CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - General Discussion

Civil War History - General Discussion For Discussions on Civil War Era Personalities, Politics, Issues, Campaigns, Battles, and more. Serious Civil War Discussions Only Please! All other posts will be deleted.

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #381  
Old 06-16-2006, 11:16 PM
larry_cockerham's Avatar
1st Lt. (3500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 3,934
Default

I'm making a distinction between the subsistence farmer with one or two workers (slaves) tending the cows and helping raise the Owner's kids and the boys with perhaps 20,000 acres of cotton or rice who had communities of slaves with a staff of overseers.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #382  
Old 06-16-2006, 11:28 PM
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,457
Default

Dear William 42,

In reference to your post 371. The "point" of searching for dark looking faces in blurry photographs is to try to create a legion of black defenders of the Confederacy. The reason this is necessary has been explored on this and other, similar threads.

The reality behind the myth of black confederates is clear for anyone to see.
Except in very, very small numbers, for limited times, in unusual circumstances, blacks did not fight for the CSA. The reasons are obvious (1) the CSA did not want blacks to fight for them. (2) blacks did not want to fight for the CSA.

The photograph of the Army of Northern Virginia on the march is a famous one, frequently published. It does not show a black confederate soldier unless you really, really want to see one.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #383  
Old 06-16-2006, 11:38 PM
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,457
Default

Dear Larry,

I understand your distinction between two types of slave owners. However, for the slave himself, which was the more desirable situation? Because I'm writing my finals for the end of the year, I'm going to put this question in multiple choice form.
Which is the more desirable situation for the enslaved man?

1) trapped on a small isolated farm with a farmer who has nothing to do but make sure he works you every minute to reclaim his investment. Constant attention and demands, few opportunities to find friends or have a family.

2. trapped on a large plantation, worked efficiently and relentlessly by a professional hard nosed overseer. More fellow workers, seperate, if primitive quarters, and the chance for some life outside the round of backbreaking labor.

3. Actually, they both are unthinkably awful.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #384  
Old 06-16-2006, 11:44 PM
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,457
Default

Dear Larry,

I understand your distinction between two types of slave owners. However, for the slave himself, which was the more desirable situation? Because I'm writing my finals for the end of the year, I'm going to put this question in multiple choice form.
Which is the more desirable situation for the enslaved man?
1) trapped on a small isolated farm with a farmer who has nothing to do but make sure he works you every minute to reclaim his investment. Constant attention and demands, few opportunities to find friends or have a family.

2. trapped on a large plantation, worked efficiently and relentlessly by a professional hard nosed overseer. More fellow workers, seperate, if primitive quarters, and the chance for some life outside the round of backbreaking labor.

3. Actually, they both are unthinkably awful.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #385  
Old 06-16-2006, 11:47 PM
samgrant's Avatar
Brig. General, Trivia Mod
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Land of Lincoln (and Grant)
Posts: 3,989
Default

So how about, say 4000-5000 acres of cotton and mixed agriculture, some cattle and hogs, etc. and about 127 slaves - would that be significant?
__________________
-

"It was a very peculiar time." - Franklin D. Cossitt

Ancestors in USA Army: 6th IA Inf, 11th IL Cav, 1st AL Cav; 122nd NY Inf; 6th MI Cav; 35th MA Inf; 100th IL Inf; 1st CO Inf/Cav; 22nd IN Inf

Ancestors in CSA Army: 2nd TN Inf (Walker's), 9th TN Cav (Bennett's/Ward's); 2nd TX Inf
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #386  
Old 06-16-2006, 11:55 PM
samgrant's Avatar
Brig. General, Trivia Mod
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Land of Lincoln (and Grant)
Posts: 3,989
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by matthew mckeon
Dear Larry,

I understand your distinction between two types of slave owners. However, for the slave himself, which was the more desirable situation? Because I'm writing my finals for the end of the year, I'm going to put this question in multiple choice form.
Which is the more desirable situation for the enslaved man?
1) trapped on a small isolated farm with a farmer who has nothing to do but make sure he works you every minute to reclaim his investment. Constant attention and demands, few opportunities to find friends or have a family.

2. trapped on a large plantation, worked efficiently and relentlessly by a professional hard nosed overseer. More fellow workers, seperate, if primitive quarters, and the chance for some life outside the round of backbreaking labor.

3. Actually, they both are unthinkably awful.
You might add:

4. worked on a large plantation, for a relatively benevolent owner, saw my job as that as a "business man -seed to everything" or as a "foreman".

5. None of the above.
__________________
-

"It was a very peculiar time." - Franklin D. Cossitt

Ancestors in USA Army: 6th IA Inf, 11th IL Cav, 1st AL Cav; 122nd NY Inf; 6th MI Cav; 35th MA Inf; 100th IL Inf; 1st CO Inf/Cav; 22nd IN Inf

Ancestors in CSA Army: 2nd TN Inf (Walker's), 9th TN Cav (Bennett's/Ward's); 2nd TX Inf
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #387  
Old 06-17-2006, 12:18 AM
william42's Avatar
First Sergeant (1000+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Evansville, Indiana
Posts: 1,619
Default

Quote:
The "point" of searching for dark looking faces in blurry photographs is to try to create a legion of black defenders of the Confederacy. The reason this is necessary has been explored on this and other, similar threads.
Yeah I know that conclusion has been the catalyst for the persistent, bulldogged, ceaseless efforts by those on the board who wish to push that viewpoint. Good gosh almighty they need to have us believe that. Why? Because it would tell us all, if we could be convinced, that if blacks fought for the Confederacy en masse, then how bad could slavery have been? They were so happy with their lot within the institution of slavery that they actually picked up rifles..in droves to fight for it. Sorry, I still don't buy into it. A few blacks, maybe. Hundreds or thousands?....never happened.

Okay.....go Battalion. Your turn.


TW
__________________
"In this great struggle, this form of Government and every form of human right is endangered if our enemies succeed. There is more involved in this contest than is realized by every one."
Abraham Lincoln - August 18, 1864 Speech to the 164th Ohio Regiment
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #388  
Old 06-17-2006, 12:26 AM
samgrant's Avatar
Brig. General, Trivia Mod
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Land of Lincoln (and Grant)
Posts: 3,989
Default

The thought occurs: Why debate the obvious?

I'd still like to know about that '"significant slaveholder" though.
__________________
-

"It was a very peculiar time." - Franklin D. Cossitt

Ancestors in USA Army: 6th IA Inf, 11th IL Cav, 1st AL Cav; 122nd NY Inf; 6th MI Cav; 35th MA Inf; 100th IL Inf; 1st CO Inf/Cav; 22nd IN Inf

Ancestors in CSA Army: 2nd TN Inf (Walker's), 9th TN Cav (Bennett's/Ward's); 2nd TX Inf
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #389  
Old 06-17-2006, 12:38 AM
Battalion's Avatar
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,928
Default Louisiana Native Guard......Never Mustered into Confederate Service?

Strange how they went out of their way to tell us this so many times-

Quote:
Originally Posted by johan
"...they were never mustered into CS service or armed and never gave any kind of service to the CS..."

"...were never mustered or accepted into CS service..."

"...was never mustered, armed or recognized by the CS..."

"...never mustered in or utilized by the CS at all..."
Quote:
Originally Posted by trice
"...The Native Guards, of course, were not called to service under the Confederacy..."

"...they were not accepted into Confederate service..."

"...tendered its service to the CS... and it was refused and sent packing..."

"...They were never mustered into Confederate service. They existed only in the state militia..."



The problem with these statements is.....they may not be true...

"Some War Department officials were considerably surprised a few days ago while compiling the list of soldiers who served during the civil war, to discover that a regiment of negroes had been mustered into the Confederate service from New Orleans..."

New Orleans Daily States, May 24, 1903


I will investigate...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
  #390  
Old 06-17-2006, 12:45 AM
samgrant's Avatar
Brig. General, Trivia Mod
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Land of Lincoln (and Grant)
Posts: 3,989
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Battalion
Strange

The problem with these statements is.....they may not be true...



I will investigate...
Strange alright, why don't you investigate all those UFOs while you are at it.
__________________
-

"It was a very peculiar time." - Franklin D. Cossitt

Ancestors in USA Army: 6th IA Inf, 11th IL Cav, 1st AL Cav; 122nd NY Inf; 6th MI Cav; 35th MA Inf; 100th IL Inf; 1st CO Inf/Cav; 22nd IN Inf

Ancestors in CSA Army: 2nd TN Inf (Walker's), 9th TN Cav (Bennett's/Ward's); 2nd TX Inf
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations