CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - "What if..." Discussions
Register FAQ Members List Chat Calendar Mark Forums Read

Civil War History - "What if..." Discussions What if they had attacked instead of digging in...? What if he was in charge of the army instead...? Did you ever have a "What if..." question, and you weren't sure where to post it? Here's the place to ask these speculative questions!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-16-2008, 09:26 AM
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: central Indiana
Posts: 364
Default Roscrans captures AOT at Tullahoma

If it had not been for the 13 days of heavy rain during the Tullahoma campagin, the possibality existed that Roscrans could have prevented the Army Of Tennessee from crossing the Tennessee River. It is also possible that the AOT would have been nutralized at that point. What effects would that have made in the general picture of the war?
__________________
Located near Indianapolis, home of Col. Eli Lilly and the Eli Lilly Civil War Museum
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-16-2008, 10:19 PM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 106
Default

Interesting.
The real unknowns I think revolve around Grant's rise and the subsequent unlikelihood of Sherman's march.

But... bagging a whole entire army isn't something that actually happens very often... Chickamauga took out about 1/3 of the AOT as it was, and even Hood got away with about half of his army after Nashville, didn't he?

So my guess is that Chickamauga, a legitimate Union defeat, was even more devastating to the AOT - and when combined with Bragg's losses at Missionary Ridge, possibly as serious as your proposal. I'm going to vote a "net zero" with the Grant wild card stated earlier.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-17-2008, 03:42 AM
M E Wolf's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 605
Default

Dear Richard and List Members;

I do find that weather played a very important role in the movement and or lack of it, during the many battles and those times approaching a potential battlefield and or retreat from a battle.

It seems for four years the heavens cried, per se--as often rain caused rivers and streams to flood at the most critical time of military timing.

In regard to your particular case -- William Starke 'Old Rosy' Rosecrans, may have had some closeness as far as being born in Ohio which is not that far from Tennessee and IF, with a strong IF, he had been raised around Ohio and Tennessee rivers, he would know there characteristics, given rain and how they shed into the major river flows, Tennessee River one of the major ones.

That said; my view in the larger frame of things -- it must be mentioned that the entire Union army was not in one spot but, in different theaters. In the case of General Rosecrans, he had his assignment in the Tennessee area and that is where his focus would be and, I do find the 'levels' of forces not so great as other forces, this is why there was often need for cooperations by other 'divisional commanders,' such as the Army of Ohio.

Another glaring factor, as I read these Official Reports of the Rebellion; is that the Union army was able to replenish soldiers. It was much harder to replace Confederate soldiers.

Then both sides had to contend with 'nature' and supplies.

During this focused operation, other operations out West and in the East theater of war; was going on.

The only opportunity to 'bag' an entire Army would be perhaps at the final "Grand Review" where all the Army was in one place; not just one theater but all the armies from West to East, South to North. Even so, there were armies around elsewhere; as they had to tie up the loose ends after surrender and maintain law and order until reorganization of civil and legal authority returned. And, the ratio of soldiers Union 5 to 1 Confederate --so the amount of men captured would mathematiclly spell disaster by loosing the percentage of the total force, rather than look at the numbers alone. The South being light of men and length; were efficient and swift; where the Northern army was lumbering in number and mass--length and width of travel space and time. When the Southern Army began to be dangerously light--which was around the time General John B. Hood took over; he had little to work with, especially with supplies and well nurished men. The percentage is, to my opinion the factor.


Just some thoughts.

Respectfully submitted for consideration,
M. E. Wolf

Last edited by M E Wolf : 05-17-2008 at 03:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-17-2008, 09:31 AM
larry_cockerham's Avatar
1st Lt. (3500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,706
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by M E Wolf View Post
Dear Richard and List Members;

I do find that weather played a very important role in the movement and or lack of it, during the many battles and those times approaching a potential battlefield and or retreat from a battle.

Then both sides had to contend with 'nature' and supplies.

Respectfully submitted for consideration,
M. E. Wolf
Much agreement here. The DIFFERENCE in Union and Confederate was how they contended with nature and supplies. Union logistics and sources were FAR superior to Confederate efforts to resupply troops. After a few such occurrences, Confederate morale, no matter how revered their cause, had to suffer immensely. An army without food isn't strong enough to fire bullets and often have far more serious thoughts in mind. Some went home, others died.
__________________
Ancestors in US Army: 13th TN Cav; 10th TN Cav; 3rd NC Inf
Ancestors in CSA Army: 48th VA; 63rd VA, 5th NC Cav; 37th NC
Wife and Grandson's CSA: 15th AL, 51st GA, 41st TN; 36th TN; GA Mil 1197 Dist
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
29 April, 1862 : Union captures New Orleans william42 Campfire Chat - General Discussions 3 04-29-2007 06:07 PM
Tullahoma Campaign civilwarbuglertn Civil War History - The South & Western Theaters 20 07-02-2006 07:57 AM
Final segment: Shelby Foote captures the war william42 Campfire Chat - General Discussions 0 03-01-2006 01:12 PM
Tullahoma, Tennessee larry_cockerham Civil War History - The South & Western Theaters 6 01-15-2005 09:01 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com.
Site Design Version 4.2. - Website powered by Subdreamer CMS
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations