CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - "What if..." Discussions

Civil War History - "What if..." Discussions What if they had attacked instead of digging in...? What if he was in charge of the army instead...? Did you ever have a "What if..." question, and you weren't sure where to post it? Here's the place to ask these speculative questions!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-19-2004, 08:34 PM
gary's Avatar
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,376
Default

During the Steele Bayou Campaign, Porter's Squadron was trapped in narrow waters and was almost scuttled to prevent its capture by the Confederates. Happily for the Union, Sherman's men arrived (they had received a "telegraph" from a contraband named Tub who ran the message through Confederate lines for half a dollar) and saved Porter.

What if Porter's Squadron was scuttled? Grant wouldn't be ferried across the Mississippi and land on the opposite bank. The campaign to capture Vicksburg would have taken even longer as Grant would have to find another approach. I'm inclined to think that although the war would still be lost, it would have been prolonged. Thoughts?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-20-2004, 01:48 AM
unionblue's Avatar
Captain (5000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 5,533
Default

Gary,

This is one idea worth a ponder or two. I have long felt if Vicksburg could have held out and driven off Union forces, there was a good chance of the Confederacy holding on long enough for the North to get discouraged and come to a peace with the South or England and France coming to her aid. If Grant had been unable to take his men across the river, the whole thing could have been up in the air.

Remember, men, supplies and arms could have come from Texas, instead, with the fall of Vicksburg, that didn't happen.

I tend to agree with you at the very least the war may have been prolonged and the most, it might have resulted in a loss for the North.

Nice idea to chew on, thanks.

Unionblue
__________________
"The American people and the Government at Washington may refuse to recognize it for a time but the inexorable logic of events will force it upon them in the end; that the war now being waged in this land is a war for and against slavery." Frederick Douglass

"Loyalty to our ancestors does not include loyalty to their mistakes." George Santayana
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations