CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - "What if..." Discussions

Civil War History - "What if..." Discussions What if they had attacked instead of digging in...? What if he was in charge of the army instead...? Did you ever have a "What if..." question, and you weren't sure where to post it? Here's the place to ask these speculative questions!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-12-2005, 12:12 AM
gary's Avatar
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,403
Default What if Burnsides

and not Butler had commanded the first expedition to Fort Fisher? He didn't have any bridges to stop or slow him down as he did at Antietam or Fredericksburg.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-12-2005, 10:33 AM
ewc ewc is offline
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: pittsburgh
Posts: 863
Default

But he'd have planted his HQ on the powder ship...

But seriously, the tactical decisions that boggled Butler's military mind would have been addressed by Burnside's. He had handled independent commands competently in the past; save for stone walls and bridges, had done well. He certainly would not have up and gone home without a determined effort at tackling the fort. And he had a history of cooperation with the navy. Porter wouldn't have had to worry about him and coddle him and ultimately save his tooshy like he had to do with Butler. Old Burny would have acquitted himself well, in my humble estimation. That's not to say he would have reduced the fort, which was really a tough egg to crack. But at least the Union would have realized just how much force would be required.

Would have deprived Grant and the army of one thing though, and they would have had to have waited for some other Butler- inspired disaster to rid themselves of this most worrisome general.
__________________
'It is the soldier, not the reporter, who has given us freedom of the press. It is the soldier, not the poet, who has given us freedom of speech. It is the soldier, not the campus organizer, who has given us the freedom to demonstrate. It is the soldier, who salutes the flag, who serves beneath the flag, whose coffin is draped by the flag, who allows the protester to burn the flag'

-Father Dennis Edward O'Brien, USMC.

Last edited by ewc; 08-12-2005 at 03:15 PM. Reason: cleaning up
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations