CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - Secession and Politics
Register FAQ Members List Chat Calendar Mark Forums Read

Civil War History - Secession and Politics Was it Slavery, or was it States Rights? Perhaps it was the election of Lincoln? What were the real reasons for Southern Secession and what were the political issues in this time of war? Find your answers here in the Secession and Politics Disussion.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 08-07-2007, 03:55 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is offline
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,523
Default

Quote:
Why does the government that is supposedly against slavery (the "slave-power")...allow its citizens to engage in a legal slave trade?
If that isn't the silliest thing I've ever heard, it will do until the real one comes by. "Allow" is the keyword. You might say that our more recent administrations allow illegal drugs and immigration.

As for the coolies: It's my understanding that most importation was done legitimately and that the orientals themselves took up the reins and made something of themselves--much like the Irish. It also follows that some of the coolies were victimized. I'd be amazed if none were. Welcome to the human race.

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 08-07-2007, 04:20 PM
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,484
Default "Coolies" The North's Legal Slave Trade?

Before the CW slavery was legal and protected by law. After the CW slavery was outlawed.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 08-07-2007, 05:21 PM
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,362
Default

In "A Battle From the Start" the Forrest bio by Bryan Steele Wills, Forrest was considering(after the war) replacing his African American farmworkers with Chinese immigrants, but nothing came of it.

The problem with the thread title is apparently(according to the previous posting by OpnDownfall), it wasn't legal, and at least as far as the United States was considered, it wasn't slavery.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 08-07-2007, 05:26 PM
Battalion's Avatar
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,707
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matthew mckeon

The problem with the thread title is apparently(according to the previous posting by OpnDownfall), it wasn't legal, and at least as far as the United States was considered, it wasn't slavery.
That's strange.
What was the purpose of the laws passed in 1862 and 1869?
__________________
POWER & MONEY

"Your New-York bankers and merchants are shrewd people, but I never gave them credit for so much sagacity as when they took the Government Loan. It was not merely patriotism, it was a high stroke of policy. It has saved the Government, and what they will regard as equally important, saved them from a great financial disaster."

New York Times, 27 September 1861
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 08-07-2007, 05:26 PM
Battalion's Avatar
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,707
Default

..................
__________________
POWER & MONEY

"Your New-York bankers and merchants are shrewd people, but I never gave them credit for so much sagacity as when they took the Government Loan. It was not merely patriotism, it was a high stroke of policy. It has saved the Government, and what they will regard as equally important, saved them from a great financial disaster."

New York Times, 27 September 1861
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 08-07-2007, 05:37 PM
Battalion's Avatar
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,707
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ole
As for the coolies: It's my understanding that most importation was done legitimately and that the orientals themselves took up the reins and made something of themselves--much like the Irish. It also follows that some of the coolies were victimized. I'd be amazed if none were. Welcome to the human race.

ole
Sure you want to stick with that?
__________________
POWER & MONEY

"Your New-York bankers and merchants are shrewd people, but I never gave them credit for so much sagacity as when they took the Government Loan. It was not merely patriotism, it was a high stroke of policy. It has saved the Government, and what they will regard as equally important, saved them from a great financial disaster."

New York Times, 27 September 1861
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 08-07-2007, 06:01 PM
2nd Lt. (2500+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,664
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Battalion
That's strange.
What was the purpose of the laws passed in 1862 and 1869?
What do you say it was?

Tim
__________________
"Let us, then, consider all attempts to weaken this Union, by maintaining that each state is separately and individually independent, as a species of political heresy, which can never benefit us, but may bring on us the most serious distresses."
Charles Cotesworth Pinckney of South Carolina, 1740-1824, Revolutionary War soldier, one of the authors of the US Constitution in 1787, speaking at the South Carolina Ratifying Convention in 1788.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 08-07-2007, 06:28 PM
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,484
Default "Coolies" The north's legal slaves?

I think the snippets prove that it was illegal to import Coolies as slaves into the USA, AND not only chinese, but any orientals.
The issue of the legality of slavery in the USA was, at the time, (1862) still being settled. Apparently, the legality of oriental slaves was being settled at the same time; perhaps even a little, Before that of the southern slaves.


P.S. Slavery was legal in every state of the Union, Because of the ruling of Justice Taney in the Dred Scott Decision. The snippets indicate a consistent and ongoing resistence to anymore slavery in the USA.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 08-08-2007, 03:16 AM
unionblue's Avatar
Captain (5000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 5,232
Default

Battalion,

Just thought you might like to know how some in the South felt about the "Coolie" question.

Quote:
"In 1854 the [Charleston] Mercury enthusiastically raised [Leonidas W.] Spratt's banner (Spratt advocated the reopening of the African slave trade).

But in April 1857 it expressed doubts about the possibility of reopening the [African slave] trade and suggested instead the importation of coolies. Coolie laborers were cheap and could work "like the negro on Southern plantations."
From the book, A Pro-Slavery Crusade, The Agitation to Reopen the African Slave Trade, by Ronald T. Takaki, chapter five, The Loyal Opposition, pg. 104.

Unionblue
__________________
"The American people and the Government at Washington may refuse to recognize it for a time but the inexorable logic of events will force it upon them in the end; that the war now being waged in this land is a war for and against slavery." Frederick Douglass

"Loyalty to our ancestors does not include loyalty to their mistakes." George Santayana
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 08-08-2007, 11:59 AM
Battalion's Avatar
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,707
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by unionblue
Battalion,

Just thought you might like to know how some in the South felt about the "Coolie" question.


Quote:

"In 1854 the [Charleston] Mercury enthusiastically raised [Leonidas W.] Spratt's banner (Spratt advocated the reopening of the African slave trade).

But in April 1857 it expressed doubts about the possibility of reopening the [African slave] trade and suggested instead the importation of coolies. Coolie laborers were cheap and could work "like the negro on Southern plantations."
"Some" is definitely the key word.
I don't believe that idea caught on.
__________________
POWER & MONEY

"Your New-York bankers and merchants are shrewd people, but I never gave them credit for so much sagacity as when they took the Government Loan. It was not merely patriotism, it was a high stroke of policy. It has saved the Government, and what they will regard as equally important, saved them from a great financial disaster."

New York Times, 27 September 1861

Last edited by Battalion : 08-08-2007 at 12:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com.
Site Design Version 4.2. - Website powered by Subdreamer CMS
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations