CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - General Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Chat Calendar Mark Forums Read

Civil War History - General Discussion For Discussions on Civil War Era Personalities, Politics, Issues, Campaigns, Battles, and more. Serious Civil War Discussions Only Please! All other posts will be deleted.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-26-2008, 06:15 AM
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,362
Default

Not having much success in making the slaves in the Confederate army soldiers, we are apparently going to try to make the soldiers in the Union army slaves.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-26-2008, 06:27 AM
2nd Lt. (2500+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,671
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Battalion View Post
"...the major-general commanding ...

***This is probably the game that's going on with all these recruiting efforts- the recruiters are pocketing the bounty money.
Still afraid to actually address the question *YOU* put in the topic of the thread? Still wasting time posting quotes designed to mislead others and digress from the point? What is it, exactly, that you are so afraid of? Why are you so insistent on avoiding every straight-forward question you are asked?

Once again: there were roughly 186,000 officers and men in the USCT. Some 179,000 of them are considered to have been Black people. Roughly 6% of all soldiers who served in the US Army in the Civil War were draftees (as opposed to the roughly 100% of the Confederates who were subject to the Conscription law applied to them). Now how many of the USCT do *you* claim were draftees?

Don't avoid this. Don't post some vague quote. Give us a clear and unequivocal statement of what *YOU* mean, in your own words.

Tim
__________________
"Let us, then, consider all attempts to weaken this Union, by maintaining that each state is separately and individually independent, as a species of political heresy, which can never benefit us, but may bring on us the most serious distresses."
Charles Cotesworth Pinckney of South Carolina, 1740-1824, Revolutionary War soldier, one of the authors of the US Constitution in 1787, speaking at the South Carolina Ratifying Convention in 1788.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-26-2008, 08:52 AM
johan_steele's Avatar
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South of the North 40
Posts: 3,677
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matthew mckeon View Post
Not having much success in making the slaves in the Confederate army soldiers, we are apparently going to try to make the soldiers in the Union army slaves.
Sounds about spot on.
__________________
Shane Christen
American Legion Post 352
SUVCW Camp Abernethy# 48
Lifetime NRA member
3rd MN VI

For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow. Eccl 1:18
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-26-2008, 11:45 AM
Cadet
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: south amboy, nj
Posts: 20
Default

you would think there would be more volunteers than draftees
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-26-2008, 12:11 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is offline
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,523
Default

Battalion has in mind some obscure statistic that "proves" most USCT were conscripted. When the discussion bogs down, he will triumphantly produce it, claim righteousness and move on to other excerpt and twisted statistics to "prove" another claim.

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-26-2008, 01:19 PM
Battalion's Avatar
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,713
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ole View Post
Battalion has in mind some obscure statistic that "proves" most USCT were conscripted. When the discussion bogs down, he will triumphantly produce it, claim righteousness and move on to other excerpt and twisted statistics to "prove" another claim.

ole
Moderator Grades:

Ole.....................C-
Johan_Steele........F
__________________
POWER & MONEY

"Your New-York bankers and merchants are shrewd people, but I never gave them credit for so much sagacity as when they took the Government Loan. It was not merely patriotism, it was a high stroke of policy. It has saved the Government, and what they will regard as equally important, saved them from a great financial disaster."

New York Times, 27 September 1861
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-26-2008, 06:46 PM
2nd Lt. (2500+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,671
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Battalion View Post
Moderator Grades:

Ole.....................C-
Johan_Steele........F
ONCE AGAIN:
Still afraid to actually address the question *YOU* put in the topic of the thread? Still wasting time posting quotes designed to mislead others and digress from the point? Or a meaningless digression like this one? What is it, exactly, that you are so afraid of? Why are you so insistent on avoiding every straight-forward question you are asked?

Once again: there were roughly 186,000 officers and men in the USCT. Some 179,000 of them are considered to have been Black people. Roughly 6% of all soldiers who served in the US Army in the Civil War were draftees (as opposed to the roughly 100% of the Confederates who were subject to the Conscription law applied to them). Now how many of the USCT do *you* claim were draftees?

Don't avoid this. Don't post some vague quote. Give us a clear and unequivocal statement of what *YOU* mean, in your own words.

Tim
__________________
"Let us, then, consider all attempts to weaken this Union, by maintaining that each state is separately and individually independent, as a species of political heresy, which can never benefit us, but may bring on us the most serious distresses."
Charles Cotesworth Pinckney of South Carolina, 1740-1824, Revolutionary War soldier, one of the authors of the US Constitution in 1787, speaking at the South Carolina Ratifying Convention in 1788.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-26-2008, 07:57 PM
Freddy's Avatar
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 372
Default

This site says that of those drafted in 1863-1864 accounted for 6% of the troops. This appears to be for white troops.

"Under the Union draft act men faced the possibility of conscription in July 1863 and in Mar., July, and Dec. 1864. Draft riots ensued, notably in New York in 1863. Of the 249,259 18-to-35-year-old men whose names were drawn, only about 6% served, the rest paying commutation or hiring a substitute."

http://www.civilwarhome.com/conscription.htm

In Forged in Battle,The Civil War Alliance of Black Soldiers and White Officers by Joseph Glatthaar he writes this on page 76:

"even within the USCT unsavory methods of recruitment were far too common, as conscription or forced enlistment, was a frequent occurrence."

Still, finding any real numbers for conscripted USCT has not been achieved.
__________________
"Those who forget to remember the past are condemned to repeat it", George Santayana.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-26-2008, 09:24 PM
johan_steele's Avatar
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South of the North 40
Posts: 3,677
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Battalion View Post
Moderator Grades:

Ole.....................C-
Johan_Steele........F
I know you hate the idea that anyone who disagrees w/ you is allowed an opinion; Ole has his as do I and we have the right to give an opinion as do you.
__________________
Shane Christen
American Legion Post 352
SUVCW Camp Abernethy# 48
Lifetime NRA member
3rd MN VI

For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow. Eccl 1:18
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-26-2008, 09:45 PM
Borderruffian's Avatar
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 262
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Battalion View Post
"...the recruiting officers do not even attempt to make any discrimination between the slaves of loyal and those of disloyal men, but go through the country picking up all they can induce to go with them, and in some cases forcing them away..."

Maj.Gen. J.M. Schofield, Department of the Missouri (St. Louis), September 26, 1863
I believe what this refers to is recruitment officers of the Missouri Provisional Home Guard units. The State Union troops formed and marginally under the control of the Provost Marshal.

They formed units of blacks and used them to do manual labor, teamster duties and on occasion to provide security of rail road sites such as trestles.

They (the recruitment officers) also tended to settle old scores with other rivals while using the conscription power.

So these individuals in question most likely were not USCT but State Troops.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Local U.S. Colored Troops: The men, their lives, their deaths scone The Mason-Dixon Gazette 1 05-31-2005 11:33 AM
Colored Troops' contribution in Battle of Nashville rememberedBy scone The Mason-Dixon Gazette 0 01-24-2005 12:30 AM
United States Rifle crowbar Terms beginning with the letter: U 0 09-04-2001 03:05 PM
United States Rifle crowbar Terms beginning with the letter: U 0 09-04-2001 03:02 PM
United States Flintlock crowbar Terms beginning with the letter: U 0 09-04-2001 03:00 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com.
Site Design Version 4.2. - Website powered by Subdreamer CMS
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations