Quote:
Originally Posted by ole What's with the sudden attack on Tilghman?
Ft. Henry can't be Grant's because Porter had pounded it to the point where Tilghman sent all but a token force to Ft. Donelson. So Tilghman's surrender there was all but insignificant.
As Boarder pointed out, the design of the fortifications left much to be desired and their suckiness cannot be entirely laid at the feet of Tilghman.
Iuka/Corinth left him under perhaps one of the worst commanders in the entire CS army.
Oh. I get it. You're just stirring that which does not stink.
ole |
Well, I don't know that even Porter should really get credit for Fort Henry. A few days after the Fort surrendered it was under water. It only had a token force because with the rising river it clearly could not be held, so why leave men there?
I think the credit for Forts Henry and Donelson does have to go to Grant, however, because he was the one pushing to
do something while Halleck, McClellan, et al dickered. His orders did not even really include the capture of Fort Donelson but in true Grant fashion he did it anyway. But for Grant, Halleck would have taken
months to finally move on Henry and Donelson and then let the Rebels escape when he finally got there.
In addition to opening the Tennessee and Cumberland Rivers, the twin victories were also a much needed shot in the arm for Union morale at a time it really needed it.
So no matter what others say, cudos to my man Hiram Ulysses.