CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - General Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Chat Calendar Mark Forums Read

Civil War History - General Discussion For Discussions on Civil War Era Personalities, Politics, Issues, Campaigns, Battles, and more. Serious Civil War Discussions Only Please! All other posts will be deleted.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-09-2007, 09:32 AM
johan_steele's Avatar
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South of the North 40
Posts: 3,675
Default

I suspect PM = Post Master (typically Brigade or Division level). THough the one I can recall was listed as detached w/ mail beside the name. As to Provost I have usually seen on rolls is abrevieted PG (Provost Guard) hence where the modern term "pig" referencing police comes from. Though I seem to remember an officer detached as a PM referencing Provost Marshall. I have seem PM abrevieted to mean "pioneer master" as a skilled artisan in charge of a pioneer detail of some sort. And again I recall PM used to describe "procuring materials" for a man sent off post to a nearby town to purchase items needed at a fort.

The PM could stand for quite a few things but usually the officer made a notation on the roll (or one of the rolls) to define any abreviations. What throws me is the term off duty... I can only recall seeing that in conjunction w/ furlough or leaves.

As an example "Off duty as FG" threw me off for quite a while, couple year IIRC, until I discovered what a furlough guard was.

Keep in mind if you can view the original document (or a copy) you can often discover far more by looking at it in context. To make matters even more entertaining it was not usually profesional soldiers doing the paperwork. Many of the rolls I have seen were obviously quickly and carelessly done and the format copied from a book instead of using any kind of standard form... even then rolls were not always standardized and I know the same is true for abreviations. I've seen an obviously bloodstained roll... taken the morning after a rather sharp fight where the officer signing had been badly wounded. That put shivers down my spine.

Most states have very complete copies or original rolls available in the historical societies. I've looked through some of those in Illinois, Iowa, Minesota, Wisconsin and some from Indiana. It might be worth a visit to the State hysterical society from which your ancestors Regt served.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul L. Hulse
Shane: About 5 years ago I sent off and received my G-G Grandfather's military records from the National Archives. There is one thing in there that I can not find out what it means. He was listed "Off Duty as PM" in January 1862. He was at that time a First Sergeant. I am retired Army and know that senior NCO's sometime fill in for Officers when needed. This PM baffles me and I have asked several people of all walks of life without results. Does PM stand for Provost Marshall or Post Master or some other duty I don't know about?

Paul
__________________
Shane Christen
American Legion Post 352
SUVCW Camp Abernethy# 48
Lifetime NRA member
3rd MN VI

For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow. Eccl 1:18
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-10-2007, 08:05 AM
Cadet
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Columbus, Georgia
Posts: 24
Default

Shane: That was supposed to be On Duty not Off Duty; my fault for not proof reading. I'll go along with Post Master--he was an English Scholar.

Paul
__________________
Paul L. Hulse
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-10-2007, 04:17 PM
larry_cockerham's Avatar
1st Lt. (3500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,706
Default

My gg grandfather became post master for about three years in 1870. He was marginally literate! Politics and availability seemed to have been a factor with those jobs.
__________________
Ancestors in US Army: 13th TN Cav; 10th TN Cav; 3rd NC Inf
Ancestors in CSA Army: 48th VA; 63rd VA, 5th NC Cav; 37th NC
Wife and Grandson's CSA: 15th AL, 51st GA, 41st TN; 36th TN; GA Mil 1197 Dist
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-04-2007, 07:14 PM
custersluck13's Avatar
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Michigan, USA
Posts: 113
Default

I recently finished a very good book. "The Orphan Brigade" by William C. Davis...as I used to reenact with a KY (CSA) unit, I still collect as much material on this amazing unit as I can. In the case of Johnny Jackman, whose autobiography I also have, he seems to have spent the war detailed as a orderly, due to a combination of factors. not the least being he was a very literate man. From what I can glean since my original posting here, it seems most of these details were assigned pretty much the way they still are. Alot of guys, for one reason or another, not deemed usable or essential to a combat unit, are detailed out for this and that. Doesnt look like there were "full time" support and service personel as far as I can tell.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-04-2007, 07:49 PM
gary's Avatar
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,283
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by larry_cockerham
Can you shed any additional light on the set up (organization?) of Confederate medical support troops? Was it a regimental thing? What happened at major battles? You mention 'hospital attendants'. Were there actual hospitals pre-existing as such before the war or are we talking about commandeered large buildings hastily organized?? Certainly folks of all origins and skills must have been involved with that effort? I assume wounded from the major battles from the Confederacy must have received some less than priority care from Union medical sites?
Larry, I've read Confederate muster cards with entries reading "Absent," and followed with "detached as teamster" or something to the extent of "hospital attendant." As for hospitals, some like Chimborazo were set up by the gubmint. You can read Alexander Hunter's book, Johnny Reb and Billy Yank, for his description of Confederate hospitals. As a recovering patient, Hunter even performed surgeries (amputations) when the surgeons were too exhausted.

Now, as to the treatment of Confederates, I believe Union surgeons treated theirs first and then tended to the Confederates. The care didn't change (it was barbaric by today's standards anyhow), but the priority was ours first, yours later. Of course, being a Mason probably helped too.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com.
Site Design Version 4.2. - Website powered by Subdreamer CMS
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations