CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - Secession and Politics

Civil War History - Secession and Politics Was it Slavery, or was it States Rights? Perhaps it was the election of Lincoln? What were the real reasons for Southern Secession and what were the political issues in this time of war? Find your answers here in the Secession and Politics Disussion.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-29-2008, 04:29 PM
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: St. Louis, Mo
Posts: 359
Default U.S. Grant On The Cause of The War

"The cause of the great War of the Rebellion against the United Status will have to be attributed to slavery. For some years before the war began it was a trite saying among some politicians that "A state half slave and half free cannot exist." All must become slave or all free, or the state will go down. I took no part myself in any such view of the case at the time, but since the war is over, reviewing the whole question, I have come to the conclusion that the saying is quite true.

"Slavery was an institution that required unusual guarantees for its security wherever it existed; and in a country like ours where the larger portion of it was free territory inhabited by an intelligent and well-to-do population, the people would naturally have but little sympathy with demands upon them for its protection. Hence the people of the South were dependent upon keeping control of the general government to secure the perpetuation of their favorite institution. They were enabled to maintain this control long after the States where slavery existed had ceased to have the controlling power, through the assistance they received from odd men here and there throughout the Northern States. They saw their power waning, and this led them to encroach upon the prerogatives and independence of the Northern States by enacting such laws as the Fugitive Slave Law. By this law every Northern man was obliged, when properly summoned, to turn out and help apprehend the runaway slave of a Southern man. Northern marshals became slave-catchers, and Northern courts had to contribute to the support and protection of the institution.

"This was a degradation which the North would not permit any longer than until they could get the power to expunge such laws from the statute books. Prior to the time of these encroachments the great majority of the people of the North had no particular quarrel with slavery, so long as they were not forced to have it themselves. But they were not willing to play the role of police for the South in the protection of this particular institution."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-29-2008, 05:34 PM
Baggage Handler #2's Avatar
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 421
Default

Short translation:
The rights of Mississippi were made to supercede the rights of Ohio in the jurisdiction of Ohio. Thus Mississippi could claim sovereignty, but Ohio could not.
This was not a condition that could last forever.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-29-2008, 06:13 PM
M E Wolf's Avatar
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,485
Default

Dear Baggage_Handler #2,

Very interesting post and words of General Grant rings true. The Fugitive Law touched President Lincoln's father, so no doubt it touched everybody else closer to the boarders of the slave states.

Thank you for sharing.

Respectfully submitted for consideration,
M. E. Wolf
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Grant on Hooker trice Civil War History - General Discussion 2 07-05-2008 10:56 PM
Grant on Burnside trice Civil War History - General Discussion 3 07-02-2008 10:28 PM
Was Grant a gun collector gary Campfire Chat - General Discussions 0 09-13-2004 10:49 PM
Grant tulip Civil War History - Secession and Politics 10 01-14-2003 09:53 PM
What did Grant think of the following? terchris Civil War History - General Discussion 9 05-22-2002 12:24 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations