CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - Secession and Politics

Civil War History - Secession and Politics Was it Slavery, or was it States Rights? Perhaps it was the election of Lincoln? What were the real reasons for Southern Secession and what were the political issues in this time of war? Find your answers here in the Secession and Politics Disussion.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-03-2008, 10:07 PM
Freddy's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 505
Default

My great grandfather did not mention slavery as a reason for enlisting in July 1862. Patriotism, duty, and bounties are mentioned as reasons, but not slavery. He even mentions soldiers arguing about Lincoln's EP. Later in 1863 he does voice his dislike of slavery. I doubt before 1863 that a majority of Union soldiers were motivated to fight against slavery.
__________________
"Those who forget to remember the past are condemned to repeat it", George Santayana.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-03-2008, 10:21 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is offline
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,668
Default

One more time: Slavery was the reason for the war, not the reason a soldier fought.

A number of Union soldier soon realized (one author said even before Lincoln) that the war, even if won, would have to be fought all over again if slavery was not eliminated. Hence, the letters from the 12th Wisconsin agrees with modern historians.

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln

Last edited by ole; 09-04-2008 at 11:44 AM. Reason: Boneheaded typo.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-03-2008, 11:17 PM
timewalker's Avatar
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Flower Mound, Texas
Posts: 940
Default

Bruce Catton argues in Grant Moves South that generally the individual union soldier was at best indifferent to slavery and, at worst, was a closet supporter thereof. Abolitionists were looked on with suspicion and dislike. However, once the soldiers spent a significant time in the South and saw the effects of slavery and, even more importantly, realized that slavery in the South was aiding the Southern war effort and prolonging the war, the soldiers became anti-slavery as an expediency to end the war. Thereafter, they became very anti-slavery, seeing its destruction as the only way to bring the war to a swift and final end.
__________________
"There must be more historians of the Civil War than there were generals figthing in it... Of the two groups, the historians are the more belligerent." David Donald, Lincoln Reconsidered (1961)
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations