CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - Gettysburg Forum

Civil War History - Gettysburg Forum Gettysburg! It's not just a National Park. It's a Civil War Battlefield. For some it's historic and storied past are almost an obsession! All related discussions are welcome here!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-23-2006, 10:56 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 521
Default Glenn Tucker Gburg Hypothesis

In High Tide at Gettysburg Glenn Tucker mentions Genl. Lee suggesting " an Army in Effigy" being created from Corse and Jenkin's bdes, 44th NC inf. of Pettigrew, 3 rgts of Cavalry + whatever else, Genls Elzey and DH Hill could spare from the Depts in the Carolinas and placing it under Genl Beauraguard. in CSA dept of NC the bdes of Cooke Colquit Martin, Clingman and Micah Jenkins+ whatever else was scattered around. If posted at Culpepper in a position to threaten Washington DC, is it likely that the AOP would have met with failure against the ANV, assuming AOP were forced to detach corp in order to deal with Gen. PGTB? ref. pgs 37-38 of HTG by tucker
__________________
Great-Great Grand Nephew of George H. Pfau, 4th NJ Vol Infantry

Last edited by milhistbuff1; 02-23-2006 at 10:59 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-24-2006, 03:51 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 524
Default

I don't know how seriously Lee viewed the idea, but I doubt that Washington would have been suckered in. Even assuming they detached a corps it would not significantly reduce the odds.

Respectfully
__________________
Up men, and to your post! And let no man forget today that you are from old Virginia!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-24-2006, 08:43 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 521
Default

you dont believe removing 10-20 thousand men from the equation would have done anything? Odds are, Meade would be denied access to the sixth corp at the very least. If Lee wasnt serious why bother sending it to Davis in the first place?
Respectfully,
Matt
__________________
Great-Great Grand Nephew of George H. Pfau, 4th NJ Vol Infantry
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-24-2006, 08:55 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 524
Default

I just can't see Washington taking away an entire corps, especially the largest corps in the AOP. Even if the VI Corps was taken away from Meade, it wouldn't have mattered. It was hardly used at Gettysburg. I seriously doubt that Washington would panic over a handful of men at Culpeper. Washington was safe. Obviously the Union command was not worried about Confederates in central VA given that they allowed Spears' small brigade to roam about the South Anna River.

Respectfully
__________________
Up men, and to your post! And let no man forget today that you are from old Virginia!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-24-2006, 09:37 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 521
Default

The thing is, it would be at least a couple divisions under a more than competent commander, if nothing else, the threat couldnt be ignored, Lockwood's bde of 12th probably wouldn't have been released either
Respectfully
Matt
__________________
Great-Great Grand Nephew of George H. Pfau, 4th NJ Vol Infantry

Last edited by milhistbuff1; 02-24-2006 at 10:12 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-25-2006, 10:08 AM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 524
Default

I guess I'm just not convinced of an Union overreaction. Since Lee didn't go through with the plan, I'm guessing he didn't have much faith in it either. Also remember that besides the defenses of Washington and a possible diversion by Dix towards Richmond, there was still an entire brigade of the PA Reserves guarding the Orange and Alexandria RR. They would have tipped off Washington quite well as to the truth of the diversion, as would the cavalry brigade of the Washington defenses.

Respectfully
__________________
Up men, and to your post! And let no man forget today that you are from old Virginia!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-25-2006, 12:26 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is offline
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,028
Default

We often forget that the Washington defenses were incredibly (and perhaps overly) formidable. Grant had no difficulty in tapping the forces when he wanted them during the overland campaign.
Ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-25-2006, 01:36 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 521
Default

NB, it wasn't Lee who was inactive, Lee sent the recomedations to Davis, who then sat on them instead of taking action that might help his own cause.
Matt
__________________
Great-Great Grand Nephew of George H. Pfau, 4th NJ Vol Infantry
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-25-2006, 08:00 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 524
Default

I just don't think Washington would have scared so easily. By that stage, Washington was well guarded after the scares of 1862. I mean, there was an entire army corps guarding Washington! I don't think that a handful of Rebs at Culpeper would have rendered some huge advantage to Lee.

Respectfully
__________________
Up men, and to your post! And let no man forget today that you are from old Virginia!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-01-2006, 06:44 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 984
Default The Washington Defense

Most historians ignore the Washington artillery defenses and how poorly the ANV was supplied. The ANV was at the bottom of the logistics bucket and any significant reserve might have been hard press to stay even two days, more than five miles from Richmond.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations