CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - "What if..." Discussions

Civil War History - "What if..." Discussions What if they had attacked instead of digging in...? What if he was in charge of the army instead...? Did you ever have a "What if..." question, and you weren't sure where to post it? Here's the place to ask these speculative questions!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-12-2005, 12:09 AM
gary's Avatar
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,404
Default

Not to hijack the thread, but I think Hood demonstrated his over aggressive nature while being a Corps Commander under Johnston. Colb's (Kolb) Farm was a pure waste of Confederate lives.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-19-2005, 06:04 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 521
Default

Since Lee attempted to resign in August of 1863, Davis should have let him or better yet, promote him out of army command and made him C in C of all CSA forces. Create a second force around him. There were enough troops scattered around the confederacy to pull together a minimum of one corp. Two of Pickett's brigades in Richmond, Ransom's troops in NC etc. Let Jackson take command of them, bringing along 2nd corp of the ANV. Do not use Jackson to reinforce the ANV, but let him cooperate in a hammer/Anvil type strategy with Longstreet commanding remnants of ANV to bleed the AOP to extinction. With Meade out of the way, there would be little need for such a heavy force along the atlantic coast. Recombine it and invade TN from the East, retake nashville and hold it. Assuming meade was crushed by the end of 1863, that gives Longstreet/Jackson enough time to coordinate with |J.E. Johnston who although recalcitrant and reluctant to share plans, Lee would order him to. In effect, you could take the part of the Jackson/Longstreet combo and use them as a swinging door moving south and east from tennesee, leaving either Jackson's Grand Corp or Longstreet's two corp ANV to protect Nashville. By doing this you would backdoor sherman trapping him between Johnston's AOT and half the Jackson/Longstreet combination.
Matt

Last edited by milhistbuff1; 11-19-2005 at 06:13 PM. Reason: missed spelling error
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-19-2005, 06:24 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 524
Default

With all due respect, while an interesting hypothesis, I'm sure you agree that the scenario is implausible.


Respectfully
__________________
Up men, and to your post! And let no man forget today that you are from old Virginia!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-19-2005, 08:07 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 521
Default

There are many things in history that are implausible, some might say our country's founding was one of them. Assuming Jackson lived and Lee got promoted in August 1863, I believe it would have been fairly likely, since it takes each person's strengths into account. Lee knew Joe Johnston from the old army and respect his abilities. Davis should have jumped at it when lee offered to resign after Gettysburg, not only would someone be coordinating the various CSA forces in the field, but davis would be shielded from fallout if it all went wrong.

respectfully,
Matt
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-19-2005, 09:36 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 524
Default

I guess we are gonna disagree on this speculative scenario since:

1) I think Jackson is greatly overrated
2) I don't agree with you that Lee is overrated

So...we might have to agree to disagree here (cordially of course)

Respectfully
__________________
Up men, and to your post! And let no man forget today that you are from old Virginia!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-19-2005, 09:53 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 521
Default

NBForrest,

I accept that we respectfully disaggree on this. What you believe would happen if Lee got promoted to overall command instead of Davis letting him resign circa August 1863?
With all due respect,
Matt

Last edited by milhistbuff1; 11-19-2005 at 09:56 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-23-2005, 09:15 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 524
Default

What you believe would happen if Lee got promoted to overall command instead of Davis letting him resign circa August 1863?

Lee as general-in-chief in 63? I doubt it would have made a difference. By August of 63 the Confederacy was well on its downward slide. As great a general as I think Lee was, the Western Theater had long been lost.
Davis was absolutely correct in not letting Lee resign though.

Respectfully
__________________
Up men, and to your post! And let no man forget today that you are from old Virginia!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-25-2005, 01:19 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 521
Default

Wouldn't Lee as General in Chief force coordination between the various armies of the CSA and thus prolong the war giving a greater chance to allow Davis's strategy of defense until the North gets tired to work.
respectfully
Matt
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-25-2005, 07:03 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 524
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by milhistbuff1
Wouldn't Lee as General in Chief force coordination between the various armies of the CSA and thus prolong the war giving a greater chance to allow Davis's strategy of defense until the North gets tired to work.
respectfully
Matt
The problem is that Davis' strategy didn't work. His Western policy ensured defeat. Certainly Lee could not have retrieved the situation in Aug of 63. Even had he been made general in chief as soon as the war started, and I believe Lee was the best either side had, it still seems to be a longshot that the South would win. The odds were just stacked against them

Respectfully
__________________
Up men, and to your post! And let no man forget today that you are from old Virginia!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-05-2006, 04:01 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 521
Default

With all due respect, the odds were even worse, when Adams, Henry, Jefferson et al took on the British Empire. With Longstreet in command of the ANV, and JE Johnston in command of the AOT, you would have a shot. No bloody mess at Chickamauga, unless it was a cassville type maneuver. Happy new year.
Respectfully
Matt
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations