CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - General Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Chat Calendar Mark Forums Read

Civil War History - General Discussion For Discussions on Civil War Era Personalities, Politics, Issues, Campaigns, Battles, and more. Serious Civil War Discussions Only Please! All other posts will be deleted.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-15-2007, 01:06 AM
larry_cockerham's Avatar
1st Lt. (3500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,706
Default

Lee was a lot closer the surface of the water than most of his contemporaries. One would have expected that. He was a very well educated man of the upper crust of society, both political and civil. Alas, as you've just alluded, he wasn't completely a saint either. The term human comes to mind. Lee's attitude toward blacks, while marginally unbiased at best, was repeated hundreds of thousands of times by his countrymen, both south and north. Racism was the norm in 1865. It only slowly improves.
__________________
Ancestors in US Army: 13th TN Cav; 10th TN Cav; 3rd NC Inf
Ancestors in CSA Army: 48th VA; 63rd VA, 5th NC Cav; 37th NC
Wife and Grandson's CSA: 15th AL, 51st GA, 41st TN; 36th TN; GA Mil 1197 Dist
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-15-2007, 11:49 AM
samgrant's Avatar
Brig. General, Trivia Mod
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Land of Lincoln (and Grant)
Posts: 3,792
Default

Here's one man's (Thomas B. Buell in The Warrior Generals) nutshell view:

"He was committed to preserving the status quo, his vision was locked firmly in the past, and he sacrificed his army to protect the priviledges of the oligarchy to which he belonged. Lee's fundamental strategy was fighting for the sake of fighting, surrender was never an option if the war could still be prolonged, and in the end he destroyed his state trying to save it."
__________________
-

"It was a very peculiar time." - Franklin D. Cossitt

Ancestors in USA Army: 6th IA Inf, 11th IL Cav, 1st AL Cav; 122nd NY Inf; 6th MI Cav; 35th MA Inf; 100th IL Inf; 1st CO Inf/Cav; 22nd IN Inf

Ancestors in CSA Army: 2nd TN Inf (Walker's), 9th TN Cav (Bennett's/Ward's); 2nd TX Inf
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-15-2007, 12:38 PM
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 366
Default

Everybody wants a hero, somebody to adore and to, for lack of a better word, worship. But its true. Many out there practically worship General Lee. He was a good general, to be sure, and a superb tactician. But like any other human, he had his failings. And it is unfortunate that he has become such an idol, because I don't think Lee would want to be remembered that way. But what all historians should remember, and this is something I was taught at university, you have to remember that they were human too, and they made made mistakes just like we do today. They weren't perfect, no matter how hard we want them to be.
__________________
"The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize." George Washington, Farewell Address, 1796

http://tothegloryoftheunion.blogspot.com/
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-15-2007, 03:03 PM
cw1865's Avatar
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,000
Default Legends

Quote:
Originally Posted by J_Man0507
Everybody wants a hero, somebody to adore and to, for lack of a better word, worship. But its true. Many out there practically worship General Lee. He was a good general, to be sure, and a superb tactician. But like any other human, he had his failings. And it is unfortunate that he has become such an idol, because I don't think Lee would want to be remembered that way. But what all historians should remember, and this is something I was taught at university, you have to remember that they were human too, and they made made mistakes just like we do today. They weren't perfect, no matter how hard we want them to be.
When the legend becomes fact, print the legend!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-15-2007, 05:59 PM
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 366
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cw1865
When the legend becomes fact, print the legend!
You hit the nail on the head CW. The nail on the head.
__________________
"The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize." George Washington, Farewell Address, 1796

http://tothegloryoftheunion.blogspot.com/
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-15-2007, 09:11 PM
5fish's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 756
Default No!

Quote:
Originally Posted by cw1865
When the legend becomes fact, print the legend!

No! a little honesty in the legend would be nice. I do not want to belittle Gen. Lee or even take away his saintliness but the romantic legend that embraces him clouds history and leaves questions of why during some events of the civil war.

We will always love legend..
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-15-2007, 09:13 PM
5fish's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 756
Default Much truth

Quote:
Originally Posted by samgrant
Here's one man's (Thomas B. Buell in The Warrior Generals) nutshell view:

"He was committed to preserving the status quo, his vision was locked firmly in the past, and he sacrificed his army to protect the priviledges of the oligarchy to which he belonged. Lee's fundamental strategy was fighting for the sake of fighting, surrender was never an option if the war could still be prolonged, and in the end he destroyed his state trying to save it."
Much truth in these words.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-15-2007, 09:54 PM
5fish's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 756
Default Simple put...

I have questions about the phrase "if practical". I believe the whole idea of Gen. Lee try to promote initiative in his subordinates may be part of his romantic legend.

Look at his first two corp commanders Gen. Jackson and Gen. Longstreet. As far as I can tell they did not issue discretionary orders to their subordinates. They gave orders with little or no wiggle room in them. They did not create environments for initiative.

The legend clouds the truth.

One historian claims the phrase "if practical" was Gen. Lee being polite. Think about it?

I would bet no one has ever study the history behind the phrase "if practical" or the original military purpose for the phrase, or when the phrase should be used in an order, or the military meaning behind those two words in the 19th century.

I read another order with the phrase "if practical" in it and it implied that after the objectives were met then do this if practical. The general in this order was not Gen. Lee.

Simple put Gen. Lee's direct subordinates did not promote initiative taking and no one knows the history behind those two words "if practical" and the legend clouds the truth.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-16-2007, 08:57 AM
larry_cockerham's Avatar
1st Lt. (3500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,706
Default

My old dicitionary (new when I bought it) claims that practical is the result of comparing an actual experience with previously expressed ideals or speculations (paraphrased a bit).

I suspect that was the spirit in which Lee delivered his orders. Whether it was 'tradition' or not to include the phrase, would of course be a mildly interesting research topic.

That brings me at least to the thought that an order given in a complex battlefield directive, as presumeably the charge at Gettysburg was given, depended on considerable coordination of timing and location to have a chance in ---- of succeeding. If a practical minded young general observed that this was no place to be and ducked or diverted his men for survival, then that action was a bit of a hindrance to any potential success of the original order.

Lee was traditionally held in perception to be a man who should have well understood that concept. If so, why would he use the phrase ' if practical'? Was it something he could do when he knew options on the field were available? At Gettysburg, he would doubtless have thought otherwise.

Forrest, by contrast, to my knowledge, was never quoted with that phrase, though Forrest, by all accounts, was no Lee.
__________________
Ancestors in US Army: 13th TN Cav; 10th TN Cav; 3rd NC Inf
Ancestors in CSA Army: 48th VA; 63rd VA, 5th NC Cav; 37th NC
Wife and Grandson's CSA: 15th AL, 51st GA, 41st TN; 36th TN; GA Mil 1197 Dist

Last edited by larry_cockerham : 09-16-2007 at 08:59 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-16-2007, 10:34 AM
samgrant's Avatar
Brig. General, Trivia Mod
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Land of Lincoln (and Grant)
Posts: 3,792
Default

I've also seen variations of the "if". Most commonly "if practicable" -as in Order 191, part of which below:


6. General Walker, with his division, after accomplishing the object in which he is now engaged, will cross the Potomac at Cheek's Ford, ascend its right bank to Lovettsville, take possession of Loudoun Heights, if practicable, by Friday morning, Key's Ford on his left, and the road between the end of the mountain and the Potomac on his right. He will, as far as practicable, cooperate with General McLaws and Jackson, and intercept retreat of the enemy.

Back to the dictionary Larry.
__________________
-

"It was a very peculiar time." - Franklin D. Cossitt

Ancestors in USA Army: 6th IA Inf, 11th IL Cav, 1st AL Cav; 122nd NY Inf; 6th MI Cav; 35th MA Inf; 100th IL Inf; 1st CO Inf/Cav; 22nd IN Inf

Ancestors in CSA Army: 2nd TN Inf (Walker's), 9th TN Cav (Bennett's/Ward's); 2nd TX Inf
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com.
Site Design Version 4.2. - Website powered by Subdreamer CMS
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations