Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jonreb Before the Battle of gettysburg, Lee was marching through pennsylvania virtually blind without his cavalry. Now whether this was entirely Stuart's fault is open to discussion, but I believe that Lee would have bben much better off with Stuart by his side. Could the rebs have had a deeper knowledge of the ground if Stuart had been there? |
Most certainly. Lee was trying to concentrate his scattered forces when approaching the Gettysburg area. If he had had earlier intelligence (which Stuart should have supplied) on the disposition and numbers of approaching forces, he may well have proceeded differently. If he would have been better off, is one of those what-ifs that are interesting, but speculative.
He would not have allowed the "shoe expedition" to set out. He may have pulled back until his concentration was complete. He may have decided that he didn't want to do battle against such a force and foraged his way back to Virginia -- thus leaving his forces intact for a major encounter under circumstances more to his liking. The lack of Stuart's communication was unfortunate. Without assigning blame, it ultimately led him into a situation he would not have selected.
Cest la guerre.