CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - General Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Chat Calendar Mark Forums Read

Civil War History - General Discussion For Discussions on Civil War Era Personalities, Politics, Issues, Campaigns, Battles, and more. Serious Civil War Discussions Only Please! All other posts will be deleted.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 12-19-2007, 07:41 PM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 33
Default

I guess I just dont see how the North could control every mile of the river and not let some supplies get snuck across. But maybe they patroled the river more than I'm aware of.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 12-19-2007, 07:56 PM
5fish's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 760
Default Mississippi

Quote:
Originally Posted by tackitt27
Just a couple questions on Vicksburg if I may. I for one dont think saving Vicksburg would have saved the war for the South, and there is no way to get a significant amount of troops to do so very quickly. My questions are this: Was there actually a idea to send Longstreet to Mississippi, and who's idea was it? Also to what significance was the defeat at Vicksburg? I know there were plenty of cannon on the hills surrounding there to keep Northern ships getting to New Orleans. What was the North needing to ship from say St. Louis to New Orleans that was so important?
My impression is the south thought by controlling the Mississippi river, it could keep northern grain from the Midwest off the international markets. Before the war the Midwest grain was shipped down the Mississippi river and then shipped out of New Orleans.

During the war the Midwest farmers were able the use the northern train system to get their grain to the eastern ports and onto the international markets.

The north wanted the Mississippi for they were just slowly putting their stranglehold on the south.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 12-19-2007, 10:29 PM
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,395
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5fish


Read about those months leading up to that faithful days at Gettysburg and you will see Lee was completely frustrated with Pres. Davis and his mismanagement of the war.
Please post what you believe is Lee "completely frustrated with" Davis.

Regards,
Cash
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 12-19-2007, 10:35 PM
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,395
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whitworth
Well Lee didn't speak very highly of the Confederate deserters, late in the war, and those giving them aid and comfort at home.
Nor did he speak highly of confederate congressmen.

"Well Mr. Custis, I have been up to see the Congress, and they do not seem to be able to do anything except to eat peanuts and chew tobacco while my army is starving." [R. E. Lee to G. W. Custis Lee, March 1865]

There seem to be quite a few folks he said a discouraging word about.

Regards,
Cash
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 12-20-2007, 01:27 AM
larry_cockerham's Avatar
1st Lt. (3500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,708
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cash
Nor did he speak highly of confederate congressmen.

"Well Mr. Custis, I have been up to see the Congress, and they do not seem to be able to do anything except to eat peanuts and chew tobacco while my army is starving." [R. E. Lee to G. W. Custis Lee, March 1865]

There seem to be quite a few folks he said a discouraging word about.

Regards,
Cash
Lee was apparently a good judge of character.
__________________
Ancestors in US Army: 13th TN Cav; 10th TN Cav; 3rd NC Inf
Ancestors in CSA Army: 48th VA; 63rd VA, 5th NC Cav; 37th NC
Wife and Grandson's CSA: 15th AL, 51st GA, 41st TN; 36th TN; GA Mil 1197 Dist
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 12-20-2007, 08:14 PM
Freddy's Avatar
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 372
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tackitt27
I guess I just dont see how the North could control every mile of the river and not let some supplies get snuck across. But maybe they patroled the river more than I'm aware of.
It was called "The Thousand Mile Front" and it was defended with a series of Union forts and from Wikipedia:
"After the fall of Vicksburg in July 1863, it became impossible for units to cross the Mississippi since Union gunboats constantly patrolled it. The South thus lost use of its western regions."
__________________
"Those who forget to remember the past are condemned to repeat it", George Santayana.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 12-20-2007, 10:29 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is online now
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,523
Default

Prewar Vicksburg figured significantly in river commerce. It served central Mississippi as a supply line. From west of the river, it served northern Louisana and some commerce from Arkansas and Texas but, it was not as important a river port as Memphis and St. Louis.

Without St. Louis and Memphis, Vicksburg couldn't handle the volume needed by the confederacy. Although taking it hurt, it served more as a psychological symbol than a tactical necessity.

Most certainly some supplies leaked across the river. The south no longer had steamers, so what made it was rowed across at night. How much could that be?

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 12-20-2007, 10:54 PM
samgrant's Avatar
Brig. General, Trivia Mod
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Land of Lincoln (and Grant)
Posts: 3,792
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cash
"Well Mr. Custis, I have been up to see the Congress, and they do not seem to be able to do anything except to eat peanuts and chew tobacco while my army is starving." [R. E. Lee to G. W. Custis Lee, March 1865]
I love that quote. It is so real.

-
__________________
-

"It was a very peculiar time." - Franklin D. Cossitt

Ancestors in USA Army: 6th IA Inf, 11th IL Cav, 1st AL Cav; 122nd NY Inf; 6th MI Cav; 35th MA Inf; 100th IL Inf; 1st CO Inf/Cav; 22nd IN Inf

Ancestors in CSA Army: 2nd TN Inf (Walker's), 9th TN Cav (Bennett's/Ward's); 2nd TX Inf
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com.
Site Design Version 4.2. - Website powered by Subdreamer CMS
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations