CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - Gettysburg Forum

Civil War History - Gettysburg Forum Gettysburg! It's not just a National Park. It's a Civil War Battlefield. For some it's historic and storied past are almost an obsession! All related discussions are welcome here!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-19-2006, 01:45 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 982
Default You couldn't say it Thomas A. Desjardin...

but General Governeur K. Warren did not discover the Confederates moving towards Little Round Top and thereby save the Union. Some soldier with a telescope with the U.S. Signal Corps already on Little Round Top did that.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-22-2006, 03:12 PM
Miss Markie's Avatar
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 237
Default I do believe that is what most of the LBGs at Gburg say

At least the two fellows I have had the pleasure of touring with. Warren 'rushed to the hill' in response to a soldier with a telescope, as you say. But it was certainly Warren who had the rank to get troops to position there... is that what you all are saying?
__________________
"Live in the world you inhabit. Look upon things as they are. Take them as you find them. Make the best of them. Turn them to your advantage." - R. E. Lee
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-22-2006, 10:05 PM
samgrant's Avatar
Brig. General, Trivia Mod
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Land of Lincoln (and Grant)
Posts: 3,852
Default

Whit, could you some how consolidate your threads, it's getting too confusing for me.
__________________
-

"It was a very peculiar time." - Franklin D. Cossitt

Ancestors in USA Army: 6th IA Inf, 11th IL Cav, 1st AL Cav; 122nd NY Inf; 6th MI Cav; 35th MA Inf; 100th IL Inf; 1st CO Inf/Cav; 22nd IN Inf

Ancestors in CSA Army: 2nd TN Inf (Walker's), 9th TN Cav (Bennett's/Ward's); 2nd TX Inf
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-23-2006, 09:21 AM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 524
Default

Neither of Desjardin's books really impressed me. They didn't shed any new light on anything, although they were billed as destroying myths. I suppose they did prove myths wrong...but myths that have been recognized as incorrect for decades. If Desjardin demolished these myths for people who hadn't heard them before, then he did a good thing. But I think for the more hardcore buff, there wasn't much there. There were plenty of other controversies he could have examined but neglected to. I don't think he raked up the muck enough about Little Round Top. Again, he stripped away some of the hyperbole, but only the hyperbole and myths that have already been recognized as such. Although a reevaluation of Little Round Top is probably best done in its own book.

Respectfully
__________________
Up men, and to your post! And let no man forget today that you are from old Virginia!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-23-2006, 09:04 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 982
Default OK, Desjardins didn't jump on the barbed wire

But all the historians I've read, failed to some degree on Gettysburg.

My problem with Desjardins is he worked for the National Park Service at Gettysburg and he's from Maine. I expected more!

The problem is Gettysburg is a tourist attraction! The fact it was a battlefield is only incidental, now. Gettyburg was a great battle. Even if the battle is different than the one that the historians paint.

Since, Robert E. Lee could never make an error in the mind of historians, the history of the battle was always going to come out differently, than what really happened. That's a shame. It really was a great battle, affected by errors and a lack of information.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-24-2006, 02:00 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 524
Default

I'm not sure that I agree with the Lee comment. It is very true that to many people (some historians included) Lee can do no wrong. But there is an equally vocal group of people (some historians included) that are very critical of Lee, some to the point of questioning his competency. I think that at the current time most historians are fairly even handed when it comes to Lee and if anything, probably are more apt to point out his errors since they never were pointed out in the past.

Respectfully
__________________
Up men, and to your post! And let no man forget today that you are from old Virginia!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-24-2006, 10:54 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is online now
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,991
Default

Lee's feet, like everyone else's, were of clay. He made mistakes. But he remains one of the world's great generals, all of whom also made mistakes. His accomplishments will ever be idolized and villified. Such is the lot of the truly great.
Ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-24-2006, 11:43 PM
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,432
Default

I liked "Honored Dead" although losing the Joshua Chamberlain, 20th Maine myth was a wrench.

This is from Ole, forrest and others comments about Lee.

Lee's greatest asset wasn't his military skill, but his ability to get his officers to work as a team and inspire his men. He had a real group of touchy, sensitive prima donnas, with a keen sense of their own worth, and he got the best out of them with a minimum of infighting. Davis couldn't do that, Johnson couldn't, Beauregard couldn't, Bragg certainly couldn't.

They felt their honor was safe with Lee. How did he do that? The recent book about Lincoln's cabinet "A Team of Rivals" addresses how Lincoln made his group of prima donnas work. Lee's manners and methods were very different from Lincoln, but he welded a group of individuals who were sometimes on the point of killing each other, and made them work!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-03-2006, 12:44 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 982
Default The Rest of the Story

For those unfamilar with Gettysburg, there is a statue of General Governour Warren, a staff officer of General Meade, who "discovered" that the Confederates were attacking Little Round Top. The inference is that the Army of the Potomac had its incompetency and that Warren saved the day.

Warren did move troops to defend Little Round Top. But he didn't discover the movement of Confederate forces. The U.S. Signal Corps was on Little Round Top since dawn on July 2, signalled that information by flag to Meade's headquarters. Warren was sent to make an assessment and did his job. He moved troops in to defend it.

The idea for the statue, came to defenders of Warren, who felt that Warren was unjustly relieved of duty as a corps commander by General Sheridan, just before the surrender of Lee. They picked Gettysburg for the statue and the rest is history.

One sometimes needs a good story, with enough malarkey, to put a lone statue on Little Round Top. General Warren did not discover Confederate movement on July 2 and save the Army of the Potomac and the country.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-03-2006, 03:53 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 524
Default

The Little Round Top affair in general is still exaggerated and overplayed. Desjardin does strip away some of the myths, but I don't think he delves into it enough. Someone really needs to rake up the much about Little Round Top. In Stand Firm Ye Boys From Maine, it just seemed to me that Desjardin wasn't willing to fully explore the controversies of the hill. He seemed to rest generally on the side of Chamberlain's version of events without totally backing it up (maybe a Maine connection being the cause?) More work to be done on that little hill, to be sure.

Respectfully
__________________
Up men, and to your post! And let no man forget today that you are from old Virginia!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations