CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - Gettysburg Forum

Civil War History - Gettysburg Forum Gettysburg! It's not just a National Park. It's a Civil War Battlefield. For some it's historic and storied past are almost an obsession! All related discussions are welcome here!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-09-2005, 07:58 PM
cof's Avatar
cof cof is offline
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 26
Default "PICKETT'S CHARGE"

The term “Pickett's Charge” is a Misnomer

No phrase is more absolutely without foundation in fact than the term “Pickett's Charge.” There were in that historic charge 48 regiments and 2 battalions. Of these, General Pickett commanded 15 regiments in the 3 brigades in the right center, composing his division, and no more. There were 11 brigades, and he commanded only 3. The order for the charge was given to General Longstreet, and the official Reports show that he was in sole and actual command of it.

In the right wing of the charge there were 23 regiments, i. e., 4 from Alabama in Wilcox's brigade, and 4 from Florida in Perry's brigade—these 2 brigades being commanded by General Wilcox. To his left, being thus the right center of the charge, was Pickett's division of 3 brigades commanded by Armistead, Garnett, and Kemper. The left of that division was given the line of direction, which was the “clump of trees” on Cemetery Ridge.

In the left wing there were 25 regiments and 2 battalions, i. e., 5 North Carolina regiments (4 in Pettigrew's brigade and one in Davis’); Davis’ Mississippi brigade of 3 Mississippi regiments and one North Carolina regiment; Archer's Tennessee brigade, containing one Alabama regiment and one Alabama battalion, and 3 Tennessee regiments; and Brockenborough's 3 Virginia regiments and one battalion — all these under Pettigrew, commanding Heth's division, and General Heth had been wounded. In the second line of that wing (also practically under Pettigrew) there were the 10 North Carolina regiments of Scales and Lane, under Trimble, making a total of 48 regiments and 2 battalions in the whole line. Pickett's division, in the right center, also marched in two lines—two of his brigades in the front line and one in the second line.

Pickett had no command, as the officers’ reports show, of any of these troops, except the 15 Virginia regiments in his own division.

General Pickett and his staff stopped at the Codori house, 600 yards from the wall, and did not cross the Emmetsburg Pike. The charge from Seminary Ridge, where it started, to the wall on Cemetery Ridge, in front of Pickett, was 1,400 yards. To the wall in front of the left wing, where the North Carolinians went, was 1,480 yards. It is true, General Pettigrew was wounded near the wall, still in command of his division, and that two of Pickett's brigadier generals were killed and the other was wounded, all near the wall, but in stopping at the Codori house, 600 yards behind his line, General Pickett was in rear of the center of his division and in regulation distance.

The fact that he stopped at the Codori house, in rear of his division, has no significance, except that it shows, if any additional proof were needed, that he was in command only of his own division. General Longstreet, who was in command of the entire charge, was in the rear of the center of the charge, and only advanced a short distance with the men, as it was necessary for him to have supervision and oversight of the movements of the entire charge.



[14]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maj. W. M. Robbins, who was for years one of the United States Battlefield Commissioners at Gettysburg, wrote an article, “Longstreet's Assault at Gettysburg,” which is printed in Vol. 5, Clark's Regimental Histories, pp. 101-112, in which he states that it was “Longstreet's Assault” and that Pickett commanded only the 3 brigades of his own division, and, further, that the correspondents of the press at Richmond were responsible for the slander upon the North Carolinians, Tennesseeans, Alabamians, Mississippians, and Brockenborough's Virginians, which composed the left wing. Indeed, Brockenborough's Virginians were on the extreme left, and being fired into on their flank by the 8th Ohio Regiment, was the first brigade on the left to give way. On the right, Wilcox's division, having gone astray, Stannard's Vermont command, especially the 13th and 16th Vermont, fired into the right flank of Kemper's command and broke the force of their charge.

All soldiers know that in that charge all the troops did well, and there is glory enough to go around. All that the North Carolinians, Tennesseeans, Alabamians, Mississippians, and Brockenborough's Virginians have sought to do is not to question in any particular the conduct of the 15 regiments under Pickett's command, but to refute the slander by certain correspondents of the Richmond press at that time, that the 25 regiments and 2 battalions on the left wing did not do their duty.

The following is taken from the returns of the Army of Northern Virginia of our losses at Gettysburg, printed in “44 U. S. Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies,” pp. 338-346:

Pickett's division: Fifteen Virginia regiments; killed, 214; wounded, 940; prisoners, 1,499.

Heth's division, commanded by Pettigrew: The five North Carolina regiments in the first line lost 229 killed, 1,074 wounded, no prisoners. Adding the two North Carolina brigades of Lane and Scales, the 15 North Carolina regiments which were in the charge lost in the battle of Gettysburg 372 killed, 1,745 wounded, and 110 prisoners, which was a much heavier loss than the 15 Virginia regiments in Pickett's division.

There were also in the left wing Brockenborough's 3 regiments and one battalion from Virginia, which lost 25 killed, 123 wounded, and 148 prisoners. Archer's 3 Tennessee regiments and one regiment and one battalion from Alabama lost 16 killed, 144 wounded, and 717 prisoners; and Davis’ 3 Mississippi regiments (excluding 55th N. C. Regiment in that brigade, already mentioned) lost 141 killed and 548 wounded.

In the whole battle there were 770 North Carolinians killed—nearly twice as many as the 400 from Virginia who were killed.



Address of Chief Justice Walter Clark before N. C. Confederate Veterans Association, Durham, N. C., 24 August 1921.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-09-2005, 09:57 PM
johan_steele's Avatar
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South of the North 40
Posts: 4,074
Default

In period letters from CS Troops I have seen it refferred to as Longstreets Grand Attack, Longstreets Grand Assault, Longstreets Folly and several others, I have never seen it referrenced as Picketts Charge by a CS vet who was there in letters during the War. Pickett certainly didn't call it that either. Interesting how history gets written eh?
__________________
Few take the trouble to understand or to view the American scene with perspective. And we Americans love to find ourselves guilty of something. However, it is never I who am guilty, but those other Americans, the past or present government or the other political party. Americans almost never find other countries guilty. It is always ourselves or our fancied influence in other countries. Louis L'amour
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-10-2005, 05:24 PM
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 298
Default

cof -

"No phrase is more absolutely without foundation in fact than the term “Pickett's Charge.” " I suppose it could be worse - it could be called Buford's Charge and then we'd have the wrong side charging as well. :-)

Seriously, I've come to call it the PPT charge. I think that fits, and it distinguishes that from Longstreet's assault of the 2nd.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-10-2005, 06:36 PM
tomh's Avatar
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gettysburg, PA
Posts: 230
Default PPT's Assault

cof, russ_aukerman,

Good point. Most of the historians here call it PPT's Assault or Longstreet's Assault (too easy to confuse with Longstreet's day2 assault). Since the books generally refer to it as Pickett's Charge the guides tend to stay with that name when talking to visitors.

However, I have also heard it called Lee's Folly and Lee's Grand Mistake.

Personally, I prefer PPT's Assault.

TomH
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-15-2005, 05:49 PM
samgrant's Avatar
Brig. General, Trivia Mod
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Land of Lincoln (and Grant)
Posts: 4,005
Default a question

What does 'PPT' stand for?
__________________
-

"It was a very peculiar time." - Franklin D. Cossitt

Ancestors in USA Army: 6th IA Inf, 11th IL Cav, 1st AL Cav; 122nd NY Inf; 6th MI Cav; 35th MA Inf; 100th IL Inf; 1st CO Inf/Cav; 22nd IN Inf

Ancestors in CSA Army: 2nd TN Inf (Walker's), 9th TN Cav (Bennett's/Ward's); 2nd TX Inf
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-15-2005, 06:10 PM
tomh's Avatar
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gettysburg, PA
Posts: 230
Default PPT's Assault

samgrant,

Pickett, Pettigrew and Trimble, the three division commanders involved in the assault. Pickett actually was commander of only about 4,500 of the troops involved (Armistead's, Garnet's and Kemper's brigades), and they made up the CS right.

Pettigrew's brigade was part of of the 1st day's action (Heth's Division/Hill's Corps) but his troops suffered the least casualties of any of Hill's corps because of their late involvement in the action. They were also a new brigade and one of the largest in the ANV. When Heth was wounded, Pettigrew assumed command of the division and led the remnants of the division on the 3rd day (his brigade, supplemented by survivors of Archer's and Davis's brigades). They made up the left of the CS first line.

Trimble is one of my favorite CS generals, a former railroad man and considered by some to be the best dressed of the CS Generals. Best dressed or not, he certainly was a colorful character and a stickler for following orders and was assigned to Ewell's corps as an advisor/attache on his return from hospital. After the first day, Trimble requested a transfer based on his perception that Ewell had failed to complete his assignment in "taking that hill if practicable". To placate Trimble, Lee placed him in charge of the remnants of Pender's Division (Pender having been wounded on day 1) and his troops were placed to the right rear of Pettigrew.

Hope this helps,
TomH

Last edited by tomh; 08-15-2005 at 06:15 PM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-16-2005, 02:02 AM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is online now
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,657
Default

cof:
There a lot of similar misnomers re TWBS. In this forum you can get away with the battle between the "Virginia and the Monitor." Out there, most wouldn't know what you are talking about.

We call the war itself pretty much everything we feel it should be called. Out there, it's the Civil War.

The famous 3rd day disaster is the same: out there, it's Pickett's Charge, but we know it wasn't.

By the way, I'm downloading your post to include in my Gettysburg file. Thanks for posting it.

Ole
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-25-2005, 03:23 PM
FSPowers's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 546
Default

In my Masters Thesis on Gettysburg, I made reference to the charge as the "Pickett-Pettigrew-Trimble" charge. I got that from one of my sources and I thought it quite accurate.
__________________
F. S. Powers

Union Ancersor: Pvt Arnuah Norton, 60th Ohio. (G-G-G Grandfather) Died at Salisbury NC, November 3, 1864

Confederate Ancestors: Captain Thomas A. Morrow, 29th Texas Cavalry (G-G-G- Uncle) and 2LT George W. Morrow, 31st Texas Cavalry (G-G-G Grandfather). Both survived the war

My blog: http://fspowerscw.blogspot.com

My Book; http://stores.lulu.com/store.php?fAcctID=1900736

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-08-2005, 09:20 PM
TexasRebel1980's Avatar
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: The Republic Of Texas
Posts: 53
Default

It just goes to show you how the Yankees over the years have re written the battle to suite their needs. From what little I know, I have always heard it called Longstreet's attack on the Peach Orchard.
__________________
Confirmed GR GR Grandson of William Francis McNeese. Served in Grey's Company; 37th Texas Cavarly.

Gr Gr Nephew of 1st Cpl. John B. Sinclair. Co. K 28th Texas Cavarly; Walker's Texas Division. AKA The Greyhound Division.

God Bless Texas
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-09-2005, 12:43 AM
VS on the belt plate's Avatar
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 165
Default The 3rd Day

Naw..Longstreet's action at the Peach Orchard was on the 2nd day.

Pickett was not up on that day.

Vs..etc


Last edited by VS on the belt plate; 10-09-2005 at 12:53 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations