CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - Gettysburg Forum

Civil War History - Gettysburg Forum Gettysburg! It's not just a National Park. It's a Civil War Battlefield. For some it's historic and storied past are almost an obsession! All related discussions are welcome here!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #221  
Old 08-21-2007, 12:39 AM
cw1865's Avatar
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Riverdale, NJ (Morris County)
Posts: 1,215
Default Sickles

There's no such thing as 'ending' a thread on Sickles. Big Sickles fan over here, don't get me started!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #222  
Old 08-21-2007, 04:19 AM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is offline
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,662
Default

Just when you thought it was safe to go back to the second day...........grrrrUMP.....grrrrUMP......grrUMP grrUMP grrrUmp.
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #223  
Old 08-22-2007, 02:42 PM
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,879
Default Dan Scikles, Uion Savior?

I have always wondered, why was Longstreet massing to attack the Peach Orchard? It was not occupied at first and could have just. marched his corps into it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #224  
Old 08-22-2007, 09:12 PM
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,094
Default The Future has Meaning

Dan Sickles, the "union savior" never again commanded a corps in the Army of the Potomac.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #225  
Old 08-22-2007, 10:39 PM
cw1865's Avatar
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Riverdale, NJ (Morris County)
Posts: 1,215
Default Up Emmitsburg Rd

Quote:
Originally Posted by OpnDownfall
I have always wondered, why was Longstreet massing to attack the Peach Orchard? It was not occupied at first and could have just. marched his corps into it.
Longstreet's orders are to attack up the Emmitsburg Road and hit the Federal Left which after the end of Day 1 was still north of the Peach Orchard. Longstreet really isn't massing for an assault on the Peach Orchard, Sickles just kind of winds up being in the path of the previously planned assault.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #226  
Old 08-22-2007, 10:41 PM
cw1865's Avatar
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Riverdale, NJ (Morris County)
Posts: 1,215
Default Wounded

Quote:
Originally Posted by whitworth
Dan Sickles, the "union savior" never again commanded a corps in the Army of the Potomac.
True, but he is carted off of the field and he does lose his leg. In the Civil War this obviously doesn't seem to stop people from being in command (Hood is quite the example).
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #227  
Old 08-23-2007, 10:36 AM
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,879
Default Dan Sickles, Union Savior?

From what I have read here, is that the Confederate attack stretches from the Peach Orchard to not quite the base of LRT.
When Longstreet sites McLaws forces perpendicular to the Emmitsburg Road, Lee countermands him and sites McLaws paralell to that road (much to Longstreets displeasure).
To me the question becomes was Longstreet and Lee on the same page, as to how the attack was to develop? If not, whose fault is it; Lee and his famous indirect instructions (orders?) or Longstreet's fixation on maneuvering causing him to misunderstanding Lee's intentions?


P.S. Of course, the more basic question concerning Sickles movement, was his corps sufficient to defeat Lee's plan of attack (whatever it was) if he had remained on the low ground to Hancocks's left? Confederate Corps were almost twice as big and Union Corps and Meade had apparently not made precise plans for reinforcing his Left, if it came under an overwhelming attack sooner than he expected.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #228  
Old 08-23-2007, 02:21 PM
cw1865's Avatar
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Riverdale, NJ (Morris County)
Posts: 1,215
Default Plan vs. Events

Quote:
Originally Posted by OpnDownfall
From what I have read here, is that the Confederate attack stretches from the Peach Orchard to not quite the base of LRT..
This is actually what develops, you have to remember that Hood hooks around Sickles to an empty Little Round Top because Sickles is in the way. Lee is looking to hit the Federal left flank (which on Day 2 becomes the Union Center). If Sickles isn't in the Peach Orchard he isn't going to be assaulted. This is the core of my 'Sickles Defense' - from the events of the day we do know that Anderson gets some units through, but they can't do anything with the penetration. If Hood and McLaws land on the same spot, that is a lot of firepower; question is does it cause a breakthrough? (We'll never know)

Quote:
Originally Posted by OpnDownfall
When Longstreet sites McLaws forces perpendicular to the Emmitsburg Road, Lee countermands him and sites McLaws paralell to that road (much to Longstreets displeasure).
To me the question becomes was Longstreet and Lee on the same page, as to how the attack was to develop? If not, whose fault is it; Lee and his famous indirect instructions (orders?) or Longstreet's fixation on maneuvering causing him to misunderstanding Lee's intentions?..
I don't think Longstreet misunderstands Lee, I think Longstreet simply disagrees with Lee and is not vigilant in putting the plan into action. Longstreet doesn't believe the Confederates should be launching any attack and favors the slip around the flank and receive a Federal attack plan (he believes in the strategic offensive/tactical defensive); this is why Longstreet's reputation has received a boost in recent years, because its not a war favoring attackers.


Quote:
Originally Posted by OpnDownfall
P.S. Of course, the more basic question concerning Sickles movement, was his corps sufficient to defeat Lee's plan of attack (whatever it was) if he had remained on the low ground to Hancocks's left? Confederate Corps were almost twice as big and Union Corps and Meade had apparently not made precise plans for reinforcing his Left, if it came under an overwhelming attack sooner than he expected.
If Sickles stays in position, the Confederate punch hits Hancock, not Sickles. From the events in the Peach Orchard, its clear that Sickles' corps is insufficient to defeat the entire punch; but it does absorb a major portion of the blow.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #229  
Old 08-23-2007, 05:38 PM
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,879
Default Dan Sickles, Union Savior?

Such a scenario, would imply that Lee and/or Longstreet did not know where the Union Left was, with any degree of accuracy.
I believe Hood reported that he was surprised to be facing a Union Line of Battle as he Lined his Divion up to attack, apparently well to the South of LRT and his later movements to include that Hill in his attack, was his attempt to get around the eastern flank of the Union forces facing south towards him.
Is it possible Lee thought Hancock's left was the terminus of the Union left?
I think there is little doubt that Sickle's forward movement did disrupt the confederate attack on the Union position on Cemetary Ridge (wherever Lee thought that was) because 3d Corps was not where the Confederates expected them to be.
In the end, 3d Corps was overwhelmed by superior numbers and if they had received the attack in their original unfortified Cemetary Ridge position, would not superior numbers have told, anyway?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #230  
Old 08-23-2007, 10:35 PM
cw1865's Avatar
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Riverdale, NJ (Morris County)
Posts: 1,215
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OpnDownfall
In the end, 3d Corps was overwhelmed by superior numbers and if they had received the attack in their original unfortified Cemetary Ridge position, would not superior numbers have told, anyway?
Sickles would be covering the end of Cemetery Ridge terminating his line at the Round Tops, if he had stayed in position. Hancock would of course be on Sickles right. I believe the Confederate assault is aimed at Hancock's left which after Day 1 is the Federal left. As such, I don't think Longstreet's assault would've hit Sickles at all.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations