CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - "What if..." Discussions
Register FAQ Members List Chat Calendar Mark Forums Read

Civil War History - "What if..." Discussions What if they had attacked instead of digging in...? What if he was in charge of the army instead...? Did you ever have a "What if..." question, and you weren't sure where to post it? Here's the place to ask these speculative questions!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-07-2008, 08:03 PM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 106
Default What if Granger goes to Chattanooga ...

...instead of Snodgrass Hill at Chickamauga?

After all, they had no orders.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-07-2008, 08:34 PM
2nd Lt. (2500+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,664
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baggage Handler #2 View Post
...instead of Snodgrass Hill at Chickamauga?

After all, they had no orders.
My guess: Union disaster.

On Thomas left flank, Ganger dropped off troops who ended up fighting against Forrest's cavalry.

On Thomas' right flank, Granger's troops staved off the advance of Longstreet's troops just long enough for Thomas to get other men there and start pulling out of the trap he was in.

If Granger stays where he was or pulls back towards Chattanooga, Longstreet's advance probably breaks over the high ground and into Thomas' rear. Forrest's men might have lapped around the right. None of that could have been good for the Union.

Tim
__________________
"Let us, then, consider all attempts to weaken this Union, by maintaining that each state is separately and individually independent, as a species of political heresy, which can never benefit us, but may bring on us the most serious distresses."
Charles Cotesworth Pinckney of South Carolina, 1740-1824, Revolutionary War soldier, one of the authors of the US Constitution in 1787, speaking at the South Carolina Ratifying Convention in 1788.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-07-2008, 09:24 PM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 106
Default

That's what I'm thinking.
A misplaced or ill-understood word caused the gap that created the mess, a well timed word between Steedman and Granger prevented a much more serious mess.

But absent this, Chattanooga can't be held, can it? Or am I reading too much into it?

(pic: west end of Snodgrass Hill facing roughly west, including markers of the Union reserve corps and cannon denoting Confederate positions)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GRANGER, Gordon Mark Wadsworth Terms beginning with the letter: G 0 02-18-2008 04:50 PM
GRANGER, Robert Seaman USA Mark Wadsworth Terms beginning with the letter: G 0 02-18-2008 04:49 PM
Chattanooga, Ga? richard Campfire Chat - General Discussions 3 02-18-2008 06:49 AM
Chattanooga and Chickamauga mt155 The Civil War Traveler's Companion 11 01-22-2008 04:05 PM
The Boys of Chattanooga Clyde R. Hedges Civil War History - The South & Western Theaters 1 11-02-2006 08:33 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com.
Site Design Version 4.2. - Website powered by Subdreamer CMS
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations