CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - General Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Chat Calendar Mark Forums Read

Civil War History - General Discussion For Discussions on Civil War Era Personalities, Politics, Issues, Campaigns, Battles, and more. Serious Civil War Discussions Only Please! All other posts will be deleted.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-21-2007, 11:20 AM
FSPowers's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 546
Default Marines

There has not been much information on the role of the Marines in the Civil War. Their traditional role, ship security, small scale land missions, and fighting at sea, was not called for in the major land battles of the war. Still, Marines played a part in the eventual Union victory.

Union:

In 1861 the US Marine Corps consisted of the Commandant, usually a Colonel, a Major who had the dual jobs of Adjutant and Inspector, another Major who was the Paymaster, a Quartermaster, another Major, and an Assistant Quartermaster, a Captain, making up the Command Section.
Operations consisted of a Lieutenant Colonel, four Majors, 13 Captains, 20 First Lieutenants, 20 Second Lieutenants, 101 Sergeants, 137 corporals, and 1347 Privates.
This was soon raised to include one additional Colonel, one additional Lieutenant Colonel, one additional Assistant Quartermaster, seven more Captains, 10 more First Lieutenants, and 10 more Second Lieutenants. A total Enlisted strength of 220 more corporals, and 2500 privates was also authorized.

The US Marine Corps was the size of almost three standard Civil War regiments.

The US Marines had already played a role in pre-Civil War tensions; it was a detachment of Marines, led by US Army Colonel Robert E. Lee, who put down John Brown’s Revolt in 1859.

The raise in Marines was done after a detachment of 13 Officers and 336 Enlisted were among those running from the battlefield at First Bull run (Manassas, VA). Some of these additions were also for replacing officers who resigned their commissions and joined a newly created Confederate States Marine Corps.

Two noted missions that the Marines were a part of was an assault on Fort Sumter, Charleston, SC on 8 September, 1863, which failed, an engagement at Honey Hill, SC in 1864, and the assault on Fort Fisher, 15 January 1865 as part of a sailor/Marine force.

Marine uniforms were a little bit different then the Army’s. The headgear was the traditional kepi with a badge consisting of an “M” set in a red oval. The blouse was the same as the Army’s and was colored the same shade of blue. The trousers were white instead of sky blue. Enlisted rank was noted as upward pointing red chevrons while the officer rank was marked by the use of Russian Knots instead of the rank badges the Army used.

Confederate:

The CS Marine Corps was initially made up of six companies officered by former US Marine officers. The Corps was soon commanded by a Colonel, with a Lieutenant Colonel, three Majors (adjutant, paymaster, and quartermaster), a Sergeant Major, a Quartermaster Sergeant, and two Musicians in the Command Section.
Operation were conducted at the company level with 10 Captains, 10 First Lieutenants, 20 Second Lieutenants, 40 Sergeants, 40 Corporals, and 840 Privates.

The companies were assigned thus:

Company A: formed at New Orleans in 1861 and was assigned to Richmond in 1862.

Company B: formed at New Orleans in 1861 and was assigned to Richmond in 1862.

Company C: formed at New Orleans in 1861 and was assigned to Richmond in 1862.

Company D: formed at Memphis and Mobile, assigned to Mobile.

Company E: formed at Savannah, assigned to Charleston in 1864 and sent a detachment to Wilmington.

Company F: formed at New Orleans, moved to Mobile after New Orleans fell.

Parts of these companies were detached to ship duty aboard the following: CSS Atlanta, Baltic, Charleston, Chicora, Columbia, Dalman, Drewry, Fredericksburg, Gaines, Gallego, Huntress, Indian Chief, Isondiaga, Jamestown, Macon, McRae, Morgan, Nashville, North Carolina, Palmetto State, Patrick Henry, Raleigh, Resolute, Richmond, Sampson, Savannah (both the steamer and the ironclad vessels), Tennessee, Time, United States, Virginia, Virginia II, Tallahassee/Olustree, Shenandoah, Georgia, Rappahannock, Stonewall, Artic, and Georgia.

The first CS Marines fought during the attack of CSS Virginia on the Federal blockade on 8-9 March, 1862. Their last engagement was at Saylor’s Creek on 6 April, 1865.

CS Marine uniforms almost copied the US Marine model, except that the overblouse was gray and the enlisted chevrons were brown. It is not known if the kepis had any ornamentation, as records were destroyed in 1865. The same white trousers were used.

Weapons for either side would be the standard rifled muskets and sidearms, but specially treated to prevent corrosion while at sea.
__________________
F. S. Powers

Union Ancersor: Pvt Arnuah Norton, 60th Ohio. (G-G-G Grandfather) Died at Salisbury NC, November 3, 1864

Confederate Ancestors: Captain Thomas A. Morrow, 29th Texas Cavalry (G-G-G- Uncle) and 2LT George W. Morrow, 31st Texas Cavalry (G-G-G Grandfather). Both survived the war

My blog: http://fspowerscw.blogspot.com

My Book; http://stores.lulu.com/store.php?fAcctID=1900736

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-21-2007, 02:15 PM
5fish's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 756
Default Question?

At the battle of Sailor Creek there were navel units mixed with the confederate army. Where they CS marine units?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-21-2007, 02:28 PM
FSPowers's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 546
Default

It is possible that some of the remanants of the CS Marine Corps were with the ANV at the end.

I believe that the last active CS Marine unit was the detachment on board CSS Shenandoah. They would have joined Waddell in surrendering to British authirities at Liverpool.
__________________
F. S. Powers

Union Ancersor: Pvt Arnuah Norton, 60th Ohio. (G-G-G Grandfather) Died at Salisbury NC, November 3, 1864

Confederate Ancestors: Captain Thomas A. Morrow, 29th Texas Cavalry (G-G-G- Uncle) and 2LT George W. Morrow, 31st Texas Cavalry (G-G-G Grandfather). Both survived the war

My blog: http://fspowerscw.blogspot.com

My Book; http://stores.lulu.com/store.php?fAcctID=1900736

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-30-2007, 11:35 PM
Borderruffian's Avatar
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 260
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5fish
At the battle of Sailor Creek there were navel units mixed with the confederate army. Where they CS marine units?
It's my understanding that the remaining CSMC units were attached to the ad-hoc CSN "Brigade".

After the sinking of Virginia members of her MARDET manned the guns at Drewery's Bluff in 62.

The USMC Kepi Badge was eithier a "wheel" with an M in the center or the infantry hunting horn with a gilt M set in red inside the horn. depending on when the Marine enlisted and the availabilty of the new horn isignias.

The issue trousers of USMC unit's varied and although White Duck was issued Marines also received Sky-blue kersey and dark blue trousers were issued.

Last edited by Borderruffian : 10-30-2007 at 11:58 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-07-2007, 09:37 AM
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 919
Default Marines

The marines of the Civil War were as marines are in most of the navies of the world, small units aboard ship and shore installations.
As I recall some U.S. Marine units did see action at first Bull Run. There is a book I read on the Confederate Marines. We're basically talking obscure actions. At Fort Fisher, N.C. the marines shared the infantry duty with the navy bluejackets.
The U.S. Marines became the "U.S. Marines" by accident. Due to the small U.S. Army at the start of WWI, the Marines had the small training cadre that could increase the infantry "soldier" in France. Once that door got opened, it was never successfully shut.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-07-2007, 05:43 PM
Borderruffian's Avatar
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 260
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by whitworth
The U.S. Marines became the "U.S. Marines" by accident. Due to the small U.S. Army at the start of WWI, the Marines had the small training cadre that could increase the infantry "soldier" in France. Once that door got opened, it was never successfully shut.
The United States Marine Corps has always been the United States Marine Corps, since it's inception. The USMC had Advanced Base Forces (ABF) to WWI. These were Regimental Size and the forerunner of today's MEU's. These ABF's were used in Vera Cruz and Haiti prior to WWI.

The reason that the Marines of the 5th and 6th Regiments were attached to Army Divisions during WWI was due to an agreement with Pershing who wished to exclude the Marines from service in France.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-07-2007, 06:02 PM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tijuana, Baja California
Posts: 170
Default

Don't really believe the attitude of the Senior Folks on either side was conductive to using Marines. they were generally thought of as ships detachements or Naval Yard Guards. If I am not mistaken they made a couple of landings before the Civil War. Will have to look up when and where. The Marines have historicaly been looked upon as children born outside of wedlock. I can say I have only done two really smart things in my life. Married my wife and stayed in the Marines for 22 years. Rest has been dumb luck.

Pinckney
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-07-2007, 06:10 PM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Tijuana, Baja California
Posts: 170
Default

Might add that those who fought in the Mexican War should have known the Marines Capabilities. They did quite well at Chapultepec. I've been there, glad I didn't have to assault the place.

Pinckney
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-07-2007, 06:54 PM
Borderruffian's Avatar
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 260
Default

The Corps made several landings in California during the Mexican War. They were also landed during the Mexican War in the Vera Cruz landing.

During the Civil War the Corps numbered roughly 4000 enlisted and officer. Most assigned to Ships Detachments and Navy yards. The decision was made at HQMC not to consolidate into larger formations as it was feared that might lead to the Corps being folded into the Army.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-07-2007, 07:13 PM
gary's Avatar
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,283
Default

Current Marine amphibious landing doctrine wasn't adapted until the 1930s. However, there are precedents already mentioned where the Marines went ashore and fought as infantry. "From the Halls of Montezuma to the shores of Tripoli..."

While that doctrine is still accepted, the Marine doctrine is constantly evolving due to the changes in their role. Presently they're infantry fighting on the forefront (but let's not get into political discussions).
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com.
Site Design Version 4.2. - Website powered by Subdreamer CMS
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations