CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - The South & Western Theaters
Register FAQ Members List Chat Calendar Mark Forums Read

Civil War History - The South & Western Theaters Check this forum for all South and Western Theater Questions. Included are the Western, Pacific, Trans-Mississippi, & Lower Seaboard and Gulf Approach Theaters.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 03-14-2008, 06:29 PM
5fish's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 760
Default Forrest!!

What was old Forrest doing during the brake out at Ft. Donelson?

I know he sneaks across the river to avoid surrendering but what was he doing during the fighting??
__________________

"States Rights are about States Wrongs" - Jesse Jackson
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-15-2008, 12:03 AM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is offline
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,523
Default

Quote:
And Hoovers Gap & The Sam Davis House,
I am chagrined to have failed to mention the Sam Davis house. And the Forrest boyhood home.

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-15-2008, 12:07 AM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is offline
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,523
Default

Quote:
I know he sneaks across the river to avoid surrendering but what was he doing during the fighting??
Mounted infantry don't fight fixed battles. Forrest simply refused to surrender his men. He was probably disgusted with the way things were going and said, "We're outta here!" And, he didn't sneak across the river. He just went south through some rather wet territory.

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-15-2008, 12:38 AM
larry_cockerham's Avatar
1st Lt. (3500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,708
Default Forrest at Donelson

On February 12, 1862 Forrest was placed in command of about 1,300 cavalrymen. He and his men fought a series of delaying actions against Grant's advance guard, moving from Ft. Henry towards Ft. Donelson. Forrest and his men fought dismounted much of this time. On the 13th he was on reconnaisance. On the 15th he commanded the cavalry shield of the Confederate assault column and drove back Grant's right flank and opened an escape route, but the other commanders failed to utilize the opportunity. The attack on Donelson lasted several hours. Forrest captured two batteries of artillery and in the process lost his first of thirty horses killed under him. According to Michael Bradley in his NATHAN BEDFORD FORREST, HIS ESCORT AND STAFF, when informed of the infantry commander's intention to surrender that night, he snorted "To hell with that, I did not come here to surrender."

During the darkness of Feb 15-16 he led his command and a few others who joined and made his escaped to Nashville where he was placed in command by General Floyd and managed to transfer the Confederate stores to Franklin and Murfreesboro.

I guess it's obvious, Forrest wasn't exactly sitting around at Donelson or anywhere else. He continued that attitude for four years. That's how he rode into legend.
__________________
Ancestors in US Army: 13th TN Cav; 10th TN Cav; 3rd NC Inf
Ancestors in CSA Army: 48th VA; 63rd VA, 5th NC Cav; 37th NC
Wife and Grandson's CSA: 15th AL, 51st GA, 41st TN; 36th TN; GA Mil 1197 Dist

Last edited by larry_cockerham : 03-15-2008 at 12:43 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-15-2008, 04:27 PM
5fish's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 760
Default Positive !!

I will give your Western boys a token victory..

Ft. Henry may not have been a great military victory in any since but it was a great victory for the union army's character....it looks like the union army need some positive reinforcement and Ft. Henry fit the bill...

Let's be positive...
__________________

"States Rights are about States Wrongs" - Jesse Jackson
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-19-2008, 12:29 PM
5fish's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 760
Default Control?

I have a question where were the Confederate gunboats when Ft. Donelson was under siege?

It seems the union gunboats had complete control of the river with of without controlling the fronts. Even in the Mississippi river the union gunboats had complete control as well. I have read a list of confederate gunboats so they had quiet a few so where where they?
__________________

"States Rights are about States Wrongs" - Jesse Jackson
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-22-2008, 10:17 AM
larry_cockerham's Avatar
1st Lt. (3500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,708
Default

Confederate gunboats this far 'inland' from the Ohio were few and far between. There simply was no water to speak of. Remember that the Cumberland is a very narrow stream by navigation standards. Even with the Cheatham dam in place the river at Nashville today is only about 50 yards wide at normal pool. At and around Ft. Donelson and Dover there were no Confederate gunboats, only some Houston County farmboys with big cannons waiting to see what was coming up river next. They blasted a few with considerable success. What they weren't prepared for was Grant's army.
__________________
Ancestors in US Army: 13th TN Cav; 10th TN Cav; 3rd NC Inf
Ancestors in CSA Army: 48th VA; 63rd VA, 5th NC Cav; 37th NC
Wife and Grandson's CSA: 15th AL, 51st GA, 41st TN; 36th TN; GA Mil 1197 Dist
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-26-2008, 10:18 AM
5fish's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 760
Default

Larry,

From what little I have read about CSN gunboats, they mostly where used along the coast and not in the main rivers.

It looks as if the south must have thought that forts could control the river traffic on the main rivers but I think this is poor planning if that what the south was thinking..

It was just giving the north free run of the main inland rivers...
__________________

"States Rights are about States Wrongs" - Jesse Jackson
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-26-2008, 09:51 PM
Borderruffian's Avatar
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 262
Default

Could also have to do with the souths lack of boat works. Most river vessels were constructed in St Louis (never under CS control), Memphis (fell fairly early) New Orleans (also fell early) and sites in Illinios as well as Minnesota, Ohio and Indiana, all firmly under northern control.

Then again the south would never have been able to produce enough Iron to clad many boats in that Tennessee was it's biggest sheet, pig and rail road iron producer and it also fell early.

Which brings us back to Donelson and Henry and Nashville.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-26-2008, 10:09 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 920
Default If we dwell too closely on such battles

we would realize that all were near navigable water. And on navigable water, Union forces were supreme, in the end.

The United States had the steamboats, the shipyards, the repair facilities, the supply depots, the ferrying of troops aboard such ships, the movement of supplies to convenient points.
The U.S. had the rams to destroy Confederate steamer positions on waterways.
By mid 1862, Fort Henry and Fort Donelson were gone. Columbus, Kentucky was gone. Island # 10 was gone. And by mid 1862, Memphis was in Union hands.

Each place, near water; Union controlled water. Union Steamers, ironclad and transport, were the death of the Confederacy on these inland waterways.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Henry Wirz tackitt27 Civil War History - General Discussion 15 02-12-2008 03:02 PM
BAXTER, Henry USA Mark Wadsworth Terms beginning with the letter: B 0 11-13-2007 04:32 PM
LITTLE, Lewis Henry CSA sgtabj Terms beginning with the letter: L 0 09-09-2001 06:00 PM
Heth, Henry CSA sgtabj Terms beginning with the letter: H 0 09-08-2001 03:08 PM
Henry rifle raggedrebel Terms beginning with the letter: H 0 08-12-2001 06:39 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com.
Site Design Version 4.2. - Website powered by Subdreamer CMS
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations