CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - General Discussion

Civil War History - General Discussion For Discussions on Civil War Era Personalities, Politics, Issues, Campaigns, Battles, and more. Serious Civil War Discussions Only Please! All other posts will be deleted.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #111  
Old 02-17-2008, 08:44 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is offline
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,785
Default

Nico wrote on another thread:
Quote:
Still waiting for answer. If Texas (and all other southerns states) never left the Union during the Civil War why did they not have a representatives in US congress during 1861-186x/7x (whenever the state was readmitted to Union - that`s funny if they did not left the Union, how could they be readmitted?)
Aside from the fact that all the secesh senators and representatives resigned, a simple answer is that both the US House and Senate could and can refuse to seat them.

With regard to White vs. Texas: Whether a court is stacked or packed has no bearing on the legality of the court's decision. When SCOTUS says it is so, it is so. And it remains so until a change of personnel stacks it the other way -- and that's no guarantee that another court will overturn it.

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 02-17-2008, 08:54 PM
Nico_Davout's Avatar
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Poland, Warsaw
Posts: 131
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ole View Post
NAside from the fact that all the secesh senators and representatives resigned, a simple answer is that both the US House and Senate could and can refuse to seat them.
That is ok for 1861-65, but what about 65-70? Federal goverment was restored in southern states. They were still in the Union according to US Supreme Court. Why the representatives were not chosen? The US House and Senate could still refuse to chose a new representatives?
__________________
Nico, Maréchal d'Empire
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 02-17-2008, 09:00 PM
Freddy's Avatar
Corporal (250+ posts)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Worcester, MA
Posts: 399
Default

In my view the US should have recognized the Unionist Virginia state government as the legitimate Virginia government and then allowed the rest of the state to rejoin it. Then the state legislature representing all residents could decide. Creating a new state during the war seems unnecessary. It was not the same as when the Massachusetts legislature that represented all MA residents agreed to part with Maine in 1820.
__________________
"Those who forget to remember the past are condemned to repeat it", George Santayana.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 02-17-2008, 09:36 PM
Sergeant Major (1750+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,395
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nico_Davout View Post
That is ok for 1861-65, but what about 65-70? Federal goverment was restored in southern states. They were still in the Union according to US Supreme Court. Why the representatives were not chosen? The US House and Senate could still refuse to chose a new representatives?
Yes, the US House and Senate has the authority to determine the qualifications of its members according to the Constitution. They can refuse to seat anyone they choose.

Regards,
Cash
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 02-17-2008, 11:20 PM
ole's Avatar
ole ole is offline
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 6,785
Default

Quote:
The US House and Senate could still refuse to chose a new representatives?
The Senate and House do not choose representatives; the states do. But the Senate and House can refuse to seat them until their states have met some rather silly qualifications.

ole
__________________
I never knew a man who wished to be himself a slave. Consider if you know any good thing that no man desires for himself. A. Lincoln
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations