CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - General Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Chat Calendar Mark Forums Read

Civil War History - General Discussion For Discussions on Civil War Era Personalities, Politics, Issues, Campaigns, Battles, and more. Serious Civil War Discussions Only Please! All other posts will be deleted.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 12-09-2007, 11:12 AM
gary's Avatar
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,283
Default

Let's assume Davis died suddenly, say of a heart attack. The new president is not a graduate of West Point and defers to Lee for his strategy. Lee is myopic and sees only the situation in Virginia. Gettysburg still happens then.

It's only if Lee is able to grasp the bigger picture, that he might have to sacrifice parts of Virginia to save the Confederacy, and dispatch units to upset the balance temporarily, perhaps even to save Vicksburg, can he prolong the war into late '64 and perhaps give the copperhead democrats enough momentum to put McClellan into office. Recognition would follow.

The idea of blockade runners dropping off supplies to non port areas entails a chain of smaller ships ferrying the goods from the blockade runner to land. Slow and inefficient, it would require evading Union picket boats and require the merchant being there (requiring some coordination) with sufficient wagons (because there's no port, there's no railroad) to take the goods. Blockade runners don't smuggle for free and the merchant or his agent will have to be there to pay him. By nature of having numerous small boats and plenty of wagons, this means a lot of people will know and sympathizers will leak the information to the Union.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-10-2007, 06:53 AM
5fish's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 756
Default CASH- Be Real

Quote:
Originally Posted by cash
No.

Regards,
Cash

Be real!

If Pres. Davis government had been overthrown in a coup, I bet Lee would have follow the new leaders. He was obedient to authority not so much to Democratic values. His only goal was to win the war not setting up a Democratic from of government.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-10-2007, 12:57 PM
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,488
Default LEE'S - Last Chance to Save A Nation.

5fish, read up on the Boer War. IMO the events after the regular Boer armed forces had been neutralized would have been a microcosim of the events in the south after its regular armed forces are broken up.
In SA the British and Boers more or less agreed not to use native troops, keeping it a 'white mand's' war. In any case, the native peoples in SA had no real interest either sides war aims. The same could not be said for the millions of slaves and ex-slaves in and out of the Union armies.
IMO opinion such a war would have been a fight to the death with no quarter asked or given... And the bigger battalions would still win.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-11-2007, 05:18 PM
5fish's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 756
Default Change the war!

Quote:
Originally Posted by OpnDownfall
5fish, read up on the Boer War. IMO the events after the regular Boer armed forces had been neutralized would have been a microcosim of the events in the south after its regular armed forces are broken up.
In SA the British and Boers more or less agreed not to use native troops, keeping it a 'white mand's' war. In any case, the native peoples in SA had no real interest either sides war aims. The same could not be said for the millions of slaves and ex-slaves in and out of the Union armies.
IMO opinion such a war would have been a fight to the death with no quarter asked or given... And the bigger battalions would still win.

In 1863 the resolve of the North and South to continued the was still strong. If the south had turn it into a gorilla war then it may cause the war to last past 1965.

If the war did not look winnable in 1864 maybe McClellan would have won the election and I doubt he would have wanted to pursue war further.

In 1863. the south was unable to supple and maintain a modern army of that day. I think dissolving the war into a gorilla style war is a viable solution. By 1865, the south's resolve was gone and pursuing a gorilla war then would not have work and Lee knew this as well.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-11-2007, 06:21 PM
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,488
Default LEE'S - Last Chance to Save A Nation.

Well, anything is 'possible' but Lee, himself surrendered rather than have the war degenerate to such a state. It is quite unlikely that Lee would have had any interest in such a scheme.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12-11-2007, 07:33 PM
samgrant's Avatar
Brig. General, Trivia Mod
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Land of Lincoln (and Grant)
Posts: 3,792
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5fish
In 1863 the resolve of the North and South to continued the was still strong. If the south had turn it into a gorilla war then it may cause the war to last past 1965.

If the war did not look winnable in 1864 maybe McClellan would have won the election and I doubt he would have wanted to pursue war further.

In 1863. the south was unable to supple and maintain a modern army of that day. I think dissolving the war into a gorilla style war is a viable solution. By 1865, the south's resolve was gone and pursuing a gorilla war then would not have work and Lee knew this as well.
I guess that would be the "Planet of the Apes" scenario.
__________________
-

"It was a very peculiar time." - Franklin D. Cossitt

Ancestors in USA Army: 6th IA Inf, 11th IL Cav, 1st AL Cav; 122nd NY Inf; 6th MI Cav; 35th MA Inf; 100th IL Inf; 1st CO Inf/Cav; 22nd IN Inf

Ancestors in CSA Army: 2nd TN Inf (Walker's), 9th TN Cav (Bennett's/Ward's); 2nd TX Inf
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12-11-2007, 10:53 PM
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,395
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5fish
Be real!
I'm one of the few being real.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5fish
If Pres. Davis government had been overthrown in a coup, I bet Lee would have follow the new leaders. He was obedient to authority not so much to Democratic values. His only goal was to win the war not setting up a Democratic from of government.
I suggest reading some biographies of Lee by historians. Lee was not the kind of person who would approve of a coup, which afterall is an illegal, unconstitutional act, and he would probably have marched the ANV into Richmond and restored Davis to power.

Regards,
Cash
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12-12-2007, 02:00 AM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is offline
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,523
Default

Quote:
Lee was not the kind of person who would approve of a coup, which afterall is an illegal, unconstitutional act, and he would probably have marched the ANV into Richmond and restored Davis to power.
A very large Amen! Lee gave his allegiance but once. It didn't shift or move about. Just one of the admirable things about Marse Lee.

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12-12-2007, 08:29 AM
5fish's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 756
Default Ole!

Quote:
Originally Posted by ole
A very large Amen! Lee gave his allegiance but once. It didn't shift or move about. Just one of the admirable things about Marse Lee.

ole
Ole! think back in time.

Old Marse Lee gave his allegiance once to our constitution and renegged on it later as it suited him.

Old Marse Lee had an opportunist within him.

He never talk about Democrate values only about obedience to authority.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-12-2007, 08:43 AM
5fish's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 756
Default Cash!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by cash
I'm one of the few being real.



I suggest reading some biographies of Lee by historians. Lee was not the kind of person who would approve of a coup, which afterall is an illegal, unconstitutional act, and he would probably have marched the ANV into Richmond and restored Davis to power.

Regards,
Cash
Cashie!

Lee was fed up with Pres. Davis's handling of the war and tried to encourage him to chance his war policies. He was from an authoritarian back ground both in life and in the army. If someone with his social class had led a successful coup he would not have objected to it.

He knew the war effort would be better helped with Pres. Davis out of the way. He would have submitted to the will of the coup leaders if it would have aided in his war efforts.

Lee was gentleman but an elitist and elitist never are great believer's in Democratic values if it does not support their status in society

He would have not march the army to Richmond.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com.
Site Design Version 4.2. - Website powered by Subdreamer CMS
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations