CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - Gettysburg Forum

Civil War History - Gettysburg Forum Gettysburg! It's not just a National Park. It's a Civil War Battlefield. For some it's historic and storied past are almost an obsession! All related discussions are welcome here!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 01-10-2005, 01:15 AM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is offline
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,657
Default

Larry.

For someone who has every reason for selective reasoning, you show a refreshing regard for logic.

Away from the action, Sherman was excitable, irritable and impatient -- hardly the qualities of a leader. However, give him an army and a goal and he became considerably different. Perhaps the best evidence of his excellence is the confidence of his superiors. That's a general!

Ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-12-2005, 04:13 PM
FSPowers's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 546
Default

I thought this thread was about J.N.O. Buford.

Wheather his men had repeaters or not, it was a real gutsy move to put two brigades of cavalry in front of what turned out to be two corps (Hill from the west, Ewell from the north). Even with a battery of US artillery.
__________________
F. S. Powers

Union Ancersor: Pvt Arnuah Norton, 60th Ohio. (G-G-G Grandfather) Died at Salisbury NC, November 3, 1864

Confederate Ancestors: Captain Thomas A. Morrow, 29th Texas Cavalry (G-G-G- Uncle) and 2LT George W. Morrow, 31st Texas Cavalry (G-G-G Grandfather). Both survived the war

My blog: http://fspowerscw.blogspot.com

My Book; http://stores.lulu.com/store.php?fAcctID=1900736

Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-20-2005, 09:56 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 524
Default

Buford's role in the war is greatly exaggerated, I think. I have never seen any evidence to support the assertion that he somehow developed the idea of having cavalry fight dismounted. It just doesn't really make any sense.

A fine cavalryman, but not some tactical innovator.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-20-2005, 10:47 PM
samgrant's Avatar
Brig. General, Trivia Mod
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Land of Lincoln (and Grant)
Posts: 4,005
Default

Cavalry dismounted.

http://murray.francis.com/medieval/misc.html

http://www.shoshone.k12.id.us/medieval/siege2.htm

http://www.deremilitari.org/resource...es/mcglynn.htm

It would appear that from these sites that the concept of "cavalry dismounted" was nothing new.
__________________
-

"It was a very peculiar time." - Franklin D. Cossitt

Ancestors in USA Army: 6th IA Inf, 11th IL Cav, 1st AL Cav; 122nd NY Inf; 6th MI Cav; 35th MA Inf; 100th IL Inf; 1st CO Inf/Cav; 22nd IN Inf

Ancestors in CSA Army: 2nd TN Inf (Walker's), 9th TN Cav (Bennett's/Ward's); 2nd TX Inf
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-20-2005, 10:56 PM
r_moody's Avatar
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: La Mirada, California
Posts: 152
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nbforrest
Buford's role in the war is greatly exaggerated, I think. I have never seen any evidence to support the assertion that he somehow developed the idea of having cavalry fight dismounted. It just doesn't really make any sense.

A fine cavalryman, but not some tactical innovator.
I agree. Forrest was an innovator that had the opportunity to do so. Buford did not have that luxury. Working within the AOP was trying at best. He was a true old soldier type who recognized opportunity and made the decision to fight without the promise of support. A very gutsy move. Though I believe he felt that Reynolds would not hold out on him once Reynolds knew he was committed.

His troopers primarily used the Sharps Carbine; the early ones that used paper cartridges. They were prone to bursting in battle as they leaked small amounts of powder. As soon as the troops learned to keep them clean, they were a formidable weapon. The most accurate carbine of the war.

Rick
__________________
"We made a great mistake in the beginning of our struggle.... We appointed all our worst generals to command our armies, and all our best generals to edit the newspapers"
- Robert E. Lee


The Battle Flag of The Madison Light Artillery (Louisiana)
MOODY'S BATTERY - 24 Pound Howitzers
Alexander's Battalion
Longstreets Corps


Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-22-2005, 03:20 AM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is offline
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,657
Default

There is only one fact that stands out in this particular discussion. Buford's people held off two corps of the Confederates' best until the US First Corps arrived, led by those dammed Black Hat Fellas.

Calicoboy, here is where you get to toss your slouch hat in the air and yell something approximating huzzah!

Ole
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-22-2005, 12:21 PM
Calicoboy's Avatar
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 295
Default Huzzah

Indeed, the first troops that arrived with Reynolds were the Iron Brigade. I do not have to tell you that I regard them as the best troops in the Army of the Potomac. Although they were greatly outnumbered and left vunerable when the Union corp on their right collapsed, they stood their ground and made one heck of a fight. I believe their sacrifice allowed the Union army to gain the high ground on Cemetary Ridge. However, the few survivors that reassembled on Culp's Ridge were pathetically few. They had paid the price for their valour. After Gettysburg, the Iron Brigade was so decimated that they literally ceased to exist as a unit. I have always been saddened by the heavy loss of the Brigade on July 1st, 1863. But they were brave lads and they were the "tip of the spear" that day. I hope you will all, Yank and Reb alike, give a big "huzzah" to the valour of the Iron Brigade>

Calicoboy
__________________
My dear mother:- I have come safely through two more terrible engagements with the enemy, that at South Mountain and the great battle of yesterday (Antietam). Our splendid regiment is almost destroyed. We have had nearly 400 men killed and wounded in the battles. Seven of our officers were shot and three killed in yesterday's battle and nearly 150 men killed and wounded. All from less than 300 engaged. The men have stood like iron....Maj. Rufus Dawes, 6th Wisconsin Volunteers
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-22-2005, 01:18 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: VA
Posts: 524
Default

Indeed, the first troops that arrived with Reynolds were the Iron Brigade.


Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't Cutler's brigade the first infantry to deploy and get in the fight on July 1?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-23-2005, 04:30 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ill.
Posts: 529
Default

nbforrest,
Correct. Cutler's brigade was ready first when orders came for the march forward to Gettysburg, so led. The Iron Brigade followed 1 1/2 miles behind the 2nd Maine Battery, commanded by Capt. James A.Hall which was following Cutler.
Chuck in IL.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-23-2005, 08:17 PM
Calicoboy's Avatar
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 295
Default indeed

Indeed, Cutler's men were the very first to reach the outskirts of Gettysburg, The Iron Brigade was right behind them. Cutler's men fought valiantly; but they were flanked on both sides and were in grave danger. While the rest of the Iron Brigade drove Archer's men on the left ("If we can't hold it, where will you find men who can?"), the 6th, with a 100 man honor guard (20 from each regiment) were in reserve. As the 14th Brooklyn and the 95th New York attempted to stem the rebel tide, the 6th formed on their right. The battle at the unfinished railroad cut is the stuff of legends.

Calicoboy
__________________
My dear mother:- I have come safely through two more terrible engagements with the enemy, that at South Mountain and the great battle of yesterday (Antietam). Our splendid regiment is almost destroyed. We have had nearly 400 men killed and wounded in the battles. Seven of our officers were shot and three killed in yesterday's battle and nearly 150 men killed and wounded. All from less than 300 engaged. The men have stood like iron....Maj. Rufus Dawes, 6th Wisconsin Volunteers

Last edited by Calicoboy; 10-23-2005 at 08:18 PM. Reason: mis-spelling
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations