CivilWarTalk.com - A free and friendly Civil War community.
CivilWarTalk.com
The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk  

Go Back   The Dispatch Depot at Civil War Talk > The Backpack - Essential Discussions > Civil War History - General Discussion

Civil War History - General Discussion For Discussions on Civil War Era Personalities, Politics, Issues, Campaigns, Battles, and more. Serious Civil War Discussions Only Please! All other posts will be deleted.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-07-2003, 02:16 PM
Cadet
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 16
Default

Hi again everyone, I know its been a long time since I posted here, so here goes. I would like to know the uses of breech-loading carbines by both U.S. and C.S. cavalry. Also any information you could give on the basic cavalry troops of both U.S. and C.S. and how the basic cavalry unit would fight would be greatly appreciated!!! God Bless Yall!!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-09-2003, 09:23 PM
johan_steele's Avatar
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South of the North 40
Posts: 3,982
Default

There were several Breach Loading Carbines in Use by the Union Cav throughout the Civil War with the Sharps & Smith probably being the most heavily used. The Sharps was loved for it's accuracy and reliability, the argument of which is better: Smith or Sharps has been going on for quite a whilew. The Spencer was issued starting in '63 and was in widespread use by the end of the War.

The CS Cav favored the sawed off shotgun and multiple pistols per man throughout the entire war but they also carried a copy of the Sharps and several others... also captured equipment was liberally used.

Check Privateanthony.homestead.com for links to any Cav reenacting groups, you might find quite a bit of info from them.

Good Luck
__________________
Few take the trouble to understand or to view the American scene with perspective. And we Americans love to find ourselves guilty of something. However, it is never I who am guilty, but those other Americans, the past or present government or the other political party. Americans almost never find other countries guilty. It is always ourselves or our fancied influence in other countries. Louis L'amour
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-10-2003, 12:24 PM
jac jac is offline
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 49
Default

How a cavalry unit fought evolved during the war. Early in the conflict, the traditional saber charge took place, and the duties of cavalry involved scouting, and screening the main body from enemy scouting.
Later in the war, cavalry, particularly Union cavalry equipped with breechloaders, were often used more in the mounted infantry role, or: use the speed of horses to get somewhere quickly, then fight on foot, like infantry.
Buford at Gettysburg would be a good example of this, and Sheridan's use of cavalry would be another example. And, of course, Nathan Bedford Forrest.
The saber charge was still used on occasion, but the frequency of its use declined as the war went on.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-10-2003, 03:42 PM
Private (25+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 150
Default

I heard sometime ago that Forrest frowned on his troopers using sabers preferring they use firearms.He too believing the saber to be a dated weapon.

Illreb
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-10-2003, 05:48 PM
Cadet
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 14
Default

Hi Dustin,

The cavalry fought in many ways. They had several important jobs beyond fighting. One important job was to screen army movements and get information about enemy movements. They would act as couriers and scouts. They could be assigned as rear guard or flankers on moving columns of infantry or artillery. They were an intelligence gathering arm as well as a fighting arm. Raiding behind enemy lines was one thing people seem to note as a cavalry tactic however, this was not generally its purpose. The threat of raiding and hitting the flank was more of a detterent to the enemy moving beyond their source of supply and it kept them on their toes. It took numbers off the frontal assault forces in order to guard against these possibilities.

Light cavalry rarely fought other branches of service. Mounted infantry was utilized creatively instead of true cavalry for this purpose. Many times these men would not be armed with the traditional weapons of light cavalry (sabre/pistol/breechloader) but would instead be carrying infantry arms. They would dismount their horses and move forward as an infantry force. Forrest was noted as using his men in this way.

Within a cavalry brigade there would be regiments who had squadrons with breechloading weapons, sabres for others and pistols too. Some squadrons could even consider themselves sharpshooters.

As a general rule, with light cavalry, they could do many things as fighting tactics went. They could cover a length of ground as dismounts with the 4th man holding the horses while they moved in skirmish formation forward. There would be a reserve held in readiness for the possibility the enemy would fall back disorganized - where the mounted reserves job would be to take advantage of this and charge to rout them.

CSA cavalry never had multiple pistols, in fact they were lucky to be able to arm half the members of each regiment with one pistol. The Union cavalry did get issued one pistol per man. (CSA guerilla forces such as Mosby's men and a few Texas units had multiple pistols due to the nature of their tactics) Shotguns went by the wayside soon after the war commenced, they were rare by mid-war. Some CSA cavalrymen went through at least the early part of the war completely unarmed or armed with a poor or unreliable weapon.

Records I have show a CSA cavalry division in the ANV had the below longarms listed in their inspection reports ('64).
Spencers, Burnsides, Smiths, Enfields, Sharps, Fayettevilles, Austrians, Robinsons, Merrills and Gallaghers.

Sabres were also used throughout the war by regular cavalry. In fact, they were fined for losing any weapon, including sabres. In the west, sabres were less important in the eyes of the CSA cav leaders so they were sometimes turned in or never issued.

Union cavalry were issued their horses. It was said a Union cavalryman used up 5 horses a year from 1863 to 1865. Confederate cavalrymen brought their horses from home or bought them as private purchase. One reason Union cavalry went through so many horses was that while in enemy territory it was common practice to shoot any weary, lame or injured horses unable to keep up with the march in order to keep them out of enemy hands. Thus a horse that merely needed a few days rest was shot rather than turned loose to rest and recuperate.

You can find more information about cavalry at http://9thvirginia.com

I hope this will help you out some,

Linneus Ahearn
9th Virginia Cavalry
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-11-2003, 08:21 AM
johan_steele's Avatar
Brig. General, Mod
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South of the North 40
Posts: 3,982
Default

I'll definetly agree w/ most of what Linneus has to say... good info. Though you'll find quite a few Shotguns in service w/ the Western Cav as well as Mosby, Forrest etc. Actually I'll refer to a CSA Cav man & his horse captured by Griersons men in 63. "...4 Colt pistols in .36, double barrelled shotgun, Enfield carbine and a nice arkansas toothpick." No sabre is mentioned but you'll note the large amount of ordanance for the man, a Texan IIRC. Your standard Union Cav would carry a pistol, carbine and a sabre... which would often find it's way to a baggage train and never be carried in actual campaign. Of note the US Cav of the Post War was regarded as the finest in the world by a prominent European General.

Some of the more famous and useful studies uses of Cav are by Grierson, Buford, Wilder and Sheridan... All are worthy studies. As is Mosby, Forrest and Stuart.
__________________
Few take the trouble to understand or to view the American scene with perspective. And we Americans love to find ourselves guilty of something. However, it is never I who am guilty, but those other Americans, the past or present government or the other political party. Americans almost never find other countries guilty. It is always ourselves or our fancied influence in other countries. Louis L'amour
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-16-2003, 01:54 AM
gary's Avatar
2nd Lt. (2500+ posts)
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,507
Default

For a good display of calvary carbines, check out the Texas Ranger Museum in Waco, Texas.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Back to top
Bringing the American Civil War to Life. Copyright © 1999 - 2008, CivilWarTalk.com. Site Version 4.3
The American Civil War | Forum | Resource Center | Image Gallery | Links | Site Map | XML | Donations