CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - General Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Chat Calendar Mark Forums Read

Civil War History - General Discussion For Discussions on Civil War Era Personalities, Politics, Issues, Campaigns, Battles, and more. Serious Civil War Discussions Only Please! All other posts will be deleted.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12-10-2007, 07:10 PM
Freddy's Avatar
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 372
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gary
There is the regular army, or Regulars, and the volunteer army, Volunteers. One may be commissioned in both forces but hold different ranks. The distinction was that for a volunteer officer, while he received the pay and rank (title), he was not expected to continue in that rank in the post-war era. A good example is Volunteer Maj. Gen. George Custer who was only a Lt-Col. in the Regulars. Once the war was over, Custer reverted to the regular rank and pay (even though he could be addressed by his volunteer title).
Custer was a Brevet Major General of both the Regular and Volunteer Army out of West Point who just happened to lead volunteers as did every general officer. Brevet is a temporary rank and Custer's reverted to Captain after going to Texas during reconstruction and being named Commander of Cavalry as he remained an officer of the Regular US Army.
__________________
"Those who forget to remember the past are condemned to repeat it", George Santayana.

Last edited by Freddy : 12-10-2007 at 07:36 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-10-2007, 11:12 PM
samgrant's Avatar
Brig. General, Trivia Mod
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Land of Lincoln (and Grant)
Posts: 3,792
Default

During the war, an officer could hold as many as four differnet ranks at the same time.


"During the American Civil War regular United States Army officers sometimes had up to four different ranks.
First they had their "permanent" rank in the regular army. In addition, however, they could also hold either
(or both) a rank in the volunteers or brevet rank (regular army and / or volunteers). Thus a single officer could
hold a permanent rank of major in the United States army, and at the same time hold the rank of colonel of
volunteers, a brevet rank of colonel in the army, and a brevet rank of brigadier general in the volunteers."

http://www.4thuscok.org/notes/ranks.html

-
__________________
-

"It was a very peculiar time." - Franklin D. Cossitt

Ancestors in USA Army: 6th IA Inf, 11th IL Cav, 1st AL Cav; 122nd NY Inf; 6th MI Cav; 35th MA Inf; 100th IL Inf; 1st CO Inf/Cav; 22nd IN Inf

Ancestors in CSA Army: 2nd TN Inf (Walker's), 9th TN Cav (Bennett's/Ward's); 2nd TX Inf
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-27-2007, 02:52 PM
Cadet
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 22
Default If highest "ranking'....

Since the question posed was highest ranking officer, I'd have to go with Sedgwick. Highest position would be McPherson, but position and rank are too different things (ask several commanders of the Army of the Potomac).

Who outranks who was (and still is) determined by rank, then date of rank, then in the case of a tie by time in service. Sedgwick had more time in grade than McPherson.

During the Civil War, there was an additional distinction, regular army vs volunteer. A regular army commission was considered senior to a volunteer one, and the distinction superseded date of rank. The reason for the difference was that volunteer ranks were only around until the end of volunteer service (end of the war), while regular army ranks were permanent. There had to be a difference, as the number of permanent ranks was something controlled by Congress at one rank per position. For example, if there were 27 (random number) regiments in the Army when the Civil War broke out, there were only 27 colonels authorized for service. If a colonel were needed elsewhere, say to command the Department of California, that position came out of the Army's hide. The colonel would go lead the department, and the lieutenant colonel would lead the regiment in his absence. For years in many cases.

Which has led us a bit off topic. Sorry.
__________________
Don

http://crossedsabers.blogspot.com/
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com.
Site Design Version 4.2. - Website powered by Subdreamer CMS
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations