Civil War History - General DiscussionFor Discussions on Civil War Era Personalities, Politics, Issues, Campaigns, Battles, and more. Serious Civil War Discussions Only Please! All other posts will be deleted.
I like how it is mentioned, "the old meeting the new"...the old cavalier, in his neo Napaleonic style and gentleman configuration, meeting the new...hardened warrior in mud covered boots and a sack coat...the signs were there....
I was under the impression that the new uniform he had ordered was in one of the baggage trains during the run to Appomatox? The one he did wear, whether new or not, was not the day to day type uniform, it was the dress uniform, what we would call today the Class A.
__________________
"In mortal combat, a man may and will become so infuriated by the din and dangers of a bloody fight that his heart will turn to stone and his every de sire [be] for blood."
John Hadley, 7th Indiana after the battle at Port Republic
Like 5fish, I'm waiting for someone to come on board who knows when Lee bought the uniform. Then we can address the connection between the uniform and the decision to surrender.
I believe Lee knew the jig was up when he decided to face Grant from Petersburg rather than get away with the AoNV relatively intact.
ole
__________________ I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Do we know that it was a new uniform and that he had just gotten it? Maybe it was new in the sense that he hadn't worn it much or at all.
First we start with its newness. We can speculate from there.
ole
I think there ain't much logic in this question. Lee was a man of means, unlike many of the rest of us. His uniform could have been three years old, but in unworn condition. He spent much time in the field, and was rarely called to the white house during the period 1861-65, though he may have been called many things by folks in the white house. The Confederate system would have very likely been unable to produce such a uniform in a rapid manner in 1865 for lots of reasons. A private tailor, perhaps. We can't ask Lee, so it's a long goose hunt for records. Lee was well smart enough to figure the war was a long shot at best when it began. He was afterall the commander at West Point. Certainly by Gettysburg in July 1863 any doubts would have been erased from his mind. Anyone have thoughts that can be printed?
__________________
Ancestors in US Army: 13th TN Cav; 10th TN Cav; 3rd NC Inf
Ancestors in CSA Army: 48th VA; 63rd VA, 5th NC Cav; 37th NC
Wife and Grandson's CSA: 15th AL, 51st GA, 41st TN; 36th TN; GA Mil 1197 Dist
I think Lee, if one accepts his brillance, had some knowledge of the ending, very early in the war.
It is like a horseman of the time, knowing he is riding a poor horse, but has to ride it for the days needed to cover 100 miles. Lee was that accepting a rider.
I think it goes beyond the uniform.
Lee warned his son in early 1863, the odds the Confederacy faced. Lee had that religious faith that God would lead them to eventual victory.
As bad as Lee was at facing what he knew as a soldier, Jefferson Davis was much worse in his presidential capacity. He seemed clueless to his very capture in Georgia.
The Army of Northern Virginia, after a long winter in the trenches in '64-65, with meagre supplies, had no business attempting to march away. Their lines were broken near Petersburg and the battles that immediately followed was a slaughterhouse for the Confederacy.
We know the army was half starved; how much ammunition did the ANV have left at Appomattox before the surrender. In reality, it was an army in name only.
Grant knew for months, that the war was over. I'm sure he didn't want his army to kill the last fighting Confederate.
Perhaps that was Lee's fragile failing. He would not accept defeat and would not accept its coming.
Its an interesting concept to be sure, but it all does revolve around when he actually got the uniform itself. I have never run across any information on the uniform, except that it was very well tailored and elaborate. I would hazard a guess that there are three very real possibilities of a time when he got the uniform. The first is in the summer of 1862, after he has been made commander of the Army of Northern Virginia. He was now an army commander and needed to look the part. The second is in 1865, when he is made commander of all Confederate armies in the field. And the third is that he had it from close to the beginning, him being the military advisor to the President and he may have had to attend balls and other functions.
Number three, I think, has the greatest possibility, as he was going to be in Richmond, around political men and possibly foreign dignitaries, and he needed to look the part of a general. I am sure he wanted to command in the field, but he was at the time a military advisor. It is possible that he did not get the uniform until almost the time he took command of the AoNV and he never got a chance to wear it, hence its appearance of being almost brand new and looking as if it had never been worn.
Number one also has some credence, seeing as he was probably planning an invasion of the North and wanted to look the part of a conquering general. Its a possibility, but holds less credence than three.
And number two I think is a far stretch, because by the time he was made commander of all armies in the field, the war was practically over, and though he was a man of means, the material was probably all but non-existent by that point in the war.
He wore his best uniform for the reason that he intended on being captured, I think. He probably expected to be taken in as a traitor and he wanted to look his best. From what I have read, he was a bit insulted by the fact that Grant came in looking shabby, begrimed and spattered in mud.
So that is my take. It would take alot of digging to find a receipt or some mention of when he got it, but it very well could be out there. Its an interesting theory, to be sure!!
__________________ "The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize." George Washington, Farewell Address, 1796
Which is the only reason I have for pursuing it. I'd wager that Grant had similar regalia stashed somewhere. (If you're a top general, you simply must have an appropriate uniform for those occasional state occasions.) I've always been privately pleased that Grant and Sherman were so obviously unconcerned with their appearance. Grant's dishabille at the surrender, contrasted with Lee's impeccable attire speaks volumes.
But I digress. My conclusion is that Lee had the dress uniform in one of his trunks. The uniform had nothing to do with his anticipation of a surrender.
ole
__________________ I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
You wrote: "He wore his best uniform for the reason that he intended on being captured, I think. He probably expected to be taken in as a traitor and he wanted to look his best. From what I have read, he was a bit insulted by the fact that Grant came in looking shabby, begrimed and spattered in mud."
I suspect that logic is far worse than some of my crap?
He wore his best uniform to represent his beloved Virginia and the Confederacy in the most dignified manner possible. He was, above all, a cultured gentleman, the descendant of a couple of Virginia's most prominent families. He had corresponded with all the ranking folks involved in the close of the war for years prior and wasn't particularly worried about being a traitor, which he wasn't. Grant, being a little shabby, might have insulted him mildly, but in the case of Grant, I doubt Lee was surprised. Grant was a soldier who occasionally acted a bit human. Culture and finesse weren't Grant's strong points. Running an army and ending a war were his gold stars.
__________________
Ancestors in US Army: 13th TN Cav; 10th TN Cav; 3rd NC Inf
Ancestors in CSA Army: 48th VA; 63rd VA, 5th NC Cav; 37th NC
Wife and Grandson's CSA: 15th AL, 51st GA, 41st TN; 36th TN; GA Mil 1197 Dist
I agree that Gen. Lee had all the appropriate uniforms for his status within the confederate army; but all the eye wittnesses keep refering to it as a new uniform. These eye wittnesses are themselves military officers and most of them should be able to tell if a uniform is new or not.
We have only questions until we know the history behind the uniform Gen. Lee at appomattox in April 1865.
My theory that it was because he thought that the possibility of capture was there doesn't come from off the top of my head, but from gleanings of works I have read. It may be true, it may not, and it will take me more time to read up on it. When I said, I think, I meant it more as an "if I remember what I read." Lee himself later said to his men as to his appearance that "I have probably to be General Grant's prisoner today and thought I must make my best appearance." So from his own words, it seems as if he thought it a possibility. This account above is from Jay Winik's April 1865: The Month That Saved America. So its out there, and it has credence, though maybe he only thought it a possibility and not a likelihood, but it was in his mind, that seems to be for certain.
__________________ "The unity of government which constitutes you one people is also now dear to you. It is justly so, for it is a main pillar in the edifice of your real independence, the support of your tranquility at home, your peace abroad; of your safety; of your prosperity; of that very liberty which you so highly prize." George Washington, Farewell Address, 1796