CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - Gettysburg Forum

Civil War History - Gettysburg Forum Gettysburg! It's not just a National Park. It's a Civil War Battlefield. For some it's historic and storied past are almost an obsession! All related discussions are welcome here!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-03-2003, 01:56 PM
rivrrat's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 533
Default

I just don't think we should let this day go by with out remembering the brave men on both sides who lost their lives on this day in 1863.

(Message edited by RivrRat on July 03, 2003)
__________________
Doug
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-15-2004, 04:24 PM
gunsmoke
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I've read, where Gen. Lee, either ordered or requested Gen. Pickett, to not file a report, on the battle at Gettysburg. From, what I understand Pickett never filed, a report. Does anyone know why Lee never wanted a report filed?

Gunsmoke
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-15-2004, 07:51 PM
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Dillsburg, PA
Posts: 1,640
Default

There's a long-standing rumor that Pickett did prepare a report, but that Lee ordered it to be torn up because it was so critical of the Confederate high command for ordering the charge that resulted in the decimation of Pickett's division.

No copy of the report exists today, so there is no concrete evidence that it was ever prepared.

However, Pickett is known to have said afterward, referring to Lee, "That old man had my division destroyed at Gettysburg," or words to that effect. In view of that lasting bitterness, it seems fair to speculate that, if Pickett had prepared a report, it would have been every bit as critical as the rumored report was supposed to have been.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-15-2004, 07:59 PM
gary's Avatar
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,404
Default

Pickett's bitterness remained long after the war and when he complained in the presence of Mosby, Mosby replied that Lee had made Pickett immortal.

Kinda witty, but that's not the type of immortality I'd want. Kinda like being asked to be Burnsides at Fredericksburg if you asked me.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-16-2004, 12:07 AM
gunsmoke
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Thanks for your replies, this was something that I had been wondering about.

Gunsmoke
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-16-2004, 12:46 AM
scone's Avatar
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mt. Juliet Tennessee
Posts: 2,132
Default

In the Movie Gettysburg Pickett was itching a ready to go into the fight..

I know this is a fictional movie but based on fact..

Is there any proof without Pickett's report that he was this excited to go into battle.
__________________
Steven Noel Cone
Living Historian and Battlefield Preservationest
"Silver Spring Mess" ; "Citizens of the Bonnie Blue" ; "46th Tn Inf. Co. K"
SCV Camp 723 General Robert H. Hatton
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-16-2004, 10:10 AM
gunsmoke
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In a book of letters, that Pickett, wrote home, he states that as he rode into battle that he was so sanguine, and sure of success!
In checking on the meaning of sanguine, my dictionary states its "having a warm, and cheerful, and hopeful nature."

Gunsmoke
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-01-2004, 10:20 AM
gunsmoke
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In researching out some information, on Gen. Lewis Armistead C.S.A.
I came across two versions on his death. One states, that he fell mortally wounded, on the Gettysburg battlefield, while the other version, states, that the wounds he received were only flesh wounds, and shouldn't have resulted in death. It continued to state, that he may have actually died from heat stroke, due to making Picketts charge, in the heat of the day, while wearing a heavy wool uniform. The union doctors noted that he was exhausted, and was running a fever, when they checked out his wounds. The other possibility, that was given, was he may have picked up an infection, due to the unsanitary conditions, while his wounds were being treated.
I was wondering if anyone has any positive information on this?

Gunsmoke
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-01-2004, 01:11 PM
johan_steele's Avatar
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South of the North 40
Posts: 3,853
Default

Charlie, I'm fairly convinced he was mortally wounded shortly after he stepped over the wall. I don't think an infection had time to kill him.
__________________
Shane Christen
American Legion Post 352
SUVCW Camp Abernethy# 48
Lifetime NRA member
3rd MN VI

For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow. Eccl 1:18
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-05-2004, 12:30 AM
gunsmoke
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In doing a little more research, I came across the information, where General Armistead was treated, at the 11th Corps hospital, by Dr. D.G. Brinton. He recorded that Armistead had been wounded in the the flesh areas, of the lower leg, and upper arm area. No damage was done to the bone, nerves, or arteries.
In talking with Lew, he found him to be suffering from over exertion, and mental anxiety, and need of sleep. Less than two days later Armistead died, surprising the doctors, who figured that death was caused by secondary causes, instead of the wounds.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations