CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - "What if..." Discussions

Civil War History - "What if..." Discussions What if they had attacked instead of digging in...? What if he was in charge of the army instead...? Did you ever have a "What if..." question, and you weren't sure where to post it? Here's the place to ask these speculative questions!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 09-21-2007, 09:17 AM
larry_cockerham's Avatar
1st Lt. (3500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,980
Default

Yes, bit myself in the dna source on that one. Please pardon, as you have many times before.

Is it possible a slave could have been a son of the South or North?

I know some black folks today who love the South, almost like they consider it part of their heritage.
__________________
Ancestors in US Army: 13th TN Cav; 10th TN Cav; 3rd NC Inf
Ancestors in CSA Army: 48th VA; 63rd VA, 5th NC Cav; 37th NC
Wife and Grandson's CSA: 15th AL, 51st GA, 41st TN; 36th TN; GA Mil 1197 Dist
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 09-21-2007, 11:35 AM
Ozark Iron John's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Osage Beach, Missouri
Posts: 451
Default

A CSA insurgency would've had to have been very violent early on to have been successful.

Murdering Lincoln as he passed through Baltimore or as he skulked into Washington in the middle of the night would've been a good start. Brahamin Yankee William Lloyd Garrison would've had to have been gunned down in public. Fugitive slaves like Frederick Douglass and William Wells Brown would've had to have been Lynched! Dozens of women in the American Anti-Slavery Society, women like Maria Weston Chapman, Lydia Maria Child, Abby Kelly, Lucy Stone, Sojourner Truth, Elizabeth Cady Stanton and others could've been silenced by being sent to Australia like that baby killer in Quigley Down Under.

The Liberator newspaper, the African Meeting House and the Charles Street Meeting House in Boston would've had to have been burned to the ground. Perhaps at an appropriate time when they were full of fire breathing liberal abolitionists.

Don't tell me it couldn't have gone that way. We all know it could've very easily.

Last edited by Ozark Iron John; 09-21-2007 at 11:51 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 09-21-2007, 12:10 PM
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,881
Default What If the CSA pursued Guerrilla Campaign?

Historical Precedent, argues that it would Not have been very Easy. (nor very successful)
As the other posters have noted, the leaders of such a campaign would, Necessarily, have been different from those who supported southern Independence, in reality.
Very few (IF Any) of the Leadership of the south, viewed the goal of southern independence as being compatible with being an outlaw state. They did not accept would not accept that they were indulging in the illegal act of Revolution, much less would they have supported the cut-throat actions of muderous outlaws.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 09-21-2007, 12:19 PM
Ozark Iron John's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Osage Beach, Missouri
Posts: 451
Default

and throughout the South, mass executions of worth less slaves. Something along the lines of what the US Army was doing to horses in that Don Johson movie, In Pursuit of Honor. Old men and women. Agitators and trouble causers. Slaves with injuries or sickenss and disease. Maybe they could've deported some of 'em to Cuba or Brazil but mass executions would've made the news up North. Headlines like "If we can't have 'em, We'll get rid of 'em!" or something like that would've gone a long ways towards silencing any/all discontent with regards to the peculiar institution.

Last edited by Ozark Iron John; 09-21-2007 at 12:22 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 09-21-2007, 12:40 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is online now
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,669
Default

Eugenics is alive and well, and living in Missouri.

As mentioned several times in previous posts such actions would have been totally incompatible with "southern honor." (There is evidence that the Partisan Rangers Acts were repealed because the CSA Congress didn't approve of the concept.)

If we can get past that point, I can easily imagine most of the south immediately getting the Sherman Treatment -- something that wouldn't have been imaginable during the first years of the war without the extreme provocation under proposal.

Stop digging, John.

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln

Last edited by ole; 09-21-2007 at 12:44 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 09-21-2007, 01:00 PM
Ozark Iron John's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Osage Beach, Missouri
Posts: 451
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ole
Stop digging, John.
I cain't help it ole. It's like that danged game, Whack-a-Reb. They just keep poppin' up! Besides, I'm just hypostulatin'.

What if that scoundrel Garrisson had been gunned down outside of Faneuil Hall and his newspaper burned to the ground?

What if them two old black men were found stung up in the Boston Commons and those black meeting houses were destroyed by a couple wagonloads of explosives parked out front late at night?

What if them goody two shoes high faluting Brahamin socialites found themselves on a slow boat with a one way ticket to Sidney?

What if old honest Abe fell under the tracks in Baltimore?

Finally, what if the slave holding aristocracy admitted that slavery was a bad thing and took steps to rid themselves of the perculiar institution?

Are you tellin' me we'd still have had to fight that horrible war?

I don't think so! Sure there'd be hell to pay. Sure some folks would be up in arms, but I don't think the South would've been provoked to seccession and I don't think the US Army would've ever had to invade the Southland.

Last edited by Ozark Iron John; 09-21-2007 at 01:40 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 09-21-2007, 01:43 PM
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,881
Default If CSA pursued Guerrilla Campaign?

Why would Union soldiers be executing their most valuable allies in locating and combatting the depredations of White terrorists?
Ex-slaves would have been of inestimable value in helping to Whack-Rebs.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 09-21-2007, 01:56 PM
Ozark Iron John's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Osage Beach, Missouri
Posts: 451
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OpnDownfall
Why would Union soldiers be executing their most valuable allies in locating and combatting the depredations of White terrorists?
Ex-slaves would have been of inestimable value in helping to Whack-Rebs.
OpnDownfall, you misunderstood me. I don't mean to suggest that the US Army would've set about exterminating slaves. There would be no need for the federal government to be invovled at all.

What I'm suggesting is what if the slave holding aristocracy of the south had made proclomations about the moral and ethical wrongness of slavery and committed to rid themselves of the peculiar institution and took the path of mass executions of their less valuable slaves as a starter?

Every plantation could've marched 10 or 15 or 100 or 200 of 'em out into the back forty and pushed 'em all in a hole. I believe that would've caused quite a stir up north. Folks would be sayin' "Hold on there, wait a minute, don't go to extremes!" I bet they wouldn't have had to kill more'n a few thousand and they'd a found themselves with a fugitive slave law that would've worked. Plus, they'd a gotten rid of all that dead weight. Slavery wasn't cheap ya'll. No matter what you think, old men and women, injured and sick, trouble makers. 90 percent of the problems come from 10 percent of the population.

Think outside of the box, ya'll. It ain't that hard to comprehend.

This "what if" has merit. We didn't have to fight that war.

Last edited by Ozark Iron John; 09-21-2007 at 02:04 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 09-21-2007, 03:38 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is online now
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,669
Default

Quote:
This "what if" has merit. We didn't have to fight that war.
And in that, John, you are finally beginning to make sense. Slavery wasn't really threatened. Heck, it was constitutionally protected. But there was a group of southern radicals that believed it was. And somewhere in there they used that fear of freed slaves running rampant through the countryside abusing and marrying white women. That sort of thing still has its followers.

It was that fear that the fire-eaters used to create the ultimate rift. There are many accounts of slave-owners and southern politicos who recognized that the worst Lincoln could do was to continue the ban on slavery in the territories. And that recognized that slaves in the territories was not a sustainable idea anyway.

But they played on the idea that "forbidden" was the hangup--nevermind the "impracticable" aspect. So they whumped up a fever around the "may not." Read an account by either Olmsted, Ried or that other guy (I'll think of his name tomorrow, but it probably Olmsted) about a guy in Kansas who was upset because he had thought about moving to Newbrasky and getting a slave or two. Now this guy didn't and hadn't owned a slave. All he knew was that land was available, but he couldn't go there because the slave he expected to own wouldn't be allowed.

This shows me, at least in this instance, there was a resentment of something that was promoted as resentful. The fact that there was little likelihood of real offense just went ziiinnnnnggggg.

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 09-21-2007, 04:29 PM
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,881
Default If CSA pursued Guerrilla Campaign?

Don't be facetious. All that has been established is that such a campaign was feasible. But it's practicability has not been established, outside of fevered imaginings.
The success of such a program seems to be dependent on the fact that the average northerner was less committed to the Union than the average southerner was to secession.
I am not so sure that the avg northerner would have been any more squeamish about hunting down and shooting confederate bushwhackers than they were about doing it to southern soldiers.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations