CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - Secession and Politics

Civil War History - Secession and Politics Was it Slavery, or was it States Rights? Perhaps it was the election of Lincoln? What were the real reasons for Southern Secession and what were the political issues in this time of war? Find your answers here in the Secession and Politics Disussion.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #161  
Old 08-17-2006, 12:16 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 968
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by trice

I also think anyone foolish enough to say such a thing to a Union or Confederate soldier during or after the war would have been ... well, met with a strong reaction.

Regards,
Tim
Well, since i was talking about negros in the WBTS, with the example of the Coloured Sarge who led the mutiny over being payed less than whites in the 54th, because it made them slave wages, ie the same as manual labour, he was tried and executed.

He said and thought he was being treated as a slave, and died opossing it

It all depends on who youn ask, ask a Mumluk slave soldier if he is a slave and he would agree he was, and lived better than most free men, being the elite of the Army, and setting up their own Empire later on, after turning back the Mongels for the first time in Mongol history.

It will all depend on context, but slave soldiers are very common in history.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.

Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote."
Benjamin Franklin, 1759

Last edited by Hanny; 08-17-2006 at 12:37 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #162  
Old 08-17-2006, 12:30 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 968
Default

Mathew


I have no problem with Grant making such a comment, he did not free slaves undr his control untill the 14th come into operation, his overridding perspective was to win the war and remian out of politics during the conflict, the safest way to do that was to follow the Congresional statement isued on what the conflict was over, ie the Union, and not to interfere with slavery.

I find the OED standard of proof entirly persausive, going pear shaped is one that comes to mind, not appearing in print untill WW1, but quite likly used before then.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.

Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote."
Benjamin Franklin, 1759
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #163  
Old 08-17-2006, 12:36 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 968
Default

Unable to reply to post 139 which i can only see the first 2 paras of, if you want any reply then if its not to much trouble could you repost, im sure you had something intrsting in it, i just cant read it becaue of browser problems.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.

Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote."
Benjamin Franklin, 1759
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #164  
Old 08-17-2006, 01:44 PM
jkeith21's Avatar
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Alpharetta (Atlanta), GA
Posts: 104
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matthew mckeon
Dear Hanny,
It seems to boil down to "quotes are as valid as the observer's desire for them to be valid."
Or conversely, as invalid as the observer's desire for them to be invalid? as evidenced by....?

Quote:
...Did Grant say this--the answer seems to be: No.
The answer "seems".....?

Personally, it doesn't matter to me one way or the other. If the statement is inaccurate and not something Grant actually said, of course I'm embarrased to have brought to the table. However, based on what I'm seeing discussed here, it appears to be just as likely as not.

There is already enough attributable info available to show that Grant was not willing to (publicly?) hang his hat on the abolitionist's peg until after the outcome had pretty much been decided... So, what difference does it make anyway? ...other than for the sake of argument?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #165  
Old 08-17-2006, 04:59 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is offline
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,065
Default

Quote:
So, what difference does it make anyway? ...other than for the sake of argument?
Bingo!!!!!
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #166  
Old 08-17-2006, 05:12 PM
samgrant's Avatar
Brig. General, Trivia Mod
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Land of Lincoln (and Grant)
Posts: 4,085
Default Ask an Expert - Part 9

I posed the question to John Y. Simon, editor of the 26 voume Papers of Ulysses S. Grant and chairman of the "Ulysses S. Grant Association". I think we all might agree that he could supply an authoritative answer(?).

His reply:

"The statement attributed to Grant has floated about on the
internet for years, repeated often enough that some have thought it
authentic. It is not."


Sam
__________________
-

"It was a very peculiar time." - Franklin D. Cossitt

Ancestors in USA Army: 6th IA Inf, 11th IL Cav, 1st AL Cav; 122nd NY Inf; 6th MI Cav; 35th MA Inf; 100th IL Inf; 1st CO Inf/Cav; 22nd IN Inf

Ancestors in CSA Army: 2nd TN Inf (Walker's), 9th TN Cav (Bennett's/Ward's); 2nd TX Inf
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #167  
Old 08-17-2006, 05:21 PM
jkeith21's Avatar
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Alpharetta (Atlanta), GA
Posts: 104
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by samgrant
I posed the question to John Y. Simon, editor of the 26 voume Papers of Ulysses S. Grant and chairman of the "Ulysses S. Grant Association". I think we all might agree that he could supply an authoritative answer(?).

His reply:

"The statement attributed to Grant has floated about on the
internet for years, repeated often enough that some have thought it
authentic. It is not."


Sam

Could you provide the appropriate link or reference for confirmation of validity?

.... sorry... somebody had to do it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #168  
Old 08-17-2006, 05:40 PM
samgrant's Avatar
Brig. General, Trivia Mod
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Land of Lincoln (and Grant)
Posts: 4,085
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jkeith21
Could you provide the appropriate link or reference for confirmation of validity?

.... sorry... somebody had to do it.

What? Do you want to read my email?
__________________
-

"It was a very peculiar time." - Franklin D. Cossitt

Ancestors in USA Army: 6th IA Inf, 11th IL Cav, 1st AL Cav; 122nd NY Inf; 6th MI Cav; 35th MA Inf; 100th IL Inf; 1st CO Inf/Cav; 22nd IN Inf

Ancestors in CSA Army: 2nd TN Inf (Walker's), 9th TN Cav (Bennett's/Ward's); 2nd TX Inf
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #169  
Old 08-17-2006, 07:30 PM
johan_steele's Avatar
NCOIC, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South of the North 40
Posts: 4,156
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hanny
Each point in order.

Actually YOUR word was cattle, to which i replied to the imporoper use of, now cite where the slaves were treated as cattle in any work you like.

Just a few titles for you; pick one these are some of the titles that have influenced my opinions on the benevolance of slavery.

Black Resistance Before the Civil War Cheek
The Strange Career of Jim Crow Woodward.
Booker T Washigton and the Negro Place in American Life Spencer
The White Response to Black Emancipation Synnestvedt
Federal Writers Project, Alabama Slave Narratives.
Fogel & Engerman, Time on the Cross the Economics of American Negro Slavery.
Gates Agriculture and the Civil War.
Glatthaar Forged in Battle The Civil War Alliance of Black Soldiers and White Officers
McPherson, Marching Toward Freedom.
Meltzer, In Their Own Words A History of the American Negro 1619-1865
Rose,Rehearsal for Reconstruction The Port Royal Experiment
Trudeau, Like Men of War.


Already provided the case law in UK, thats another part of what you missed, just like knowing why the UK ended slavery in the ULK but not its colonies. Apparently


Becasue the point, another one that escaped you, was conscripted negros were denied the choice to pay and not serve but forced to serve, since the point about being a slave was wrong because lack of choice, the newly forced conscripted slave was denied a choice to be a soildier, payed less than a white as well.
The numbers of US conscripted negroes...fairlty insignificant from what I've found.Were they paid, fed, clothed, armed, trusted w/ govt equip? Who said the following, I may not be recalling the quote exactly. "Give a man a rifle in his hands and an eagle upon his chest and he is no longer a slave." Their pay was later adjusted... incidently it's interesting to see who pushed for the unequal pay. Was it fair? No.

Would you be willing to deliver you or your family into slavery?
__________________
Few take the trouble to understand or to view the American scene with perspective. And we Americans love to find ourselves guilty of something. However, it is never I who am guilty, but those other Americans, the past or present government or the other political party. Americans almost never find other countries guilty. It is always ourselves or our fancied influence in other countries. Louis L'amour
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #170  
Old 08-17-2006, 07:35 PM
johan_steele's Avatar
NCOIC, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South of the North 40
Posts: 4,156
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hanny
Really?, just which books say that?.
Are you suggesting that they were not? Perhaps they were willing and eager to free their slavaes... I must have missed that one. Please enlighten me as to the extent of the CS political movement to Emancipate I would be most appreciative. Perhaps a list of CS politicians who wer NOT slaveowners would be useful.
__________________
Few take the trouble to understand or to view the American scene with perspective. And we Americans love to find ourselves guilty of something. However, it is never I who am guilty, but those other Americans, the past or present government or the other political party. Americans almost never find other countries guilty. It is always ourselves or our fancied influence in other countries. Louis L'amour
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3

The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations