CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - General Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Chat Calendar Mark Forums Read

Civil War History - General Discussion For Discussions on Civil War Era Personalities, Politics, Issues, Campaigns, Battles, and more. Serious Civil War Discussions Only Please! All other posts will be deleted.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 10-05-2007, 10:33 PM
5fish's Avatar
Sergeant (500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 756
Default Pig War Of 1859!

Quote:
Originally Posted by matthew mckeon
The United States made four attempts to seize Canada, or portions of Canada. 1)The invasion of 1775-6, which ended with the destruction of Benedict Arnold's invading force, 2)the various attempts in the War of 1812, one of which ended with the capture of a young(and persumably slimmer)Winfield Scott, as well as the burning of Washington DC in retaliation to the burning of York, Ontario.
3) A filibustering expedition in the 1830s, which ended with Canadian forces seizing the expedition's steamboat, setting it afire and sending the burning wreck over Niagara Falls, 4) the Fenian invasion of 1866.

So to be fair to 19th century Americans, they tried to conquer Canada several times, just not successfully.

You left out the Pig War of 1859, when the shooting of a pig led to a border dispute in the northwest over the island of San Juan.

George Pickette{Pickette's charge} led some soldiers in taking the island.
William Harney{oversaw the hanging of the San Patricio Battalion) was in charge of the Northwest territory.

In the end, a not so thin Gen. Scott negotiated a compromise with the English.

Hey, we got half an island; but it could have been so much more.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 10-06-2007, 08:06 AM
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,362
Default

"Hey, we got half an island; but it could have been so much more."

Or so much less, my friend.

After World War I, the Canadian military developed Defence Scheme No. 1, a detailed plan to invade the United States, seizing and destroying the northern tier of territory, including Seattle, Chicago, Vermont and other places.

As a Mainer, I'm just grateful I was raised under the Stars and Stripes---not the jackboot of a Mountie.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-06-2007, 08:09 AM
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,362
Default

The creation of Defence Scheme No. 1 saw the infiltration of disguised Canadian officers into our Northernmost cities, observing and recording likely targets. Brrrrrrr.

Actually I have been assured that we would never try to annex Canada since it would mean the addition of millions of voters to the Democratic Party.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 05-23-2008, 01:34 PM
Battalion's Avatar
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,707
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 5fish View Post
The viability of the confederacy was always in question.

Legally the confederacy never existed for it was never recognized by any other nations of the world and our nation(U.S.A.) always referred to the war as a rebellion...
Even if you exclude the Pope's positive acknowlegement of Jefferson Davis as President of the CSA as Recognition...there is still the Indian Nations.

The various indigenous peoples of America were recognized by the United States as sovereign...hence Indian Nations. These people were not living in mud huts and teepees...they had their own constitutions, governments and courts. The United States and Confederate States entered into numerous treaties with these nations.
__________________
POWER & MONEY

"Your New-York bankers and merchants are shrewd people, but I never gave them credit for so much sagacity as when they took the Government Loan. It was not merely patriotism, it was a high stroke of policy. It has saved the Government, and what they will regard as equally important, saved them from a great financial disaster."

New York Times, 27 September 1861
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 05-23-2008, 04:16 PM
Borderruffian's Avatar
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Missouri
Posts: 260
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Battalion View Post
Even if you exclude the Pope's positive acknowlegement of Jefferson Davis as President of the CSA as Recognition...there is still the Indian Nations.

The various indigenous peoples of America were recognized by the United States as sovereign...hence Indian Nations. These people were not living in mud huts and teepees...they had their own constitutions, governments and courts. The United States and Confederate States entered into numerous treaties with these nations.
While they are and were sovereign to an extent. The Indian Nations were and are still subject to federal as well as tribal law on the reservations.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com.
Site Design Version 4.2. - Website powered by Subdreamer CMS
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations