Quote:
|
Originally Posted by IAmHistory It bothers me that so many Southerners put down Sherman for just doing what he had to do. I tend to believe the South just can't get over the fact that they were outsmarted, outmanuvered and intimidated by such brilliant tactics and strategy. Am I wrong here? Sherman did nothing that went against international laws of the time and I don't understand why the South faults him so much. Explanations welcome.  |
I agree with your position. Sherman had his duty, and both he and Lincoln knew what was required to win the war. The same Southern partisans who talk so much about duty should understand that. Sherman knew what he had to do, and he did it. Also, as far as I know Sherman did not kill any civilians, he simply destroyed property. When southerners refer to Sherman as a war criminal, I believe they should keep that in mind.
Also, I'm inclined to believe that Sherman was as good a general as Jackson or any others.