CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - General Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Chat Calendar Mark Forums Read

Civil War History - General Discussion For Discussions on Civil War Era Personalities, Politics, Issues, Campaigns, Battles, and more. Serious Civil War Discussions Only Please! All other posts will be deleted.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-20-2008, 10:45 PM
Cadet
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 2
Default Why the difference in nomenclature?

does anybody know the history (or reason) behind the difference in Northern and Southern terminolgy for certain battles?

ie: north calls it the Battle of Antietam, south calls it Sharpsburg

north calls it First and Second Bull Run, South calls it first and second Manassas.

there are even more instances where the northern army tends to use a creek or water body instead of a nearby town to describe the site of battle. Is there a logical reason for this or is it just coincidence?

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-20-2008, 11:00 PM
unionblue's Avatar
Captain (5000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 5,237
Default

mike.frontier,

It is my understanding that the Union army would name the battles after the nearest body of water, i.e. Antietam Creek, while the Confederate army would name it after the nearest town, i.e. Sharpsburg.

Sincerely,
Unionblue
__________________
"The American people and the Government at Washington may refuse to recognize it for a time but the inexorable logic of events will force it upon them in the end; that the war now being waged in this land is a war for and against slavery." Frederick Douglass

"Loyalty to our ancestors does not include loyalty to their mistakes." George Santayana
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-20-2008, 11:13 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is online now
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,529
Default

It isn't a given, mike. And I don't have the foggiest why the Federals tended to name a battle for a geographical feature; nor why the Confederates chose to name a battle after the nearest town. But you will also note that there is no alternative name for Gettysburg nor Vicksburg. Nor Fredericksburg nor Petersburg nor Appomattox Court House.

Seems like the anomalies also occurred early -- before things got really serious. After that, nobody cared enough to quarrel about the names.

By the way, many welcomes!

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-21-2008, 06:59 PM
Borderruffian's Avatar
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 262
Default

The Union also seems to have liked to refer to their Armies in terms of rivers. Army of the Potomac, Army of the Cumberland, Army of the Tennessee etc
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-21-2008, 07:13 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is online now
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,529
Default

The original question, "why?" still begs an answer.

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-21-2008, 07:49 PM
unionblue's Avatar
Captain (5000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 5,237
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ole View Post
The original question, "why?" still begs an answer.

ole
Because.

Unionblue
__________________
"The American people and the Government at Washington may refuse to recognize it for a time but the inexorable logic of events will force it upon them in the end; that the war now being waged in this land is a war for and against slavery." Frederick Douglass

"Loyalty to our ancestors does not include loyalty to their mistakes." George Santayana
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-21-2008, 10:02 PM
timewalker's Avatar
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Flower Mound, Texas
Posts: 490
Default

I understand, at least for First Manassas/Bull Run, that the Southern papers had already written about an earlier skirmish as the Battle of Bull Run, so they adopted the name of nearby Manassas for the battle even though Bull Run was probably more appropriate.

That may have been the start of it and after that they just got obstinant and whatever the Northerners called it the Southerners would pick another name and vice versa.
__________________
"There must be more historians of the Civil War than there were generals figthing in it... Of the two groups, the historians are the more belligerent." David Donald, Lincoln Reconsidered (1961)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-21-2008, 11:16 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is online now
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,529
Default

But there was a pattern, timewalker. Although I like your observation, the persnicketies who named the battles seem to have had some rules.

Blue: "Because I said so." Finish the sentence.

Is this the place for a discussion of silly walks? Or kniggiits?

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-21-2008, 11:20 PM
gary's Avatar
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,287
Default

Even in the Mexican War the US Army named its battles after the closest city. It traces back to the Revolution. Bennington which was not only a few miles from the two but also across the state line. Saratoga, Lexington, Princeton, Trenton, Yorktown, Charleston, Guildford Court House, Cowpens, Camden, Petersburg (yep, there was fite-n 'round Petersburg during the Revolution and that bad man Tarleton was there) are other examples.

I think the Corn-feds deviated from tradition because they were Con-feds.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-22-2008, 10:10 AM
larry_cockerham's Avatar
1st Lt. (3500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,708
Default

The answer to this is simple. The yanks were lost!
__________________
Ancestors in US Army: 13th TN Cav; 10th TN Cav; 3rd NC Inf
Ancestors in CSA Army: 48th VA; 63rd VA, 5th NC Cav; 37th NC
Wife and Grandson's CSA: 15th AL, 51st GA, 41st TN; 36th TN; GA Mil 1197 Dist
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New River Rangers making a difference for 19 years scone The Mason-Dixon Gazette 0 06-23-2005 08:14 AM
What's the difference between... gary Book & Movie Review Tent 3 09-13-2003 04:08 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com.
Site Design Version 4.2. - Website powered by Subdreamer CMS
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations