CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - Gettysburg Forum
Register FAQ Members List Chat Calendar Mark Forums Read

Civil War History - Gettysburg Forum Gettysburg! It's not just a National Park. It's a Civil War Battlefield. For some it's historic and storied past are almost an obsession! All related discussions are welcome here!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-19-2005, 10:56 PM
samgrant's Avatar
Brig. General, Trivia Mod
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Land of Lincoln (and Grant)
Posts: 3,792
Default Shoes, Myth or Fact at Gettysburg

Have heard various versions about whether or not the Confeds (Heth...)
went to Gettyburg to get some shoes, Or Not, for their shoe deficient troops, thereby ancidentialy precipitating this crucial battle.

Some simply state this, others say it is an absured myth.

Let's settle this!

Was it about the shoes, or not?
__________________
-

"It was a very peculiar time." - Franklin D. Cossitt

Ancestors in USA Army: 6th IA Inf, 11th IL Cav, 1st AL Cav; 122nd NY Inf; 6th MI Cav; 35th MA Inf; 100th IL Inf; 1st CO Inf/Cav; 22nd IN Inf

Ancestors in CSA Army: 2nd TN Inf (Walker's), 9th TN Cav (Bennett's/Ward's); 2nd TX Inf
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-20-2005, 01:58 AM
maryingettysburg's Avatar
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 56
Default Per the NPS Rangers........

Sam,
we went on some Ranger walks this summer, and per the NPS stance, the battle was NOT about shoes. They've pretty much all debunked that myth. There was NO shoe factory in the town at the time, and the local supply was not adequate for the ANV's supposed needs. Nor is it logical to think that anyone would deem finding shoes more important than finding food.....

so, being a native of Gettysburg, I grew up believing it was all about shoes, only to learn now that it wasn't.
__________________


.."This was the turning point; if won
By Southern arms their work was done.
Were ours the day, a Northern sun

Would shine as now o'er Gettysburg..."

Brevet Major R. Watson Seage, 4th Michigan
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-20-2005, 02:13 AM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is offline
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,523
Default

Sam:

The story about shoes is amusing, therefore it hangs on. I can't definitively say it wasn't about shoes, but then, I've always wondered why the ANV thought they could find a significant supply in Gettysburg.

Gettysburg was a fair sized town at the time. It may be more likely that the expedition was exploratory and aimed more for buttered bisquits and cider than shoes. It might have been as simple as exploring the territory next to the point where Lee was trying to concentrate his troops (gasp).

When you come up with your answer, please let me know. I'd appreciate another explanation.
Ole
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-20-2005, 09:52 AM
johan_steele's Avatar
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South of the North 40
Posts: 3,677
Default

Desjardin pretty conclusively debunks the myth that it was about Shoes, there was no shoe factory in the town at the time, there were several drygoods stores that would have contained shoes... but enough to make a difference? I don't think so.

My own belief is that Heth got sucked into a battle, thinking he was facing some militia he thought to brush them aside take some prisoners, get a little glory. Then it was cav... My troops can't be pushed back by Cav... Oh ****... that's I Corps! HELP!!! Here comes the whole AoP! And thus the battle continued to escalate as both sides threw more troops into the mix. A lot of relation ot a good old barroom brawl... w/ arty.
__________________
Shane Christen
American Legion Post 352
SUVCW Camp Abernethy# 48
Lifetime NRA member
3rd MN VI

For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow. Eccl 1:18
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-22-2005, 06:22 AM
manofdreds's Avatar
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 77
Default

Its also been agreed by the scholars of gettysburg that Heth created this story to vindicate himself of his error. Things would've been different if Stuart was there. Getting back to Heth, his blunders should go hand in hand with Longstreet's. Maybe some board members can answer this question that perplexes me and this is in reference to Heth marching order of his brigades. If Pettigrew reconnoitered the area the day before on June 30th why was he moved to third in line behind Archer and Davis? he already had picketts out overnight and more than likely exchanged some fire with Buford's vedettes. Another question: Why would Heth lead his Division with Pegram's artillery battalion?
__________________
Fred
www.3rdusct.org


"...so Lordy, let me fight with the rifle in one hand, and the Good Book in the other..."
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-22-2005, 07:19 AM
VS on the belt plate's Avatar
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 165
Default On Henry Heth

Pettigrew's people really does make more sense to send in first ,at least on paper. Pettigrew had the largest brigade in Heth's division.

All I can think is that General Archer and his Brigade had considerably more combat experience. Maybe that influenced the General's thinking. Of course that fails to account for the inclusion of Davis' Brigade which was as inexperienced as Pettigrew's Brigade.

Bad day for our friend Henry, Wednesday July 1,1863

VS..etc


Last edited by VS on the belt plate : 08-22-2005 at 09:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-22-2005, 04:45 PM
ewc ewc is offline
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: pittsburgh
Posts: 863
Default

From what I understand, there is some truth to this myth, but it was not Pettigrew looking for shoes, but Early, who passed through Gettysburg, brushing away the militia from the place, a week earlier on his way to the Susquehanna River crossings and a possible move on Harrisburg. And it was not looking for shoes, per se, but a rumor that shoes might be found in some quantity in town, either through manufacture or as a Union depot i don't recall. But indeed Early's men were 'foraging' for any and sundry useful goods for the Confederacy, particularly horses, wagons, grain, shoes, and the like- including sending all Negroes found 'back' South, and would gladly commandeer anything of value in return for Confederate script.

Anyway, Hill would know of Early's passage and also know that little of value to him would remain on hand. So at the very least, the myth of the battle owing its inception to shoes as handed down over the years is indeed bun***.
__________________
'It is the soldier, not the reporter, who has given us freedom of the press. It is the soldier, not the poet, who has given us freedom of speech. It is the soldier, not the campus organizer, who has given us the freedom to demonstrate. It is the soldier, who salutes the flag, who serves beneath the flag, whose coffin is draped by the flag, who allows the protester to burn the flag'

-Father Dennis Edward O'Brien, USMC.

Last edited by ewc : 08-23-2005 at 02:31 AM. Reason: freakin asterisks!!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-23-2005, 02:25 AM
manofdreds's Avatar
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 77
Default

Agree VS, very bad day for Heth as well as AP Hill.
__________________
Fred
www.3rdusct.org


"...so Lordy, let me fight with the rifle in one hand, and the Good Book in the other..."
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-25-2005, 01:11 PM
FSPowers's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 546
Default

My studies of the "shoes" story came up with the following observations:

1. Gettysburg was hardly an industrial area (Thaddeus Stevens' steel mill not withstanding). It was connected by rail to the east, but not to the west, so transport would be a problem.

2. The population level would not support maintaining a large supply of shoes, at least not enought to outfit even a regiment.

3. Early had been there before and found no shoes.

4. The information about militias may have originated with a brief engagement between Early and the 21th Penn. Emergency Regiment that previous week.

5. If this was just a raid, why did Hill expand the attacking force to almost his entire corps?

It seems to me that Heth was burned by a brief encounter with what he thought was militia and wanted some payback.
__________________
F. S. Powers

Union Ancersor: Pvt Arnuah Norton, 60th Ohio. (G-G-G Grandfather) Died at Salisbury NC, November 3, 1864

Confederate Ancestors: Captain Thomas A. Morrow, 29th Texas Cavalry (G-G-G- Uncle) and 2LT George W. Morrow, 31st Texas Cavalry (G-G-G Grandfather). Both survived the war

My blog: http://fspowerscw.blogspot.com

My Book; http://stores.lulu.com/store.php?fAcctID=1900736

Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-26-2005, 05:33 AM
manofdreds's Avatar
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 77
Default

I don't mean to be redundant on this subject but somewhere in all of this, someone disobeyed orders. I'm looking at AP Hill. The orders were not to bring on an engagement. Why would Hill condone sending a whole division and a artillery battalion. Did Hill's sickness kick in between the 30th of June and the 1st of July. It was these same orders that handcuffed Ewell's decision making on day one. Go figure. Hill knew of these orders yet he sent a message to Ewell telling him of his intentions. This baffles me to no end. Where's that fly on the wall when you need him.
__________________
Fred
www.3rdusct.org


"...so Lordy, let me fight with the rifle in one hand, and the Good Book in the other..."
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com.
Site Design Version 4.2. - Website powered by Subdreamer CMS
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations