ever have a "What if..." question, and you weren't sure where to post it? Here's the place to ask these speculative questions!
What if all the former US Military Officers remained loyal to the Union?
Dear List Members;
I proffer this what if question -- What if former/veteran and active military officers, such as General Lee, General Lee's kinfolk also Generals with last name Lee, Jackson, Armistead, Pickett, Garnett, Longstreet, Johnson, Johnston, Early, JEB Stuart, DH Hill, AP Hill, Beauregard, Bee, etc. -- All from West Point, US Military Academy refused to join the Confederacy?
I shall look forward to your comments!
Respectfully submitted for your consideration,
M. E. Wolf
Quite an understatement! As former military men, Davis and Bragg belong on that list as well as Beauregard. Without these guys there would have been military chaos.
ole
__________________ I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
I proffer this what if question -- What if former/veteran and active military officers, such as General Lee, General Lee's kinfolk also Generals with last name Lee, Jackson, Armistead, Pickett, Garnett, Longstreet, Johnson, Johnston, Early, JEB Stuart, DH Hill, AP Hill, Beauregard, Bee, etc. -- All from West Point, US Military Academy refused to join the Confederacy?
I shall look forward to your comments!
Respectfully submitted for your consideration,
M. E. Wolf
Had that happened, one could only conclude that most of them were less than honorable men, or at the least, weren't paying much attention. All men, if not otherwise coerced, were challenged to take a stand in this war based on their convictions. Men of the southern states, such as Lee, decided home was worth fighting for and one's neighbors worth assisting. Many Union men put their hopes in preserving the Union. Three of my ancestors did so; others followed their hearts. Nathan Bedford Forrest, who Richard mentioned earlier, wanted no part of secession and stated so at the time. He, like many thousands of others, was in a fight he couldn't avoid, so he rode with his neighbors.
__________________ Ancestors in US Army: 13th TN Cav; 10th TN Cav; 3rd NC Inf
Ancestors in CSA Army: 48th VA; 63rd VA, 5th NC Cav; 37th NC
Wife and Grandson's CSA: 15th AL, 51st GA, 41st TN; 36th TN; GA Mil 1197 Dist
Last edited by larry_cockerham; 05-25-2008 at 06:53 PM.
IF these military soldiers had not joined the Confederacy -- there would have been those eager to take their places I would think.
General Gordon jumps out to me--a citizen soldier who learned as he went much like General Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain --There are many 'educated men' to whom took up the cloak of leadership and became Generals--
What of state militias? --
Revolutionary times did not have an organized army/navy/Marine--yet, they created a good army from 'citizen' soldiers.
Just some thoughts,
Respectfully submitted for consideration,
M. E. Wolf
The learning curve of a green army with green officers would have taken much too long. Then you have the local allegiances to the southern men. It is possible that most of what was the ANV would have become the Union Army of Virginia, with Lee and Jackson at it head.
One thing is for sure, the tactics of the souther army would have been much different than those of the north at the start of the war.
__________________ Located near Indianapolis, home of Col. Eli Lilly and the Eli Lilly Civil War Museum
If the Southern States would have still been determined to secede even with the National army standing behind the our Constitution and National government, the only option would have had to been a gorilla style warfare or insurgent warfare against the national army in the south.
Most likely a much longer war and maybe just as bloody..
Mind Freeze!
__________________
"States Rights are about States Wrongs" - Jesse Jackson
In looking at the US Regular Army pre Civil War, the Army wasn't all that big to begin with--thus the need for volunteers in great numbers was called for by President Lincoln.
Perhaps my confidence in the leadership of the militia is a bit more than can be understood however, in any 'emergency' -- the citizens, such in cases of disaster are very cooperative and accepting of leadership if it makes the task a success and efficient.
Guerilla warfare has been a part of American warfare, as the Native American Indians fighting among themselves before the Colonies--established this tactic--due to their numbers and weapons. The Indians gave the Western posts a fit and clobbered the Regular Army many times--even after the Civil War. Guerilla warfare was used by Colonel Marian-Revolutionary War, in the War of 1812, French and Indian War --
I am also looking to those graduates of VMI -- to which is similar to the USMA aka West Point --this was a potential pool.
I am also looking at former soldiers and non-commissioned officers -- at times, in reading the official reports--they had more common sense tactics then 'West Point's drill into the mind out-of-date tactics' in regard to the advent of newer weapons.
Just some thoughts.
Respectfully submitted for consideration,
M. E. Wolf
I'm not seeing a large scale guerilla war as sustainable or possible there/then.
Where both armies suffered, I think, were an absence of qualified company grade officers and NCO's, although the lunacy of elected officers was soon noticed and abandoned.
The generals... It's a mixed bag. I used to subscribe to the popular thought that the southern generals were generally better. I'm much less sure of that. It may have been the command structure or it may have been the leadership - and there is a difference - but I don't get the sense of an overall plan by CS generals, but I do get the sense of a lot of bickering and jealousies (Bragg, Hood, Jackson, etc). Yes, the north had this as well, but mostly these individuals either surpressed their personal ambitions or were shuffled to some backwater post, where their contribution was logistics and planning.
At least that's my take.
After looking this over, it occurs to me that there may be some potential for exploring the relationship between "personal ambition" and a decision to accept or apply for a commission in the CS army. Not all of course, but it would be interesting to explore.
Last edited by Baggage Handler #2; 05-26-2008 at 08:54 PM.