CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - "What if..." Discussions

Civil War History - "What if..." Discussions What if they had attacked instead of digging in...? What if he was in charge of the army instead...? Did you ever have a "What if..." question, and you weren't sure where to post it? Here's the place to ask these speculative questions!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 02-17-2007, 05:11 PM
larry_cockerham's Avatar
1st Lt. (3500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,866
Default George H. Thomas OOOOPS!

Can any of you fellows cook crow? I juggled my generals when writing earlier about Thomas helping Forrest, though he was cordial. General George H. Thomas died of a stroke at his headquarters Pacific District in 1870. The congressional hearings that 'helped' Forrest were held in 1871 by none other than William Tecumseh Sherman who also had some memory of Forrest's actions in battle. My mistake (surprise). Don, thanks very much for catching that one.
__________________
Ancestors in US Army: 13th TN Cav; 10th TN Cav; 3rd NC Inf
Ancestors in CSA Army: 48th VA; 63rd VA, 5th NC Cav; 37th NC
Wife and Grandson's CSA: 15th AL, 51st GA, 41st TN; 36th TN; GA Mil 1197 Dist

Last edited by larry_cockerham; 02-17-2007 at 05:17 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-18-2007, 07:55 PM
oneplez's Avatar
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 158
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by larry_cockerham
Can any of you fellows cook crow? I juggled my generals when writing earlier about Thomas helping Forrest, though he was cordial. General George H. Thomas died of a stroke at his headquarters Pacific District in 1870. The congressional hearings that 'helped' Forrest were held in 1871 by none other than William Tecumseh Sherman who also had some memory of Forrest's actions in battle. My mistake (surprise). Don, thanks very much for catching that one.
Not a problem! I've done the same thing so many times I'd be on a steady diet of "Crow."


You normally are very accurate with your statements and I enjoy your posts. No crow tonite.


Don
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-24-2007, 10:32 AM
oneplez's Avatar
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 158
Default Thomas in command of the AOP

To return to the original premise of this thread.

As I recall, Garfield left Chattanooga after the Batttle of Chickamauga to fulfill his duties as a representative. He topld Thomas before he left that he was going to push for his (Thomas) appointment as Commander of the AOP. Thomas demurred and as I recall, he said that "They would kill him in that area." He was very reluctant to go east. He had no representation in congress and therefore no support. Lincoln had not shown any acceptance of his generalship and I think he pegged the situation correctly.


Don
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-24-2007, 03:22 PM
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: central Indiana
Posts: 392
Default

This may be true but he may have refering to the fact that he was from Virginia. As you well know, his family had nothing to do with him and there may have been others that would have liked to do him great harm for "betraying Virginia".
__________________
Located near Indianapolis, home of Col. Eli Lilly and the Eli Lilly Civil War Museum
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-24-2007, 05:02 PM
larry_cockerham's Avatar
1st Lt. (3500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,866
Default

I suspect Thomas thought he was helping Virginia by keeping them in the Union and keeping a Union to keep Virginia in. He was that kinda guy. Such would have been the decision faced by far more than just Lee and Thomas. What would you have done? Good question. Regardless of the choice that Thomas made, his actions did nothing but bring him honor. A professional soldier he was, perhaps more.
__________________
Ancestors in US Army: 13th TN Cav; 10th TN Cav; 3rd NC Inf
Ancestors in CSA Army: 48th VA; 63rd VA, 5th NC Cav; 37th NC
Wife and Grandson's CSA: 15th AL, 51st GA, 41st TN; 36th TN; GA Mil 1197 Dist
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-14-2007, 11:21 PM
oneplez's Avatar
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 158
Default Thomas as AOP C.O.

On December 17, Thomas wrote to Garfield in Washington “You have disturbed me greatly, with the intimation that the command of the Army of The Potomac may be offered to me. It is a position to which I am the least adapted, and putting my own reputation entirely aside I sincerely hope that I may not be victimized by being placed in a position to which I would be powerless to do good or contribute in the least toward the suppression of the Rebellion. The pressure always brought against the commander of the Army of the Potomac would destroy me in a week without having advanced the cause in the least. Much against my wishes I was placed in command of this Army — I have told you my reasons —now, however, I believe my efforts will be appreciated by the troops and I have reasonable hopes that we may continue to do good service.”

It seems to me that Thomas was aware of the internecine and bruising battles going on in Lincoln's cabinet and congress. Apparently, not a political animal, he wanted no part of the above.

Aside from the political scenario, I think Thomas would have been as successful against Lee as he was against Johnston, Hood and Bragg. Thomas was subordinate to Lee in the cavalry in the old west and I think understood him very well.

While his sisters maintained their distance from GHT, his brother Ben and he carried on a correspondence during and after the war.

Don
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-14-2007, 11:36 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is offline
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,294
Default

Quote:
It seems to me that Thomas was aware of the internecine and bruising battles going on in Lincoln's cabinet and congress. Apparently, not a political animal, he wanted no part of the above.
Seems few of the western generals wanted that post. When Grant was obliged to take command in '64, Sherman begged him to run the armies from the west -- probably for the same reason.

Thanks for the insights.
Ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-15-2007, 10:51 AM
larry_cockerham's Avatar
1st Lt. (3500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,866
Default

While Sherman was trapsing through Georgia burning and making a general nuisance of himself, Thomas was in Nashville doing Sherman's paperwork and paying attention to business. Thomas was a professional general unlike Sherman who just enjoyed a good fight.
__________________
Ancestors in US Army: 13th TN Cav; 10th TN Cav; 3rd NC Inf
Ancestors in CSA Army: 48th VA; 63rd VA, 5th NC Cav; 37th NC
Wife and Grandson's CSA: 15th AL, 51st GA, 41st TN; 36th TN; GA Mil 1197 Dist
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-15-2007, 11:36 AM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is offline
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,294
Default

Quote:
...unlike Sherman who just enjoyed a good fight.
Think that over. Given a choice, Sherman nearly always avoided the direct confrontation.

Ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-15-2007, 01:38 PM
larry_cockerham's Avatar
1st Lt. (3500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,866
Default

Ole, I'll give you two points for that one. Sherman also avoided paperwork, but then the text was probably fuzzy.
__________________
Ancestors in US Army: 13th TN Cav; 10th TN Cav; 3rd NC Inf
Ancestors in CSA Army: 48th VA; 63rd VA, 5th NC Cav; 37th NC
Wife and Grandson's CSA: 15th AL, 51st GA, 41st TN; 36th TN; GA Mil 1197 Dist
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations