CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - Gettysburg Forum

Civil War History - Gettysburg Forum Gettysburg! It's not just a National Park. It's a Civil War Battlefield. For some it's historic and storied past are almost an obsession! All related discussions are welcome here!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-22-2007, 11:40 AM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 982
Default Circular for Burial Parties -Gettysburg

[CIRCULAR.] HEADQUARTERS ARMY OF THE POTOMAC,
July 4, 1863.
Corps commanders will detail burial parties to bury all the enemy’s dead in the vicinity of their lines. Correct accounts of the numbers buried will be kept, and returns made, through corps headquarters, to the assistant adjutant-general. The arms, accouterments, &c., will all be collected, and turned over to the ordnance officers. Re-ports of the number and kinds of each picked up will be reported to these headquarters.
By command of Major-General Meade:
S. WILLIAMS,
Assistant Adjutant- General.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-29-2007, 12:02 AM
samgrant's Avatar
Brig. General, Trivia Mod
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Land of Lincoln (and Grant)
Posts: 3,852
Default

Yesser, General, but what about this mess of guts all over the place?

-
__________________
-

"It was a very peculiar time." - Franklin D. Cossitt

Ancestors in USA Army: 6th IA Inf, 11th IL Cav, 1st AL Cav; 122nd NY Inf; 6th MI Cav; 35th MA Inf; 100th IL Inf; 1st CO Inf/Cav; 22nd IN Inf

Ancestors in CSA Army: 2nd TN Inf (Walker's), 9th TN Cav (Bennett's/Ward's); 2nd TX Inf
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-14-2007, 03:33 PM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 35
Default

When a general fell near enemy lines were they usually given special burials or returned to the other side?? I guess what I am trying to say was, were burial details ordered to seperated generals usually or did they say there was no time for that and just mass bury everyone regardless of rank.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-14-2007, 05:20 PM
Dred's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posts: 557
Default

Generally in my readings when I come across officers killed I find that colonels and generals might be sent back, but anythign under that was usually bureid en mass. Especially Generals. I can't imagine that a general would be buried in a mass grave at that time.
__________________
"In mortal combat, a man may and will become so infuriated by the din and dangers of a bloody fight that his heart will turn to stone and his every de sire [be] for blood."

John Hadley, 7th Indiana after the battle at Port Republic
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-14-2007, 10:22 PM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 35
Default

Col. Winfield Peters, Q. M. Gen. Army of Northern Virginia had this to say in a personal letter about Garnett's death:


"General Garnett was killed while leading his brigade in Pickett's charge across the field and up the slope between the two contending battle lines. Immediately after the great artillery duel, during which many of the enemy's guns were silenced, orders came for the general advance of Pickett's division, but it was not until we had covered nearly the entire distance between the two lines that the General received his death wound. "I was struck down (hit in the forehead by a fragment of shell) about 100 yards from the clump of trees near the ****hest point reached by our brigade (reduced to a mere handful), now indicated by a bronze tablet; also the place is marked where General Garnett was killed. Semi-conscious, my blood almost blinding me, I stumbled and fell among some rocks, severely injuring my knee and preventing further locomotion. The last I saw of General Garnett he was astride his big black charger in the forefront of the charge and near the stone wall, just beyond which is marked the ****hest point reached by the Southern troops. The few that were left of our brigade advanced to this point.


"General Garnett was gallantly waving his hat and cheering the men on to renewed efforts against the enemy. I remember that he wore a black felt hat with a silver cord. His sword hung at his side. After falling among the rocks I lost sight of him. Captain Campbell, retiring from the front with a broken arm, came to me. During the next 15 minutes the contending forces were engaged in a life and death struggle, our men desperately using the butts of their rifles, during all of which I could detect our regimental colors to the ****hest point reached.
"At this time a number of the Federals threw down their arms and started across the field to our rear. Two of these deserters came to the clump of rocks where the Captain and I were and asked to be allowed to assist us to our rear, obviously for mutual safety, and the kind proffer was accepted. These men told us that our brigade general had been killed, having been shot through the body at the waist by a grape shot. Just before these men reached us General Garnett's black war horse came galloping toward us with a huge gash in his right shoulder, evidently struck by a piece of shell. The horse in its mad flight jumped over Captain Campbell and me. "General Garnett wore a uniform coat, almost new, with a general's star and wreath on the collar, and top boots, with trousers inside, and spurs. It is, therefore, inexplicable that his remains were not identified."
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-15-2007, 09:49 AM
Cadet
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 10
Default

Quote:
Col. Winfield Peters, Q. M. Gen. Army of Northern Virginia had this to say in a personal letter about Garnett's death:
There's something fishy about that letter.
Peters was NOT the QM of the ANV at Gettysburg.
And furthermore,
Why in the world would a Quartermaster General of the entire ANV be taking part in the PPT charge?

I don't doubt the letters validity but I think it should be credited to a soldier of the line.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-15-2007, 03:08 PM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 35
Default

Yea, my bad, the letter was written by a Private James W. Clay 18th Virginia Infantry
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-15-2007, 10:50 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is offline
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,991
Default

Good catch, Lefty. Appreciate the followup, tackitt. Looks like we've gotten most of the answer. It sounds like he was close enough that cannister "pattern" would still have been concentrated enough to take him off his horse.

This seems to contradict that the General's horse was found uninjured. Comments?

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-16-2007, 10:20 PM
samgrant's Avatar
Brig. General, Trivia Mod
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Land of Lincoln (and Grant)
Posts: 3,852
Default

Well, where can we find this letter/account of this Clay?

-
__________________
-

"It was a very peculiar time." - Franklin D. Cossitt

Ancestors in USA Army: 6th IA Inf, 11th IL Cav, 1st AL Cav; 122nd NY Inf; 6th MI Cav; 35th MA Inf; 100th IL Inf; 1st CO Inf/Cav; 22nd IN Inf

Ancestors in CSA Army: 2nd TN Inf (Walker's), 9th TN Cav (Bennett's/Ward's); 2nd TX Inf
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-17-2007, 02:29 PM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 35
Default

http://www.gdg.org/Research/SHSP/shgarnet.html

Here is a website when I did the search. It was an article written in the Baltimore Sun from like 1905 or something. Hope this helps.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations