CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - General Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Chat Calendar Mark Forums Read

Civil War History - General Discussion For Discussions on Civil War Era Personalities, Politics, Issues, Campaigns, Battles, and more. Serious Civil War Discussions Only Please! All other posts will be deleted.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-27-2007, 09:39 AM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: near Granny White pike
Posts: 33
Default A Savage Cowardly Attack on a Surrendered Confederate General

As union forces were overrunning the entire confederate line on the 2nd day at Nashville, Thomas Benton Smith, young Brigadier General, was ordered to hold the prominence later known as Shy's Hill at all hazards. Attacking in overwhelming numbers against the hill at the far left of the Confederate line where the guns were improperly placed so that they could not be correctly lowered to hit the attackers, the position was quickly overrun and hand to hand fighting ensued. Smith was in command at this position. He held til the last moment, then surrendered with a white handkerchief. As he was being led to the rear he was accosted by a union officer who some say was insane, some say was overwhelmed with the emotion of battle, others say was just plain drunk. Smith said, "Sir, I am a surrendered prisoner of war." This enraged the union officer and he proceeded to strike Smith on the head again and again with his sabre until other union soldiers stopped the attack. Smith was grievously wounded. The doctor treating him said, "Sir, you have seen your last battle as I can see your brain through the broken bones." But Smith survived. Unfortunately, he would never recover. He soon after the war ended up at the Tennessee Home for the Insane in Nashville. He died there many years later, never having recovered from this vicious sabre attack that occured after he had surrendered.

So, the question for the board is this: Who was this cowardly union officer who assaulted Smith, and was he ever punished for this crime?

Thank you.
FY
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-27-2007, 09:59 AM
2nd Lt. (2500+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,680
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by formerYank
As union forces were overrunning the entire confederate line on the 2nd day at Nashville, Thomas Benton Smith, young Brigadier General, was ordered to hold the prominence later known as Shy's Hill at all hazards. Attacking in overwhelming numbers against the hill at the far left of the Confederate line where the guns were improperly placed so that they could not be correctly lowered to hit the attackers, the position was quickly overrun and hand to hand fighting ensued. Smith was in command at this position. He held til the last moment, then surrendered with a white handkerchief. As he was being led to the rear he was accosted by a union officer who some say was insane, some say was overwhelmed with the emotion of battle, others say was just plain drunk. Smith said, "Sir, I am a surrendered prisoner of war." This enraged the union officer and he proceeded to strike Smith on the head again and again with his sabre until other union soldiers stopped the attack. Smith was grievously wounded. The doctor treating him said, "Sir, you have seen your last battle as I can see your brain through the broken bones." But Smith survived. Unfortunately, he would never recover. He soon after the war ended up at the Tennessee Home for the Insane in Nashville. He died there many years later, never having recovered from this vicious sabre attack that occured after he had surrendered.

So, the question for the board is this: Who was this cowardly union officer who assaulted Smith, and was he ever punished for this crime?

Thank you.
FY
I have seen it said to have been Col. William Linn McMillan of Ohio, commanding the 1st Brigade of McArthur's division. One account says Smith was struck three times, and the accounts I have seen repeat the doctor's words above. Smith did manage to recover enough physically to do some railroad work after the war, but went into the asylum about 10 or 11 years later and remained there until his death in 1923 (except for some trips to veterans reunions apparently.)

Regards,
Tim
__________________
"Let us, then, consider all attempts to weaken this Union, by maintaining that each state is separately and individually independent, as a species of political heresy, which can never benefit us, but may bring on us the most serious distresses."
Charles Cotesworth Pinckney of South Carolina, 1740-1824, Revolutionary War soldier, one of the authors of the US Constitution in 1787, speaking at the South Carolina Ratifying Convention in 1788.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-27-2007, 10:08 AM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 60
Default

Ohio Col. William Linn McMillan, commander of a portion of the victorious federal troops. McMillan was an alcoholic who had nearly been cashiered from the service for misconduct, and at the moment he confronted Genl. Smith he may have been drunk, or perhaps simply flushed with adrenaline and "temporarily insane" from the intensity of battle.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-27-2007, 11:07 AM
johan_steele's Avatar
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South of the North 40
Posts: 3,679
Default

It was Union troops that stopped the attack, IIRC a Sgt Major in the lead who pretty sharply shamed the man. I've read the MacArthur reprimanded the man but have never seen a direct reference to the reprimand.
__________________
Shane Christen
American Legion Post 352
SUVCW Camp Abernethy# 48
Lifetime NRA member
3rd MN VI

For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow. Eccl 1:18
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-27-2007, 11:34 AM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is online now
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,551
Default

The attack was certainly not the action of an officer and gentleman which Col. McMillan apparently was not--if it was McMillan.

A devilish thought occurred to me while reading the accounts: the implication is that the attack was the direct cause of General Smith's subsequent sojourn at Happy Acres; can any medico make that connection?

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-28-2007, 05:20 PM
2nd Lt. (2500+ posts)
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2,680
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ole
The attack was certainly not the action of an officer and gentleman which Col. McMillan apparently was not--if it was McMillan.

A devilish thought occurred to me while reading the accounts: the implication is that the attack was the direct cause of General Smith's subsequent sojourn at Happy Acres; can any medico make that connection?
I don't know, but from the description it seems like a good possibility, whether physical or psychological. Apparently he was struck in the head three times with the sword, cracking his skull so that the doctor who examined him could see his brain oozing through the cracks. (Obviously not light blows, and probably not administered with a "cake-cutter", but a heavier sword.) The Union soldiers were amazed he survived at all, but his physical health returned and he was able to work and function to some extent after the war for a few years. By 1876 he had been committed, and remained in the institution until 1923, when he passed away.

Regards,
Tim
__________________
"Let us, then, consider all attempts to weaken this Union, by maintaining that each state is separately and individually independent, as a species of political heresy, which can never benefit us, but may bring on us the most serious distresses."
Charles Cotesworth Pinckney of South Carolina, 1740-1824, Revolutionary War soldier, one of the authors of the US Constitution in 1787, speaking at the South Carolina Ratifying Convention in 1788.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com.
Site Design Version 4.2. - Website powered by Subdreamer CMS
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations