CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - Gettysburg Forum

Civil War History - Gettysburg Forum Gettysburg! It's not just a National Park. It's a Civil War Battlefield. For some it's historic and storied past are almost an obsession! All related discussions are welcome here!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-26-2008, 10:44 AM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 984
Default Confederate attack on Little Round Top

We know the cost to Confederate infantry in their attack on the Little Round Top area on July 2nd and 3rd.

But was the objective, defensible by the Confederates? Could Confederate infantry hold Little Round Top, if it was captured? Without artillery?

Could the ANV bring up artillery, if much of Cemetery Ridge and Cemetery Hill remained in Union control, with their artillery located there? Could the Confederate infantry sustain a lodgment near AoP lines with their inferior artillery?

Has anyone seen a study of this issue?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-26-2008, 11:46 AM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is online now
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,025
Default

The value of Little Round Top was only in that it marked the extreme edge of Union forces. Seems that it was all but useless as a base for artillery. It might be that posessing it gave access to the Union's back door and supply line, but I don't see how that access could have been expoited.

Interesting question. Let's see what the others have to say.

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-26-2008, 12:21 PM
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,710
Default Confederate attack on LRT

Lee's intentions are so murky, that it is difficult to discern how important the RT's were to him. From the record it seems they did not play any important part in his planning of Longstreet's attack.
The 'only' reason LRT was attacked at all, apparently, was the initiative taken by Hood to extend his right to get around the unexpected Union forces in the Devil's Den area. In the process, disobeying Longstreet's explicit orders.
Capturing LRT was not Hood's intent, getting over and around it so that he could attack the rear of Union forces defending the extreme right of the Union defenses.(Sickle's corps).
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-26-2008, 12:34 PM
larry_cockerham's Avatar
1st Lt. (3500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,817
Default

Taking little roundtop would have at least kept Jeff Daniel's off tv! Our Alabama boys could have given the defense of the place one helluva try. Not enough bullets, men were getting scarce as well. There were more than enough yanks up the ridge to have retaken the summit. JEB Stuart and a few hundred cavalrymen showing up at the right time to the east might have made things interesting, at least for a while. Not being able to separate the main line with Pickett's advance was the problem. I'm with Ole and the others, the day was done as far as the roundtops were concerned.
__________________
Ancestors in US Army: 13th TN Cav; 10th TN Cav; 3rd NC Inf
Ancestors in CSA Army: 48th VA; 63rd VA, 5th NC Cav; 37th NC
Wife and Grandson's CSA: 15th AL, 51st GA, 41st TN; 36th TN; GA Mil 1197 Dist
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-26-2008, 09:49 PM
Dred's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 558
Default

I don't believe they had enough impetus to hold them.. but as the NY regiments were out of ammo as well... how much could they have rolled up before the Yanks reinforced the remaining flank? Alot of damage could have been cause d and a panic could have stripped forces away from the other side where they were also needed. THen the middle truly might have been weekend for day 3.
__________________
"In mortal combat, a man may and will become so infuriated by the din and dangers of a bloody fight that his heart will turn to stone and his every de sire [be] for blood."

John Hadley, 7th Indiana after the battle at Port Republic
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-27-2008, 01:31 PM
gary's Avatar
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,404
Default

If the Confederates captured Little Round Top, they would have flanked the Union and compelled Meade to withdraw. Meade could form new defensive lines, but he'd be restricted as to the road he use if he had to withdraw. The Emittsburg Road would have been controlled by the Confederates. The Taneytown Road was subject to rifle fire from the Round Tops. This leaves only the Baltimore Pike was available for retreat. If that was captured, Meade would have been encircled, his army demoralized and perhaps even compelled to surrender.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-28-2008, 07:59 AM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 984
Default Moving Confederate artillery to Little Round Top

"If the Confederates captured Little Round Top, they would have flanked the Union and compelled Meade to withdraw."


I doubt this would have happened. First, we know that Little Round Top would have not been captured easily and quickly. The Confederate infantry was unsupported by artillery. They certainly were low on musket ammunition.
Would Little Round Top be more than a lodgment, without the capture of the adjoining Cemetery Ridge?

Could Confederate infantry stay on Little Round Top without artillery? Could Lee get any artillery onto Little Round Top and would he, not knowing the strength of the AoP on Taneytown Road. The ANV was very careful not to lose any of their artillery, especially a battery.

One thing I think certain. Confederates on Little Round Top would not proceed and capture Taneytown Road. The AoP had their Reserve Artillery nearby in fields off Taneytown Road. Confederate infantry, without artillery, against AoP artillery and infantry would not have worked.

The Confederate attack on Little Round Top had one great disadvantage. It was not an attack in depth. It could not proceed beyond the protection of their artillery. If Confederate artillery cannot get onto Little Round Top, or be effective there, the captured objective is at best a lodgment; a lodgment that at best was temporary. Without the adjoining capture of Cemetery Ridge, I have high doubts the Confederates would or could move artillery to Little Round Top.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-28-2008, 12:06 PM
cw1865's Avatar
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Riverdale, NJ (Morris County)
Posts: 1,129
Default Little Round Top

Quote:
Originally Posted by whitworth View Post
One thing I think certain. Confederates on Little Round Top would not proceed and capture Taneytown Road.
Well, to be precise, by being on Little Round Top, you might not fully control Taneytown Road, but you will Army of Potomac under fire if they attempt to use it, ie. by being there the road is no longer useful to Meade.

The problem is that just by being there, the Confederates would be between Meade and DC. The only way Meade could re-establish between ANV and AOP would be by pulling back through Baltimore Pike and then re-imposing himself between the Confederates and DC.

I do agree that the Confederates are going to have a hard time getting artillery up there.

PSYCHOLOGICALLY, do you think Union soldiers are going to stick on Cemetary Ridge looking to their left and knowing the Confederates are there?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-28-2008, 01:16 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is online now
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,025
Default

If a lodgement was made, and that's not impossible, what could it have done more than musketry to impede progress on Taneytown Road? (I'll take your words that it was within range and sight.)

Would there have been a brigade there? Seems that the other brigades were a bit tied up at the moment. On that road were several divisions of infantry. Beyond that road was the reserve artillery.

It is true that Confederate survivors were also looking at the right flank of the Federal Army some distance away on Cemetary Ridge. Could they (and they were low on ammunition with little hope of immediate re-supply) have posed a serious threat to that flank?

It is also true that the Federals on the ridge and hills were preoccupied with problems of their own, so Confederate occupation of Little Round Top might have caused some consternation.

Given that the Confederates' collective fangs had been pulled, and that Union troops and artillery had them virtually surrounded -- however occupied -- could there be any realistic possibility of turning the Federal left flank?

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-29-2008, 09:30 PM
5fish's Avatar
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,063
Default Whitworth!

Quote:
Originally Posted by whitworth View Post
"If the Confederates captured Little Round Top, they would have flanked the Union and compelled Meade to withdraw."


I doubt this would have happened. First, we know that Little Round Top would have not been captured easily and quickly.

.

Note: If the confederates had attacked early in the morning like at dawn, LRT would have fallen without much of a fight for it was lightly manned.

I agree with the Whitworth with the confederates holding LRT, Meade would have been forced to leave the field of battle in Lee's hands.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A three pronged attack on Day Three? FSPowers Civil War History - Gettysburg Forum 32 02-13-2008 07:55 PM
A Savage Cowardly Attack on a Surrendered Confederate General formerYank Civil War History - General Discussion 5 07-28-2007 05:20 PM
Round 786 ole Civil War History - General Discussion 6 03-09-2007 12:17 PM
Attack and Die gary Book & Movie Review Tent 21 09-01-2006 11:26 PM
Gathering Round scone The Mason-Dixon Gazette 0 08-17-2005 10:38 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations