CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - General Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Chat Calendar Mark Forums Read

Civil War History - General Discussion For Discussions on Civil War Era Personalities, Politics, Issues, Campaigns, Battles, and more. Serious Civil War Discussions Only Please! All other posts will be deleted.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-13-2008, 02:01 PM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 947
Default Size of armies.

Been doing a bit of reading on numbers served/deserted/on hand etc, ( never seen a flow chart showing relative force level numbers and wonderd why)whats everyones thoughts on the mil population in 1860, and size of relative force levels this allowed the two sides to field, and how big a disadvantage, in numerical terms was the south at any given point in time, for instance 1,000,512 in May 65 on the Union roll, when CSA surrenders 445k on the role, but hardly a fraction of that paroled.

Ive got some thoughts/numbers, but has anyone wonderd about this?.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.

Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote."
Benjamin Franklin, 1759
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-13-2008, 02:40 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is offline
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,523
Default

Whoa, Hanny! That's a tall order -- almost a week-to-week proposition.

By end of 1860, the US army was less than 16,000 officers and men, and they were scattered from here to Sunday. Any military type organizations were in militia companies of states and social clubs in cities.

When the CSA Congress was seated, it authorized President Davis to call up to 100,000 state militias to serve in the confederacy. Timelines become snarled and tangled after that.

Welcome back.

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-14-2008, 01:19 AM
unionblue's Avatar
Captain (5000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 5,232
Default

Hanny,

Welcome back. It has been a long time since I have seen a post by you.

Pertaining to your question, I would like very much to see your figures and such on the question you pose.

Sincerely,
Unionblue
__________________
"The American people and the Government at Washington may refuse to recognize it for a time but the inexorable logic of events will force it upon them in the end; that the war now being waged in this land is a war for and against slavery." Frederick Douglass

"Loyalty to our ancestors does not include loyalty to their mistakes." George Santayana
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-14-2008, 05:21 AM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 947
Default

Hi folks, yes long time no post, hope you all are well.

Rehabs finished, nice scar from armpit to wrist on left arm, a plate some wires and panel pins, and im good to go, hopefully the typing will be better now, ie less errors and less iritation for me as i type.

Im still collecting data, but as ole says the regular army in 61 is the base line to start from, using that as a base line for desertion/awol, and E Lonns desertion in the war, it will help to put the most difficult part of the maths in context.ie the presnet for duty number is a known, its easy to add up the KIA/WIA,death by other causes numbers from the OR, but the awol/absent numbers is very vauge at present, was the fedewral Army only 620k strong in 65?, were 320 awol?, Lets see what foots gives us, page 739 vol 3, after giving us Grants close out plan, "despite heavy losses in the past nine months, over 100,000 in eastern Va alone and about that number elswhere---his total combat force was about 600,000 effectives, exclusive of reserves amounting to half as many more, while his oponent had dwindldiled to 160k of all arms".

heres one online source, http://www.civilwarhome.com/armysize.htm it looks like the OR numbers, and is easier to see at aglantz than say, Livermore numbers and losses, which is also online and does the same thing.

What i want to understand better is how Foots used the same numbers and thinks there are 900k effectives, when Long thinks its 600k.

Im looking at amazon list of admistartive historys of the AoP at present to see what i can glean.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.

Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote."
Benjamin Franklin, 1759

Last edited by Hanny : 02-14-2008 at 06:53 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-14-2008, 07:45 AM
unionblue's Avatar
Captain (5000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 5,232
Default

Hanny,

I'm sorry, but were you involved in some sort of auto accident?

I do hope you are pretty much over it, if that is the case, but rehab?

That must have been some accident!

Glad to have you back and look forward to debating and talking with you once again.

Please, take it easy and give yourself time to come fully back. My wife just went through an auto accident but it doesn't sound nearly as severe as what you have been through.

Sincerely,
Unionblue
__________________
"The American people and the Government at Washington may refuse to recognize it for a time but the inexorable logic of events will force it upon them in the end; that the war now being waged in this land is a war for and against slavery." Frederick Douglass

"Loyalty to our ancestors does not include loyalty to their mistakes." George Santayana
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-14-2008, 02:39 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is offline
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,523
Default

Foote's numbers are not likely based on his own research; i.e., he got them from someone else who, one would hope, did some thorough research.

Sounds like you've bitten off quite a chaw in looking for numbers. Good luck.

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-14-2008, 05:34 PM
johan_steele's Avatar
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South of the North 40
Posts: 3,674
Default

A start might be.

Newton, Steven H. Lost for the Cause the Confederate Army of 1864, Savas Publishing Company, 2000.

Phisterer, Frederick, Campaigns of the Civil War Supplementary Volume Statistical Record of the Armies of the United States, Castle Books, 2002.

Todd, Frederick P., American Military Equipage 1850-1872 vol 2, Company of Military Historians, 1977.

Todd, Frederick P., American Military Equipage 1850-1872 vol 3, Company of Military Historians, 1977.
__________________
Shane Christen
American Legion Post 352
SUVCW Camp Abernethy# 48
Lifetime NRA member
3rd MN VI

For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow. Eccl 1:18
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-16-2008, 05:06 AM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 947
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ole View Post
Foote's numbers are not likely based on his own research; i.e., he got them from someone else who, one would hope, did some thorough research.

Sounds like you've bitten off quite a chaw in looking for numbers. Good luck.

ole
The numbers in Foot/Mcpherson et all are are dirivates from the OR, depending if its a tri monthly filed return or whatever, the numbers they all agree on, since they all use then same source to obtain them, but then go onto use them slightly differtly in how those numbers were used.

Since Foote won many awards for his research i dont follow you coment.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.

Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote."
Benjamin Franklin, 1759
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-16-2008, 05:07 AM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 947
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by johan_steele View Post
A start might be.

Newton, Steven H. Lost for the Cause the Confederate Army of 1864, Savas Publishing Company, 2000.

Phisterer, Frederick, Campaigns of the Civil War Supplementary Volume Statistical Record of the Armies of the United States, Castle Books, 2002.

Todd, Frederick P., American Military Equipage 1850-1872 vol 2, Company of Military Historians, 1977.

Todd, Frederick P., American Military Equipage 1850-1872 vol 3, Company of Military Historians, 1977.
Ta, Philster and Livermore i already have acess to, the others are new to me.
__________________
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.

Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote."
Benjamin Franklin, 1759
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-17-2008, 08:53 AM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 35
Default

Interesting question, wonder how it came about?

The consolidated return dated 31 Dec 64 states:

Officers Present for Duty: 20,124
Enlisted Men PfD: 475,775
Present, not fit for duty: 109,461
Absent: 331,631

Absent is generally those sent home on furlough "sick", which was essentially French Leave. At this point the absent figure is inflated by the Veteran Corps, who on reenlistment were sent home on furlough from which the vast majority never returned. This new 1st (Veteran) Corps (under Hancock) in this return only has 168 present, and would never become efficient.

Out and out deserters, of which there were maybe 200,000 in this period are included in the "Present for Duty" in the return, which I've always found odd, but has been US practice back to 1776 (when Washington thought the Desertion rate in his army too depressing for publication, and so ordered that Deserters be counted as Present).

There were thus maybe 300,000 men in the field. The sum of all the combatant formations at this point is about 250,000, the difference being largely returns from the Pacific, New Mexico, Northern etc. depts not actually engaged in the war.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What size? gary Campfire Chat - General Discussions 33 06-22-2007 06:26 PM
Rare maps spotlight armies maneuvers scone The Mason-Dixon Gazette 6 04-01-2006 09:43 PM
Civil War Dream Team Armies IrishBrigadeLadd Civil War History - General Discussion 28 01-11-2006 12:41 PM
Desertions v. AWOL in the Confederate Armies in 1862 gary Campfire Chat - General Discussions 3 04-17-2005 10:53 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com.
Site Design Version 4.2. - Website powered by Subdreamer CMS
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations