CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - "What if..." Discussions

Civil War History - "What if..." Discussions What if they had attacked instead of digging in...? What if he was in charge of the army instead...? Did you ever have a "What if..." question, and you weren't sure where to post it? Here's the place to ask these speculative questions!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 11-15-2006, 01:56 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is online now
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,669
Default

Quote:
Whatever, the sentiments of the armed forces, such a war would necessarily have to be a quick one, before those at home had time think about where Britain's true interests lay.
That's an excellent observation that I will refer to our English cousins. Was Parliament capable of pulling a quick one on the constituency?
Ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 11-15-2006, 05:25 PM
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,881
Default What About English Or French

The queens husband was decidedly anti-war and the Queen less than enthusiastic. The PM and his Foreign Minister, were both elderly men, who had neither the inclination nor enegy to even attempt to pull a fast one on the voting public. The south was lucky to get recognition as a belligerent.
If a local war thousands of miles away, became a world war, in which slavery and the rights of men became rallying points, it might become a war that England might not like or even win. such a war began just over four score and ten years before and the european world had been turned upside down.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 11-15-2006, 07:52 PM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 38
Default

The defence of Canada was a prime concern. In fact THE prime concern. There was a feeling the US was going north after the war no matter what, hence the constant consideration of war with the Union.

The problem with the Great Lakes as far as the US is concerned is that the links to the US river system are too small for any kind of warship, let alone something large like a Monitor. Although US shipbuilding capacity on the Lakes is larger.

Both sides need to improvise fleets on the Great Lakes (assuming the Brits don't succeed in keeping the Beauharnois Canal open, in which case dozens of RN warcraft are going to be on the Lakes).

Hitting Montreal would be interesting. It's defended by more men than are defending Washington with stronger works. It's the main staging area for the incoming regulars for example...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 11-15-2006, 08:27 PM
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,463
Default

"It's the main staging area for the incoming regulars for example..."
Don't leave off in midsentence, 67th, I want to know more!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 11-15-2006, 08:52 PM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matthew mckeon
"It's the main staging area for the incoming regulars for example..."
Don't leave off in midsentence, 67th, I want to know more!
It's where Williams had his HQ, and half the regulars he had (inc the Guards Brigade). The only bridge over the St Lawrence not slated for demolition for example was near Montreal.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 11-16-2006, 12:36 PM
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,881
Default What About English Or French

It is likely that Britain's main contribution to the Southern War effort would have been defending Canada, for the Empire.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 12-11-2006, 11:58 AM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 521
Default

But surely, the fear of those british troops coming south from Montreal would be enough to paralyze thousands of union troops, perhaps enough to allow for a different decision in the militarily decisive Western theatre. Even if those british regiments did nothing but sit there, the effect might well be decisive.

Respectfully,
Matt
__________________
Great-Great Grand Nephew of George H. Pfau, 4th NJ Vol Infantry
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 12-11-2006, 02:40 PM
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,881
Default What about the English or French......

Any thing, of course, is possible in "What If" questions, but Lincoln was a hard man to convince, when it came to giving up the cause of the Union.
The prospect of a two front war against the primier sea power of the age, would give any astute political leader pause. But, once such an occurrence became a reality, the British would have to do more than organize, transport and supply a large Army in Canada.
Lincolns actions and public opinion is problematic (it did not happen, so facts are missing) but I am sure that it may have only delayed the South's ultimate defeat, if, as is likely, Britain saw her interests in Canada as more important than those of the Confederate States of America, below the Mason Dixon Line.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 12-13-2006, 10:52 PM
samgrant's Avatar
Brig. General, Trivia Mod
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Land of Lincoln (and Grant)
Posts: 4,005
Default

Maybe the Brits, having been beaten twice, did not dare to try again. (?)
__________________
-

"It was a very peculiar time." - Franklin D. Cossitt

Ancestors in USA Army: 6th IA Inf, 11th IL Cav, 1st AL Cav; 122nd NY Inf; 6th MI Cav; 35th MA Inf; 100th IL Inf; 1st CO Inf/Cav; 22nd IN Inf

Ancestors in CSA Army: 2nd TN Inf (Walker's), 9th TN Cav (Bennett's/Ward's); 2nd TX Inf
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 12-14-2006, 01:32 AM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is online now
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,669
Default

Sam: I wouldn't say "did not dare." Maybe "thought better of" or "didn't choose to." You must have a really good reason to wade into that guy on the next bar stool. You might win, but you aren't going to come out of it without some injury. So. Is the injury worth it? Probably not. Save the fights for something important.
Ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations