Star Wars as a historical parallel... that is choice and not unexpected. Hollywood as history and political commentary. hmmm one Hollywoods "finest" directors was a pedaphile wasn't he... extreme liberalism w/ truth and fact. I think I would as soon as cite the NY Times as a pillar of Journalistic integrity
On another thread long ago in the ages past of the old board I provided a precise timeline showing the distinct intent of the
CS to begin military operations against the US...
Hal or Aphillbilly, do either of you happen to have Lincoln's specific "word of honor" that he would not act to protect the interests and citizens of the US from all enemies... foreign and domestic?
Still never have received a viable answer as to why 100,000 troops were called for by Mr Davis (a former secretary of War who was quite familiar w/ the disposition and deployment of the US Army) if he had no intentions but peaceful ones. Davis Honorable? A man who had already ignored and broken his oath and word of honor, a man who attacked his nation and took great pains to tear it asunder. Honorable word from him? In the words of some Neo-Confederates should an agreement w/ him have meant anything if it was evident he intended to break his own word as he already had? Oathes don't mean anything to some... so even if Lincoln had given his word of honor (which he hadn't) that he would not honor his own oathes why should his oath or word of honor meant more than that of Davis?