CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - Gettysburg Forum

Civil War History - Gettysburg Forum Gettysburg! It's not just a National Park. It's a Civil War Battlefield. For some it's historic and storied past are almost an obsession! All related discussions are welcome here!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-27-2008, 10:56 AM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kannapolis, NC
Posts: 43
Default Armistead and Hancock

Did the two ever get to see each other at Gettysburg before Armistead died of his wounds on July 5th? As far as I know they never did.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-27-2008, 11:11 AM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 41
Default

I think that Hancock was evacuated to Philadelphia because of his wounds, but I am not sure how soon after the battle this was. I do not think they got to see each other again unfortunately.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-27-2008, 12:35 PM
diddyriddick's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC.
Posts: 554
Default

I've never heard that they did.
__________________
David

"I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person" diddyriddick
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-27-2008, 03:13 PM
M E Wolf's Avatar
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,479
Default

Dear Lo 1863,

I heard that General Hancock did briefly see and speak with General Armistead who had been wounded but, he was pressed as to lead his troops against the remainder of the attack.

There was a Captain nearby, who heard Armistead's coded "Mason" message 'my poor mother is a widow'--a distress code for Masons at that time --who took charge over Armistead. Armistead gave his possessions to the Captain for General Hancock and whatever message he had relayed.

As this took place, allegedly this is when General Winfield Scott Hancock was wounded from fragments of where the mini-ball hit his saddle and remained on the field until the engagement was decided. Then he was taken to the field hospital.

Armistead lingered for two days--really shocked the doctors that he died but, it is very possible that Armistead was so depressed to begin with--having made a promise to Hancock before parting ways for different sides; that should he ever raise a hand against Hancock--he wanted God to strike him dead--Hancock and Armistead were like brothers, Reynolds was killed and that was one of the trio deep and sincere friendships--hearing Hancock critically wounded--he could have died from a broken heart.

The package Armistead gave to Longstreet before Pickett's immortal charge --was his personal bible. His wife and children had died and was a widower now. He loved his friends deeply--so, they were 'family.' It was to be given to Mrs. Hancock.

Just some thoughts.

Respectfully submitted for consideration,
M. E. Wolf
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-27-2008, 04:27 PM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 41
Default

The Captain who found Armistead was named Harry Bingham and I believe there is some sort of monument on the Gettysburg battlefield to mark where this meeting occurred.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-27-2008, 04:33 PM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kannapolis, NC
Posts: 43
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by William View Post
The Captain who found Armistead was named Harry Bingham and I believe there is some sort of monument on the Gettysburg battlefield to mark where this meeting occurred.
Yes, there is one. I have missed it all three times I have been to Gettysburg. It's in the National Cemetery though.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-27-2008, 04:35 PM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by "Lo" 1863 View Post
Yes, there is one. I have missed it all three times I have been to Gettysburg. It's in the National Cemetery though.
I haven't had the opportunity to visit Gettysburg yet, but I would've expected it to be somewhere around "The Angle" where Armistead was wounded.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-27-2008, 04:55 PM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kannapolis, NC
Posts: 43
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by William View Post
I haven't had the opportunity to visit Gettysburg yet, but I would've expected it to be somewhere around "The Angle" where Armistead was wounded.
Yeah, me too. They do however have a monument to Armistead on the spot to which he fell.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-27-2008, 06:11 PM
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 376
Default

IIRC, the monument that you guys are talking about commemorates the Mason's, North and South, who fought during the Battle of Gettysburg. The meeting I think took place in the Angle (and no, Tom Chamberlain was not there, as the movie depicted the wounding of Armistead) and after that Armistead was moved to the Spangler farm, where he lingered for two days and then died. I have not heard of Hancock and Armistead meeting for a last time, but I would see it as highly unlikely, seeing as both were wounded very seriously and Hancock was evacuated from the field ASAP. Though, if they had, I am sure it would have been a poignant meeting, and many tears shed. It gives credence to the term a brothers war, for, though they were not related, they were as close as brothers, and ended up fighting one another. A sad, sad story, yet very moving.
__________________
"The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize." George Washington, Farewell Address, 1796

http://tothegloryoftheunion.blogspot.com/
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-11-2008, 01:56 AM
MasonicCav's Avatar
Cadet
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lancaster, PA
Posts: 12
Default Friend to Friend Monument

Yes, you are correct. The Monument is a Masonic monument located on the National Cemetary Annex on Steinwher Ave.

It depics General Armistead surrendering his masonic pocket watch to fellow Freemason and Union Captain Henry Bingham an aide on General Hancocks staff.
All three men Armistead, Bingham and Hancock were Freemasons.

The actual site is at the "angle" southwest of the old cyclorama center on cemetary ridge marked by a marble monument in the area where General Armistead had fell by Cushings Battery.

The Monument itself was placed there by the Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania (Freemasons) and the National Park Service in 1993 to commemorate the members of the Masonic fraternity who fought in both the Confederate and Union forces.

Its back off the road on top of the hill and if you park by the Dobbins House Tavern its right across the street.

Please, Check back. I intend to do a whole series in forum on Freemasonry and the American Civil War.

Jonathan Welch PM
Charles M. Howell Lodge # 496 F&AM
Millersville, (Lancaster County) PA
Scottish Rite Valley of Lancaster and Harrisburg
Philalethes
35th Battalion Virginia Cavalry PACS affiliation

Last edited by MasonicCav; 06-11-2008 at 03:07 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why Hancock? whitworth Civil War History - Gettysburg Forum 14 10-05-2008 01:58 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations