CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - "What if..." Discussions

Civil War History - "What if..." Discussions What if they had attacked instead of digging in...? What if he was in charge of the army instead...? Did you ever have a "What if..." question, and you weren't sure where to post it? Here's the place to ask these speculative questions!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-05-2005, 05:28 PM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Franklin, Tennessee
Posts: 146
Default Longtreet stays with the AoT?

Would the course of the war have been much different if Longstreet had stayed with the AoT after Chickamauga? His troops and leadership could have made a difference, and in the event Johnston was still replaced in front of Atlanta - he would have been the obvious choice for command of the army. What might have been different in light of this change?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-05-2005, 05:39 PM
larry_cockerham's Avatar
1st Lt. (3500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,980
Default

Longstreet would never have attacked Nashville and certainly not Franklin under the actual circumstances. My theory is that he would have been more interested in Sherman who was the main threat to the existence of the Confederacy aside from Grant. Forrest could have closed the Cowan tunnel and taken care of the Federal supply problem. Time was the problem for the Army of the Tennessee. Sherman was tightening the noose and the central command was on it's way to Georgia.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-08-2005, 09:13 AM
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 379
Default

gunny,
I don't think Longstreet would have been any better in the west. Look what he did when he was on his own. Nothing but failure. You may say"look what he did at Chickamauga".. He went through a hole that was opened for him by the other side. He never knew the hole was there till he made the charge. Not a Longstreet fan!
Martin
__________________
"I want to bury myself in a den of books. I want to saturate myself with the elements of which they are made and breathe their atmosphere until I am of it."
--Lew Wallace, 1885
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-08-2005, 11:51 PM
gary's Avatar
2nd Lt. (2500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,624
Default

Read Robert Krick's, "The Smoothbore Volley That Doomed the Confederacy." Chapters 4 & 5 are condemnation of Longstreet as a gineral. Even if you don't, consider his independent command at Suffolk and later at Knoxville. While at Suffolk he could legitimately say his only purpose was to gather supplies, he dawdled at Knoxville he came across Burnsides and after his attack failed, blamed his loss on McLaws.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-09-2005, 01:53 PM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Franklin, Tennessee
Posts: 146
Default

Yeah, I actually read a cook called General Longrstreet in the West; A Monumental Failure. It makes it clear that Longstreet was definitely better as a subordinate, and no doubt he followed orders well, but lacked imagination on his own.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-10-2005, 05:52 AM
manofdreds's Avatar
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 77
Default

I would add this: His failure at attacking when ordered at Fair Oaks. His slowness at 2nd Bull Run. Suffolk was already mentioned. His mishandling of Gettysburg second day is legandary as well as day three. No, I think Longstreet would've been just as much of a disaster in the west. I've asked this question on another board sometime ago. After Bragg's demise why wasn't Kirby Smith brought aboard to command the army of tennessee?
__________________
Fred
www.3rdusct.org


"...so Lordy, let me fight with the rifle in one hand, and the Good Book in the other..."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations